|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
GregC Platinum Member
Joined: 15 May 2002 Posts: 9451 Location: Discovery Bay (San Francisco Bay Area)
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Liviou2004 wrote: | GregC wrote: | Liviou2004 wrote: | Well, I did several tests. Sounds alone, and inside SEQ (as suggested by Greg) :
Given the same settings (time, Wet/Dry, etc...), I didn't hear the least difference between effect 077 and effect 078. 078, as a long delay, produce the exact same qualitiy of sound as 077.
I tried in SEQ mode (with Metronome and so on) and the behavior of echoes was the same in both cases.
So, if you heard a difference, could you please tell me what settings you are using ? |
big diff in delay times. These are factory defaults:
Fx 77 : 600 1000 400
Fx 78: 1600 2000 1400
If your K does not show this, your factory default settings got changed |
Of course factory defaults are different. But that's not the point here. The point is the fact that Fx 78 covers all the delay times range of the FX 77, and adds to that all its own range. So, my conclusion is : FX 77 is useless !! |
I misunderstood you, and I won't quibble technically.
I am certain the two FX behave differently , act differently, on a song or a sound. Thats my context.
Thus 77 and 78 are not redundant or 'useless' _________________ Kronos 88. MODX8
Achieve your musical dreams
https://soundcloud.com/user-898236994 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobTheDog Platinum Member
Joined: 21 May 2007 Posts: 1535
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you have 2 versions of the same delay with different maximum delay times you gave one of two possibilities:
1. One uses more ram than the other
2. They use the same ram and the sample rate of the longer delay is less.
So if your delay time required is less than the max of the smaller delay then choose that. Seems straightforward to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Liviou2004 Platinum Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017 Posts: 1150 Location: France
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
GregC wrote: | Liviou2004 wrote: | GregC wrote: | Liviou2004 wrote: | Well, I did several tests. Sounds alone, and inside SEQ (as suggested by Greg) :
Given the same settings (time, Wet/Dry, etc...), I didn't hear the least difference between effect 077 and effect 078. 078, as a long delay, produce the exact same qualitiy of sound as 077.
I tried in SEQ mode (with Metronome and so on) and the behavior of echoes was the same in both cases.
So, if you heard a difference, could you please tell me what settings you are using ? |
big diff in delay times. These are factory defaults:
Fx 77 : 600 1000 400
Fx 78: 1600 2000 1400
If your K does not show this, your factory default settings got changed |
Of course factory defaults are different. But that's not the point here. The point is the fact that Fx 78 covers all the delay times range of the FX 77, and adds to that all its own range. So, my conclusion is : FX 77 is useless !! |
I misunderstood you, and I won't quibble technically.
I am certain the two FX behave differently , act differently, on a song or a sound. Thats my context.
Thus 77 and 78 are not redundant or 'useless' |
Sure, I won't quibble technically either, it's not the most important. And we can suppose that Korg as put these two effects inside for a good reason.
But the reason why I have oppened this thread is that I do not hear any difference, be in Prog mode or Seq mode. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StephenKay KARMA Developer Approved Merchant
Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 2979 Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Essentially, who cares? Korg included both of them because there is some difference or trade-off between them. There is no way that a hugely lengthened delay time does not cause some sort of trade-off. If you can't hear or find the difference in usage meters, then the end result is this:
- If you want a shorter delay time that is provided by the short version, use it.
- If you need a really long delay time that cannot be provided by the first one, use the long version.
I understand you're trying to understand what difference there might be, but in the end, you're wasting your time, just use whichever one you want. _________________ Stephen Kay - KARMA Developer • Karma-Lab - karma-lab.com
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|