|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Cpilot Senior Member
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 Posts: 427
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I did a lot of playing around with the Overb parameters, using Cathedral Organ and still couldn't get it to sound right. Switched to Hall or Smooth Hall - perfect. Sounded just like being in a cathedral. Played all sorts, Pomp and Circumstance no. 4, Bach, War March of the priests etc. I think I'll stick to Hall. I should add that I was sitting 6 feet from a pair of full range speakers spaced 12 feet apart in a room 27 feet long. I imagine it would sound quite different with a couple of amps or a pair of near field monitors in a control room or studio.
Bryan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zeroesque Senior Member
Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Posts: 451 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cpilot wrote: | I should add that I was sitting 6 feet from a pair of full range speakers spaced 12 feet apart in a room 27 feet long. |
My mixing space is a little larger than a closet, ha! Unfortunately for me, most of my critical listening is done with headphones.
Also, convention states that your head should form an equilateral triangle with your stereo monitors. Not that this should cause you to judge the O-Verb much differently (which I do prefer when compared to the older Korg spaces). _________________ Kronos 61, Kronos2-88, Hammond B3, Baldwin SD-10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cpilot Senior Member
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 Posts: 427
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking about what I posted a little while afterwards and realised I had got it wrong, so I measured it. The speakers are placed 10 feet apart and I was seven feet away from both. A bit closer to an equilateral triangle. It's the room that's 12 feet wide so that's where I got confused (I'm always a bit confused anyway). I could sit further back but there's a table in the way.
Bryan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RonF Platinum Member
Joined: 04 Jul 2002 Posts: 1179 Location: San Diego, CA USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Assuming you are using near field monitors, 10 feet apart is too wide for proper near field monitoring anyways, IMO. That triangle should be closer in at all 3 points. I wouldn't want perhaps more than 6 feet in each direction. A bit less may be better still. _________________ http://soundcloud.com/ronf-3/sets/ronf-music
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr1zAKpV_F226LQZrUYGPQA
Favorite Gear: Kronos 61, M3, Z1, Radias, KPro, KP3, Moog Voyager, Foogers, Virus TI, Jupiter 80, Integra7, GAIA, SPD-30, Kiwi 106, RE-201, MC808, RC505, MV8800, DSI P6 and OB6 and P12, Ensoniq SQ80, EMU MP-7, Eventide H7600, Eclipse, SPACE, Pitchfactor, Timefactor, Looperlative LP-1, Axe FX Ultra, Nord Modular, DSI Tetra, Tempest, PEK, JDXA, Eurorack Modular, Octatrack, MDUW, Monomachine, A4, RYTM, Waldorf Q Phoenix, MWXTk, Blofeld, TR8. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JPWC Platinum Member
Joined: 29 Oct 2010 Posts: 638 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't know what monitor placement or even the JP-80 have to do with Overb, but............
I do my critical monitoring (mixing and EQ with effects) in a 3 foot triangle. KRK's
But when jamming I use Mackie SRM450's spread at about 10 feet.
I am trying to suggest your monitor placement should match your application.
And when I am getting ready for a gig with my guitar playing friends, I use headphone with me in the right ear and other heavy metal guitar CD's playing the left.
Maybe the point here is that without proper monitoring you can not judge the sound quality or mix of any effect, including the Overb. _________________ Kronos-6, Krome, M3, Radias, KingKorg, microKorg, KP-2, KP-3, KO-1, KO-1 PRO, Karma, microX, monotron, monotribe, PadCONTROL, Wavedrum Mini, Volca Keys, Beats, Bass, Sample, monotron Duo & Delay, microArranger, M1, Wavestation, Volca Sample, Keys, Beats & Bass, MS-20
JD-XA, JD-Xi, Aira (system 1, TB3, TR8, MX-1), Prophet 12, Mopho X4, Jupiter-80, FA-06, D50, CS1x, CZ101, DX200, AN200, analogFOUR, MachineDrum, MonoMachine, Motif XF6, Virus Snow, Nord Lead 2X, OP-1, MFOS, Tenori-on, QY100, QY70, meeblip se, miniBrute, microBrute, Bass Station 2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philmagnotta Full Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2007 Posts: 132 Location: Rhode Island, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some thoughts about digital reverberators...
First, as regards the O-verb as a mastering verb. Well if you mean on the master bus of kronos, then sure, it will be very serviceable.
If you mean as master for audio being brought-in to kronos, it depends on the source/arrangement.
Most important is the fact that a reverb processor requires experience/skill for best results. Although most units have algorithms and presets designed for getting you to various types of source scenarios for the material to be processed.
Like compressors, they do require specific adjustments relative to the material at hand.
As for the technical quality of any unit, even if you were using Briscati units there is no guarantee that the verb will be properly adjusted for a particular application unless you've acquired some lengthy period of experiment and study regarding their usage.
Since the O-verb is not the most advanced- best quality verb ever produced, you have to know how to achieve a best compromise solution.
BTW, the Kurzweil KDFX processor included in their present keyboards has already been established as a top performing unit- both as was implemented in the rack unit and on their keyboards.
It is not true to say that the o-verb is the best ever placed in a keyboard.
Nevertheless, any reverb unit in a current top of the line workstation will do the job- if you know how. Besides many excellent recordings have made using digital reverbs that were not up the standards of o-verb. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aron Platinum Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 1549 Location: Hawaii
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | the Kurzweil KDFX processor included in their present keyboards has already been established as a top performing unit- both as was implemented in the rack unit and on their keyboards |
Are you saying that the verb in my PC3 is better than the Korg reverb? Just wondering. I haven't spent enough time comparing. _________________ Korg Kronos, RD-88, Yamaha VL1, Deep Mind 6, Korg Kross, author of unrealBook for iPad. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philmagnotta Full Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2007 Posts: 132 Location: Rhode Island, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
aron wrote: | Quote: | the Kurzweil KDFX processor included in their present keyboards has already been established as a top performing unit- both as was implemented in the rack unit and on their keyboards |
Are you saying that the verb in my PC3 is better than the Korg reverb? Just wondering. I haven't spent enough time comparing. |
Yes, but with further explanation.
First, the KDFX rack unit was widely accepted and praised as a studio and mastering effects processor and still is. However, that units analog input/output circuitry and the A-D, D-A converters are part of the whole unit. I am not certain about those circuits as compared to the the ones on-board the pc3 whether they be the same or less.
I'll assume that both the Kronos and pc3 have quality analog and converter circuits, even if there are quality differences between those units.
Apart from the Kronos's greater number of inserts, etc., Reverb is the topic here so, if we had the Kronos and pc3 side by side in a high quality mastering chain and fed both of them the same material through their inputs and through their reverb processing sections and out, you'd find the KDFX preferred by most experienced professionals with well equipped studios.
Certain expensive units are expensive because they are proven in the field to be superior sounding and the KDFX has been fully ported with more memory processing than the original, so yes its a better sounding unit than Kronos. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kevin Nolan Approved Merchant
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 2524 Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agree with the other posters - Overb is excellent. Its 'engine' is certainly the equal of the TC Electronics M2000 (my best hardware reverb) - a respectable reverb - and of course it has very good editable parameters making it adaptable to various different scenarios.
As a test - choose the 'Infinite' preset and listen to how smooth the reverb remains even on that setting (or other very long reverb times). It really shows how capable and smooth the reverb generating engine is - it is noticeably better than the other reverbs on board.
I agree with Dan - the 750+ effects presets (given as a free upgrade to the OASYS and seemingly on board the Kronos by default) are an exquisite package - there's a lot of excellent and very usable programming and configuration gone into to those presets. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JPROBERTLA Senior Member
Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 483 Location: New Orleans
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kevin Nolan wrote:
Agree with the other posters - Overb is excellent. Its 'engine' is certainly the equal of the TC Electronics M2000 (my best hardware reverb) - a respectable reverb - and of course it has very good editable parameters making it adaptable to various different scenarios.
As a test - choose the 'Infinite' preset and listen to how smooth the reverb remains even on that setting (or other very long reverb times). It really shows how capable and smooth the reverb generating engine is - it is noticeably better than the other reverbs on board.
I agree with Dan - the 750+ effects presets (given as a free upgrade to the OASYS and seemingly on board the Kronos by default) are an exquisite package - there's a lot of excellent and very usable programming and configuration gone into to those presets.]
In the second paragraph you mentioned an "Infinite" preset. Where is this? On the FX pull down menus, there in only one Overb.[/b] _________________ JP
_________________________________________
Kronos2-88, Behringer XR18, Turbosound IP2000 (x2), dbx DriveRack 260, KRK Rokit 8s, Mackie CFX16, Mackie SRM450(x2), Mackie SRS1500 (x2), BBE processors (x4), Roland VSR 880 (x2), Alto TS210, Alto TX10 (x3) and SoundForge |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cpilot Senior Member
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 Posts: 427
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One effect that seems to be conspicuous by its absence is convolution. However, the amount of processing required would probably kill the Kronos. Maybe we'll have to wait for Kronos 2 with a Core I7 or something similar. In the end though, reverb comes down to personal taste like anything else. Our ears and perception are different for everyone.
Bryan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EXer Platinum Member
Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Posts: 558 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JPROBERTLA wrote: | In the second paragraph you mentioned an "Infinite" preset. Where is this? On the FX pull down menus, there in only one Overb.[/b] |
For each Effect you have a list of Presets.
100: Overb > P14: Infinite Space
(cf. p.256 of the Voice Name List). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marianghioda Junior Member
Joined: 21 Apr 2011 Posts: 68 Location: Vancouver BC
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great topic, reminded me the importance of reverbs. On the same note, what are the other effects (delay, compressor, etc.) that you guys find newer and better quality, comparable with Overb?
BTW, THIS is what we should focus on in this forum, not bitchin and whining about every little thing that we can't figure out in 5 minutes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cpilot Senior Member
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 Posts: 427
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I played around with Overb yet again and FINALLY got it to sound the way I wanted. Had to do lots of adjusting with the damping and reverb time. Lot of fiddling though. I suppose I could save the preset after adjustments but it's much easier just to select Hall and that sounds right without any changes. This only applies to the Cathedral Organ though. Be a lot different for other stuff. The Operation Guide is a bit misleading. The paragraph about selecting effects presets just gives information about Insert effects as though you couldn't use presets with Master or Total effects.
Bryan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|