|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shap Full Member
Joined: 09 Apr 2011 Posts: 194 Location: US northwest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EvilDragon wrote: | ...except D510 is definitely by far NOT the best low-power embedded system CPU that's out there. |
My other OS guy and I were discussing just this in the car today. Started with me replaying for him Dan's correction of my ARM v ATOM performance statement. We wanted to understand whether the Akai type of product (where you plug in your iPad) is likely to emerge as a threat. Eric knows a lot more about the low-level hardware these days than I do. We don't think it happens soon, for two reasons:
-Devices like iPad are extremely power constrained and therefore have limited memory bandwidth. Widening that bus would involve a significant power hit. It also involves a larger number of edge pins on the A5 package, which would result in a higher reject rate. Taken in context of the overall iPad target space, we don't expect the memory bandwidth issue to be a design focus for them. Of course, we're speculating.
- ARM is fumbling very badly to get its multicore story working right. Fixing it requires changes to their hardware-level memory consistency model. Those changes entail cache design changes whose power budget implications that will be very hard to swallow. They're going to have to do it, but it may not happen until their 64-bit architecture emerges. They have a lot going on right now.
KRONOS is in a somewhat unusual position as an embedded system. Compared to conventional embedded devices, it's a very low-quantity design. It's thermal and power constraints are much richer then most embedded or hand-held devices. Finally, it needs the horsepower. Because of the memory model issues and the desire for concurrency, ARM isn't really an option.
I'm a little surprised that Korg didn't go fanless, but I'm sure they had a reason. Given the fan, yes, they might have gone with a low-power core-i3, but that would put them up into the desktop chipset pricing scheme. The ATOM design still has a lot of low-hanging performance headroom, so all in all, it's a good choice. And since Korg had most of this stuff running on the OASYS, and the ATOM 510 performance isn't that far off in terms of performance, choosing the lower performance processor (compared to core i3) wasn't an unreasonable risk.
Looking back now, in July 2011, it's easy to say the D525 might have been a better choice, but remember that the D525 was announced in August 2010, and they originally planned to ship in March 2011. Allowing for manufacturing lead time at KORG and availability ramp-up delay from Intel, that would have been pretty risky. _________________ Motif XF8, Kronos-88 (ordered), V-Synth GT, DT-Extreme eDrums
PC Core i7-920/24GB/3TB (2x)
Motu 2408mk3 + 24I/O
Sonar Producer, everything EastWest
Brian Moore iGuitar+Roland GI-20, Composite Acoustics 6, 12 string guitars, Multiple Ovations from when they were still worth it
Presonus Eureka (2x), TC Helicon VoiceOne
ADAM A7's and JBL 4328Ps, each for its purpose
Border Collies + Misc. Squeaky Toys |
|
Back to top |
|
|
madbeatzyo111 Guest
Joined: 13 Jun 2011 Posts: 379
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if the D510 can go fanless at 13 watts TDP. Maybe with a massive heatsink and a lot of ventilation. Let's not forget about liquid cooling too
I suppose the Oasys owners didn't complain hard enough about their fan noise at the time, so Korg thought it was ok to put it in the Kronos too. It's the dangers of fanboyism; the honest criticism that could help make a better product in the future tend to get muted. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NuSkoolTone Approved Merchant
Joined: 19 Mar 2007 Posts: 1069
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
madbeatzyo111 wrote: | I don't know if the D510 can go fanless at 13 watts TDP. Maybe with a massive heatsink and a lot of ventilation. Let's not forget about liquid cooling too
I suppose the Oasys owners didn't complain hard enough about their fan noise at the time, so Korg thought it was ok to put it in the Kronos too. It's the dangers of fanboyism; the honest criticism that could help make a better product in the future tend to get muted. |
Liquid cooling? God no. Simply not worth the hassle and maintenance these days IMO. You still need a pump, and that makes noise too. As long as a low db fan is used, I don't see the issue. _________________ Korg: KRONOS 73, M50-61, 01W/r
Yamaha: Motif XS7, FS1R
Kawai K5000S, Roland JD-990 w/Vintage Synth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cello Platinum Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2009 Posts: 2152 Location: Glasgow, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
madbeatzyo111 wrote: | I suppose the Oasys owners didn't complain hard enough about their fan noise at the time, so Korg thought it was ok to put it in the Kronos too. It's the dangers of fanboyism; the honest criticism that could help make a better product in the future tend to get muted. |
Or alternatively, OASYS users didn't complain about fan noise because there is none to complain about... My O fan can heardly be heard at all; I have to go the end grate to actually hear if it's running or not. _________________ Plugged in: Fantom 8, Jupiter-X, Jupiter 80, System-8, JD-XA, V-Synth GTv2, FA-06, SE-02, JU-06A, TR-09, VT-4, Go:Livecast, Rubix44, Shure SM7b, Push2, Ableton 11 Suite, Sibelius, KRK Rokit 5, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
synthjoe Platinum Member
Joined: 21 Apr 2010 Posts: 1011
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NuSkoolTone wrote: | madbeatzyo111 wrote: | I don't know if the D510 can go fanless at 13 watts TDP. Maybe with a massive heatsink and a lot of ventilation. Let's not forget about liquid cooling too
I suppose the Oasys owners didn't complain hard enough about their fan noise at the time, so Korg thought it was ok to put it in the Kronos too. It's the dangers of fanboyism; the honest criticism that could help make a better product in the future tend to get muted. |
Liquid cooling? God no. Simply not worth the hassle and maintenance these days IMO. You still need a pump, and that makes noise too. As long as a low db fan is used, I don't see the issue. |
Heatpipes to the metal casing would have been a nice and modern, proven solution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
madbeatzyo111 Guest
Joined: 13 Jun 2011 Posts: 379
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
cello wrote: | Or alternatively, OASYS users didn't complain about fan noise because there is none to complain about... My O fan can heardly be heard at all; I have to go the end grate to actually hear if it's running or not. |
It's interesting. The fan noise db level of the Kronos and Oasys were both measured recently and found to be similar (albeit weighted differently in frequency), yet there are much more complaints about the K fan noise. Searching through the O forums I found only 2 threads about it. So have people become pickier about fan noise in the last few years? Or were people just more forgiving of it in light of the sheer awesomeness of the O? Conversely are people less forgiving of the K? Something to ponder...
I don't have a Kronos myself (yet?) but I believe it when some people say they have issues with the fan noise. I don't think they are being overly picky; rather I think the fans being used have a wide variation in noise output. In other words, the specs are not very tight so some people get quiet fans and some get loud ones (29db +/- 10db for example). Maybe Korg just didnt specify a fan with tight enough specs. Then again tight specs always mean more cost... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|