 |
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aron Platinum Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 977 Location: Hawaii
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:45 pm Post subject: Why is the Jupiter great for live use? |
|
|
Not interested in people playing at home. I want hear why this keyboard iis good for LIVE gigs. Assuming the sounds are good what does the hardware offer a live performance player from someone that really gigs with it? _________________ Kronos, PC361 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Devnor Junior Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes "Assuming the sounds are good" so what might be important to a live player?
Tone remain? Yes
Quick access to sounds? There's a few different ways to select sounds...that row of buttons, datawheel, inc/dec live sets within a registration, registration buttons on the lower panel, footswitch.
Powerful controllers? D-beam, assignable knobs, tone blender + shuffle.
Quick splits/layers? Dedicated split buttons for lower & solo sections.
Vivid, easy to read display
Dedicated transpose & octave buttons
XLR & TRS outputs
15 second boot time which includes every instrument in the machine -available instantly
Superior industrial design & build quality
After all this time I don't understand the need to put products in little boxes but assuming everyone isn't trying to be the next Jordan Rudess using a single instrument (which he doesn't do anymore) wouldnt you agree these features would benefit any musician? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aron Platinum Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 977 Location: Hawaii
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's what I wanted to hear. Are you using it live?
> Tone remain
Yes, this is important. Is it just like the Kronos where you can go from single to layered to split with no changes in fx?
> Dedicated split buttons for lower & solo sections
Yes, but when you do a split or layer, is there a way to have only your chosen sounds appear in a list? That's one thing I have always wanted.
I have played it several times. I still wish it had assignable knobs and sliders like a PC3 or Kronos. I pretty much agree with most of the reviews about what it lacks. However what I wanted to know (and what I may have missed), is what makes it a live performance keyboard. That's how they push the product, so I was wondering what makes it easier to use than another keyboard for live use.
I pretty much agree with this review.
http://www.musicradar.com/gear/all/keys-synths/synthesizers-compact-synthesizers/jupiter-80-487265/review _________________ Kronos, PC361
Last edited by aron on Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:40 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cello Platinum Member

Joined: 11 Jun 2009 Posts: 2109 Location: Glasgow, UK
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think there's a broad confusion about what 'performance' means re the JP-80.
The obvious one is that of the live, gigging musician. It is amazingly quick to edit on the fly with buttons that introduce new splits, solos, or tone blending with the pedal, all assignable per live set and registration. So yes, it can be immensely useful for the guy doing gigs.
But the other 'performance' (which is the one I think that generally folks don't get), is that of performing with a highly responsive instrument for the guy in the studio (which is me!).
Imagine a cello - there are lots of tricks like a Bartok Pizz - very different to a normal pizz (no synth does this by the way, but the JP-80 is the closest I've ever got - and that was in the shop!). Then there's col legno, etc, etc. That's the performance bit I'm talking about.
The JP-80 extends the sonic possibilities for you to perform with whether it's live or in the studio.
I agree Roland is pushing the gigging element but for me, it is massively more useful than any other similarly priced, recently released performance/workstation hybrids out there at the moment.
It truly is a musical marvel, IMHO. _________________ Plugged in:Fantom G6, Jupiter-80, V-Synth GTv2, XV5050, SRV330, Symphony Module, ER mk2, D3200, iMS20, iPolysix, Alesis M1 Active Mk2
www.soundcloud.com/ngowans
Repository of Sound |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aron Platinum Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 977 Location: Hawaii
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The obvious one is that of the live, gigging musician. It is amazingly quick to edit on the fly with buttons that introduce new splits, solos, or tone blending with the pedal, all assignable per live set and registration. So yes, it can be immensely useful for the guy doing gigs. |
Does it have a floating split? That's one of the things Mainstage has that I liked. I need to check out the manual a bit more.
>But the other 'performance' (which is the one I think that generally folks don't get), is that of performing with a highly responsive instrument for the guy in the studio (which is me!).
Yes. I see-that could clarify things. I assumed that Performance meant live - but maybe not. Good one! _________________ Kronos, PC361 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aron Platinum Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 977 Location: Hawaii
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK I checked the manual. Here's some cool things I didn't know about.
MIDI File->Arpeggiator. Nice idea.
Tone Blender is a cool idea - up to 3 parameters - but the coolest is that you can set it to random.
The manual says that Tone Remain may not work for some effects, but it's still cool to have.
The audio player can change speed and pitch! Another very useful feature.
Harmony Intelligence module - another cool feature can be applied to the upper part to harmonize in real-time based on the lower part chord.
The solo and percussion seem to share a common reverb - this is a little weird but usable. _________________ Kronos, PC361 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sani Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2002 Posts: 339 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aron wrote: |
The solo and percussion seem to share a common reverb - this is a little weird but usable. |
Personally, I would prefer if all the parts would share one single reverb and instead of having separate reverbs for the lower and upper liveset, I'd rather see a second aux effect like chorus/delay or something similar.
IMHO, the task of the reverb is to put the final sound into an acoustic space. And if you create a final layer/split, I don't really see why each part should use a different reverb. On the other side, if you want a common reverb, it means that you have to program three separate reverbs to the same parameters instead of routing them all to the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Devnor Junior Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| All parts/tones share the same reverb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sani Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2002 Posts: 339 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Devnor wrote: | | All parts/tones share the same reverb. |
No.
When I'm talking about parts, I mean the parts of a registration.
So we have 4 parts which make a registration and two parts have their own reverb (both live sets have a separate reverb) and the percussion and solo part use one reverb for both parts.
Put simply, 4 parts, three different reverb sources. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Devnor Junior Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The simplified drawings in the documentation certainly makes it appear there are 3 reverbs. If you examine the logic behind the coloring of FX signal flow (blue FX sends to MFX within live sets programmed as part of the live set or the blue send to 3 block solo/perc layer FX block as programmed as part of the registration) it appears to me there is only 1 reverb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sani Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2002 Posts: 339 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Devnor,
I'm confused now since you're the one who owns the instrument, not me.
JP80 Owners manual, P.11:
| Quote: | | By using the Upper Part and Lower Part simultaneously, you can create powerful sounds that use up to eight effects and two reverbs simultaneously. |
Further on the same page:
| Quote: | | The Solo Part and the Percussion Part also have their own independent compressor, EQ, and delay, and both the Solo Part and Percussion Part also each have their own reverb |
This is obviously a mistake. (Roland should correct it).
On P. 12 you have a diagram which shows clearly that:
a) each live set has its own reverb
b) the percussion and solo parts share both one reverb
It makes a total of three different reverbs which are used in a full 4 part registration (four part meaning: perch, lower, upper, solo).
After all, you could easily try by yourself and create a registration by using all four parts and you should realize that you are able to create different reverbs for the upper, lower part and one commonly used reverb for the remaining perc/solo part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Devnor Junior Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have spent little time with reverb except for lowering the sends so you could be entirely right. According the pages you referenced you're probably right LOL. I'll play with setting and let you know.
As a Jupiter owner I'm on an island. No discussion between owners at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aron Platinum Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 977 Location: Hawaii
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
> As a Jupiter owner I'm on an island. No discussion between owners at all.
Devnor,
I know of at least 2 people you could talk to and they would love to talk!
I think Sani might be the first that will actually start programming the Jupiter and I look forward to hearing what will become of it. _________________ Kronos, PC361 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cello Platinum Member

Joined: 11 Jun 2009 Posts: 2109 Location: Glasgow, UK
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aron wrote: | > As a Jupiter owner I'm on an island. No discussion between owners at all.
Devnor,
I know of at least 2 people you could talk to and they would love to talk!
I think Sani might be the first that will actually start programming the Jupiter and I look forward to hearing what will become of it. |
Make that three  _________________ Plugged in:Fantom G6, Jupiter-80, V-Synth GTv2, XV5050, SRV330, Symphony Module, ER mk2, D3200, iMS20, iPolysix, Alesis M1 Active Mk2
www.soundcloud.com/ngowans
Repository of Sound |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sani Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2002 Posts: 339 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aron wrote: |
I think Sani might be the first that will actually start programming the Jupiter and I look forward to hearing what will become of it. |
Aron,
I have to disappoint you, but I will not buy the Jupiter. I own a Fantom G, I play live exclusively (did work also extensive in the studio before) and the Jupiter doesn't fit my needs. A sampler is a must for me and I gig only with one instrument. But since I have some serious concerns about some things on the Fantom G and generally about Roland, I simply follow what they bring on the market and what has or has not changed.
We have discussed about this already before. I said, I don't really need to play the instrument to understand from the manual what it can or cannot do from the technical aspect.
A later add on:
It doesn't mean that I hate either the jp80 or Roland as a company.
Last edited by sani on Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|