|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Bachus Platinum Member
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 3127
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:29 pm Post subject: Gadgets... sound quallity |
|
|
How would you rate the quallity of the Korg gadgets sounds and effects compared to Hardware like the Korg Kronos, or even compared to high end Vst's and effects? _________________ Korg Kronos 2/88 , Genos, Mainstage3 +VSTsu, ipad pro, GSi Gemini, Roland Integra 7, Jupiter Xm, Yamaha motif XS rack, Ketron SD90.
www.keyszone.boards.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hankastral
Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Posts: 17 Location: Manchester UK
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can get a pro sound quicker in gadget than in most DAW's using VST's. Sure, synths like Serum have more 'amazing' single presets but getting these sounds to fit in a mix is not easy. gadget excels at this - each different instrument gels with the others. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveturner777
Joined: 28 Mar 2017 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would say that the sound quality is EXCELLENT and they do sit very nicely in the mix. They are simplified enough you can just rip in and start writing very effectively.
However, the main difference you will note is far less depth of configuration than your hardware choices. If you value individualisation of a tone within the tone generator then a synth VST or hardware is going to be superior.
Of course, you can use Gadget sounds and individualise them other ways using effects or your channel strip or whatever.
But your question is difficult because I think the breadth of functionality across the Gadget suite is possibly also superior to most single hardware elements. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveturner777
Joined: 28 Mar 2017 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would say that the sound quality is EXCELLENT and they do sit very nicely in the mix. They are simplified enough you can just rip in and start writing very effectively.
However, the main difference you will note is far less depth of configuration than your hardware choices. If you value individualisation of a tone within the tone generator then a synth VST or hardware is going to be superior.
Of course, you can use Gadget sounds and individualise them other ways using effects or your channel strip or whatever.
But your question is difficult because I think the breadth of functionality across the Gadget suite is possibly also superior to most single hardware elements. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|