View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Darryll
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Posts: 45 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 9:45 pm Post subject: Aftertouch |
|
|
Some websites say with aftertouch and some say without. KorgUSA is not clear on this. Does it have aftertouch or not? And if not, please explain the logic behind that decision. Why would a flagship analog synth not have aftertouch? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
megamarkd Platinum Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2017 Posts: 635 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's not mentioned when the keybed is described, with only velocity being mentioned. And the word aftertouch appears nowhere in the manual, so I'm gonna take an informed guess and say no it doesn't have doesn't have aftertouch.
Aftertouch adds a bit to the cost I think. _________________ Stuff I'm using: Umm right now, well there's a Volca Drum, a Micro Freak, an ADX-1, a Pulse, a Blofeld, a UNO Drum, KeyStep/Beatstep Pro/Keystep Pro (one of each), a Circuit, a LiveTrak L-12 and this nonsense: The Brief-case as it was about a bit over a year ago (the the complete ridiculous GAS monster collection here)and here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
runningman67 Platinum Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2011 Posts: 1663 Location: Manchester UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Synthee Senior Member
Joined: 21 Apr 2013 Posts: 298 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe its the marketing term: "natural touch keyboard" that confuse some people. _________________ Korg Kronos 2 88 ; The River ; Cubase 10.5 Pro ; PC Win 10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darryll
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Posts: 45 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like I'm not the only one that's confused. So does "natural touch keyboard" mean aftertouch? Because in my mind, aftertouch is a natural way to play any pro-level synth. I am a Korg man from the M1 days. I owned a M1, T1, 01/W, etc.). I now have a Kronos 88 AND Kronos 61. LOVE THEM BOTH!! If they are selling the prologue as having 'the same' key-bed as the Kronos, then it should have aftertouch. Right???
Again, can someone give a definitive answer here. And if it does not; please help me to understand WHY NOT. Maybe I need to have a paradigm shift in how I approach 'professional' boards.
Aftertouch surely doesn't add that much to the cost of an instrument. Korg not designing aftertouch in a product as good as a the KingKorg or as good as the prologue appears to be is crazy IMO. That would push me from a prologue purchase to a DSI REV2 purchase. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jimknopf Platinum Member
Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Posts: 3374
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The definitve aswer is in Korg's own spec sheet: Prologue has no aftertouch.
That's quite a weird letdown for a polyphonic synth these days. _________________ Kronos 73 - Moog Voyager RME - Moog LP TE - Behringer Model D - Prophet 6 - Roland Jupiter Xm - Rhodes Stage 73 Mk I - Elektron Analog Rytm MkII - Roland TR-6s - Cubase 12 Pro + Groove Agent 5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voip Platinum Member
Joined: 27 Nov 2014 Posts: 3792
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At a guess, aftertouch would add something like $200-$300 to the cost, provided the keybed accepted the sensor strip without modification, which ought to be the case if it's the same as the Kronos 2 61. An opportunity for aftermarket upgrades, perhaps?
Scrub that. Based on the MIDI implementation chart, the Prologue neither transmits nor receives MIDI CC#02 (aftertouch). There are, however, plenty of other CC#s assigned to various modulation types that could usefully be controlled by an aftertouch sensing MIDI CC# generator. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|