Korg’s Professional Arranger - A Series Comparison
Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever
-
- Korg Italy
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 12:07 pm
Korg’s Professional Arranger - A Series Comparison
Hi,
Lurking here, and not yet sure about which Professional Arranger is right for you? Korg Product Specialist Luciano Minetti explains the fundamentals of what an arranger is and highlights the key differences between the keyboards currently offered in our Pa Series lineup: Pa300, Pa600, Pa700, Pa1000, and Pa4x.
Comparison Video
Here is a comparison chart:
Comparison Chart
Enjoy!
The Korg Italy Team
Lurking here, and not yet sure about which Professional Arranger is right for you? Korg Product Specialist Luciano Minetti explains the fundamentals of what an arranger is and highlights the key differences between the keyboards currently offered in our Pa Series lineup: Pa300, Pa600, Pa700, Pa1000, and Pa4x.
Comparison Video
Here is a comparison chart:
Comparison Chart
Enjoy!
The Korg Italy Team
Interesting video Paulo.
Anyone interested in any Korg Arranger would be advised to check on when the model was released.
The 300 and 600 are now very old.
The 700 and 1000 both date back to 2017 and are only on v1.5 of their operating system hence a major update is long overdue.
The 4X is older than both the 700 and 1000 and it has been two years since it received its major OS update.
I am no fan of Yamaha but since 2018 they have released the Genos, SX 600, 700 and 900 models.
What do we get from Korg.....a host of new synths?
Anyone interested in any Korg Arranger would be advised to check on when the model was released.
The 300 and 600 are now very old.
The 700 and 1000 both date back to 2017 and are only on v1.5 of their operating system hence a major update is long overdue.
The 4X is older than both the 700 and 1000 and it has been two years since it received its major OS update.
I am no fan of Yamaha but since 2018 they have released the Genos, SX 600, 700 and 900 models.
What do we get from Korg.....a host of new synths?
Biggles
Lancashire, UK
Lancashire, UK
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: Korg’s Professional Arranger - A Series Comparison
Pa1000 never was a PA ( "professional?"), because its functions of the StylePlayer of the Pa1000 are not usable with the Songbook as in Style Play mode - but theses functions was ok as we had with previous models Pa500/800 ..etc.Paolo@Korg wrote: .. which Professional Arranger is right for you? ...
This deficiency was reported to Korg Germany immediately after the first delivery of the last model series, but has only been remedied for the Pa4x to this day.
According to Korg Germany, there are no plans for the existing Korg arrangers to fix these deficiencies with an update. This applies above all to the midrange models, because "Lock Keyboard Sets" and with v1.2 "Fill Mode" were added for the Pa4x at least with Update v3.0.
Why does Korg refuse not to correct the faulty and inadequate function to get a professional midrange arranger as we had previously?
--> http://www.korgforums.com/forum/phpBB2/ ... p?t=124449
--> http://www.korgforums.com/forum/phpBB2/ ... p?t=123875
--> http://www.korgforums.com/forum/phpbb2/ ... 76&start=2
Last edited by siebenhirter on Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
kind regards
- siebenhirter, austria -
Interesting facts about styles and stylePlayer functions can be found at http: www.elmarherz.de
- siebenhirter, austria -
Interesting facts about styles and stylePlayer functions can be found at http: www.elmarherz.de
I am pretty sure this video is Korg's attempt to flog as many old keyboards as possible before releasing the new model. There is an accent on the fact that the more expensive keyboards sound better (and it is a fact, for sure). They are actually promoting pa4x before they release pa5x (or whatever they call it), so the retailers could sell as many as possible pa4x's to be prepared for the new model... speculating here, of cause, but the photos of the new PA5x model from their factory makes me honestly believe that it's coming very soon. One of the most stupid actions nowadays would be buying a brand new pa4x - just wait a little bit and you will get the new model for the same moneyBiggles wrote:
Anyone interested in any Korg Arranger would be advised to check on when the model was released.
The 300 and 600 are now very old.
The 700 and 1000 both date back to 2017 and are only on v1.5 of their operating system hence a major update is long overdue.
The 4X is older than both the 700 and 1000 and it has been two years since it received its major OS update.

Last edited by Nemydom on Thu Mar 11, 2021 3:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Hi Paolo,
I would like to express a complaint. The Korg PA-4X/ PA-3X HD Install. Kit is very expensive and rare! At the beginning of it's release the price were about 70-75 Euros and then went up to 175 Euros!! What happened? So expensive??? In this price you must give minimum an 1TB HD also!!
Regards,
Dimitris
I would like to express a complaint. The Korg PA-4X/ PA-3X HD Install. Kit is very expensive and rare! At the beginning of it's release the price were about 70-75 Euros and then went up to 175 Euros!! What happened? So expensive??? In this price you must give minimum an 1TB HD also!!

Regards,
Dimitris
KORG PA5X 76 + PaAS (MkI) - KORG PA1000 (NEW) - KORG NAUTILUS 73 (NEW) - KORG XE20SP (NEW) - KAWAI VPC1
- karmathanever
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 5:07 am
Paolo must be loving all this
All this stuff is in the stickies above which I am sure the team has scanned....
Videos great for anyone considering arrangers.

](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
All this stuff is in the stickies above which I am sure the team has scanned....
Videos great for anyone considering arrangers.
Yep - at least they'll know what not to do....Watch the GENOS online seminar, this Saturday 13th March. Its free, just register for a place. Then comment here later and see if we can "wake Korg up".

PA4X-76, Karma, WaveDrum GE, Fantom 8 EX
------------------------------------------------------------------
## Please stay safe ##
...and play lots of music
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
## Please stay safe ##
...and play lots of music

------------------------------------------------------------------
Whilst Iam hoping a new 5X is soon to be released selling 4X at a premium sucks.Nemydom wrote:I am pretty sure this video is Korg's attempt to flog as many old keyboards as possible before releasing the new model. There is an accent on the fact that the more expensive keyboards sound better (and it is a fact, for sure). They are actually promoting pa4x before they release pa5x (or whatever they call it), so the retailers could sell as many as possible pa4x's to be prepared for the new model... speculating here, of cause, but the photos of the new PA5x model from their factory makes me honestly believe that it's coming very soon. One of the most stupid actions nowadays would be buying a brand new pa4x - just wait a little bit and you will get the new model for the same moneyBiggles wrote:
Anyone interested in any Korg Arranger would be advised to check on when the model was released.
The 300 and 600 are now very old.
The 700 and 1000 both date back to 2017 and are only on v1.5 of their operating system hence a major update is long overdue.
The 4X is older than both the 700 and 1000 and it has been two years since it received its major OS update.
I would be pretty pi55ed off if I bought a keyboard and a new version came out a few months later
My advice to anyone considering a PA is Do Not buy one.
Certainly avoid a 300 and 600 and only buy a 700 or 1000 after a major OS update is released.
Biggles
Lancashire, UK
Lancashire, UK
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:01 pm
Professional arrangers - Pa1000/700 not fit for purpose
This may be true for the Pa4x, but for the Pa1000/700 it is certainly not true. For a subsequent model, it should be checked beforehand whether and which functions have been left out again, because such deficiencies have not yet been remedied with an update for these models. If the same thing happens with a successor model, you have the same problem as is known from the Pa1000/700!Nemydom wrote:.. the most stupid actions nowadays would be buying a brand new pa4x - just wait a little bit and you will get the new model for the same money....
.. .. and if the above deficiencies really are corrected with an update!!Biggles wrote: ... certainly avoid a 300 and 600 and only buy a 700 or 1000 after a major OS update is released....
kind regards
- siebenhirter, austria -
Interesting facts about styles and stylePlayer functions can be found at http: www.elmarherz.de
- siebenhirter, austria -
Interesting facts about styles and stylePlayer functions can be found at http: www.elmarherz.de
Re: Professional arrangers - Pa1000/700 not fit for purpose
Whole heartedly agreesiebenhirter wrote:.. .. and if the above deficiencies really are corrected with an update!!Biggles wrote: ... certainly avoid a 300 and 600 and only buy a 700 or 1000 after a major OS update is released....
Biggles
Lancashire, UK
Lancashire, UK
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:01 pm
Comparison video instead missing Updatin midrange arranger
I do not consider the recurring speculations about operational processes in connection with new models in this user forum to be expedient.Nemydom wrote:.. this video is Korg's attempt to flog as many old keyboards as possible before releasing the new model. There is an accent on the fact that the more expensive keyboards sound better (and it is a fact, for sure)...
You can take the Korg video as it is - a comparison and nothing else. Regardless of whether and how new keyboards will sound at some point, it presently is interesting that the deficiencies that have been compensated in an update in the Pa4x have not also been done in the midrange models for more than four years, although they are still advertised in that comparison.
These models are not speculation and the shortcomings have been known for years (both no accents but real facts), but Korg does not provide an update, but a comparison video - what does Korg really think of this video?
Maybe we get an answer and the long overdue update so as not to have to worry about the comparison video or to cause pointless speculations.
kind regards
- siebenhirter, austria -
Interesting facts about styles and stylePlayer functions can be found at http: www.elmarherz.de
- siebenhirter, austria -
Interesting facts about styles and stylePlayer functions can be found at http: www.elmarherz.de
I posted something a bit negative a few days ago and I was wrong to do so. On reflection I am more than happy with my 4X and 1000, the best money that I have ever spent. Never had one problem.
Today I downloaded (free) “It’s a Heartache” Bonnie Tyler. Converted to a style using Converter Bot on 4X and 1000. The results were fabulous, unbelievable on both machines. Just a few observations since that post.
1 I feel sorry for posters that are not happy and getting no help from Korg regarding updates to solve their problems.
2 I am happy, Harry (what would we do without him ?) is happy.
3 But Biggles hit the nail on the head. What do you need from a new keyboard ? Some need more than others. I am basic, others need much more. We are all different but that should not stop us supporting those that are not happy and would like updates.
Where does that leave a new buyer ? How does he choose a keyboard for his needs ? Sorry for being very negative earlier.
Take care
Today I downloaded (free) “It’s a Heartache” Bonnie Tyler. Converted to a style using Converter Bot on 4X and 1000. The results were fabulous, unbelievable on both machines. Just a few observations since that post.
1 I feel sorry for posters that are not happy and getting no help from Korg regarding updates to solve their problems.
2 I am happy, Harry (what would we do without him ?) is happy.
3 But Biggles hit the nail on the head. What do you need from a new keyboard ? Some need more than others. I am basic, others need much more. We are all different but that should not stop us supporting those that are not happy and would like updates.
Where does that leave a new buyer ? How does he choose a keyboard for his needs ? Sorry for being very negative earlier.
Take care
- Musicwithharry
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:58 am
- Location: Anamosa, IA
- Contact:
I am happy with the PA700 and all of my other Korg gear. It serves me well and with programming, I can get even more out of it.taichi wrote:I posted something a bit negative a few days ago and I was wrong to do so. On reflection I am more than happy with my 4X and 1000, the best money that I have ever spent. Never had one problem.
Today I downloaded (free) “It’s a Heartache” Bonnie Tyler. Converted to a style using Converter Bot on 4X and 1000. The results were fabulous, unbelievable on both machines. Just a few observations since that post.
1 I feel sorry for posters that are not happy and getting no help from Korg regarding updates to solve their problems.
2 I am happy, Harry (what would we do without him ?) is happy.
3 But Biggles hit the nail on the head. What do you need from a new keyboard ? Some need more than others. I am basic, others need much more. We are all different but that should not stop us supporting those that are not happy and would like updates.
Where does that leave a new buyer ? How does he choose a keyboard for his needs ? Sorry for being very negative earlier.
Take care
Korg would do well to look at the other companies to improve their own gear. I am sure that they do keep close tabs on the competition, but there are features on the PSRSX700/900 that would certainly put the PA700/1000 over the top, especially with the EFX routings.
There are a couple of things that I wish would change about the PA700, but by and large, it is a powerful instrument that you can get a lot out of. This will require programming on some of the things. Fortunately, I am okay with that

Korg should offer more updates so keep up a bit and maybe listen to their customer base a bit more. After all, they are designing gear for us to buy and use. I am sure that they do, but maybe they should do more.
Grace,
Harry
Alesis Vortex Keytar, Alesis QS6.2, Alesis QSR, Alesis SR-16, Behringer Deepmind-12, Ensoniq Avista 7600, Ensoniq VFX, Ensoniq VFX-SD, Ensoniq SQ1+, (2) Ensoniq SQ-R+/32, Korg i3 (2020 Version), (2) Korg Kross 1-61, (2) Korg Kross 1-88, Korg Minilogue XD, Korg Minilogue XD Module, Korg M50-61, Korg PA700, Korg X5DR, Korg Z3, Kurzweil SP1, Lowrey EZP3 (bascially a Kawai), Roland D-05, Roland E-09, Waldorf Streichfett, Yamaha Reface CP, Yamaha Reface CS, Yamaha Reface DX, Yamaha Reface YC
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 8:19 pm
I think there’s a couple of areas that Korg could do with improving...
Firstly, there’s a few legitimate complaints about lost software functionality which, seeing as the legacy code for the function exists, shouldn’t be a major re-write for the OS. If a new hardware model and total re-write aren’t being fully in the works, what better use of the software team’s time is there?
Then there’s the hardware itself. Korg’s arranger hardware trails its WS hardware in a few significant areas, primarily the extremely poor insert effects architecture (compared to its rivals). It’s going to be an uphill battle for Korg if the next series of arrangers is saddled with the same effects architecture limitations that have plagued it for over a decade. Other arrangers no longer have any difference between the keyboard version of a sound and its style version, as there are sufficient inserts to take the sound that the keyboard section calls up to the style engine along with its associated insert FX.
Although it’s not the total solution, at least the Nautilus’s 12 stereo insert effects gives us enough to use one on every style and keyboard part so there’s no longer any head scratching over how to best utilize the insufficient effects between keyboard and style Parts.
So, I think best case scenario for now is continued attention to just the OS, further refinement of NEXT and the return of some functions inexplicably dropped, and no new hardware until the Nautilus chips can be used...
Firstly, there’s a few legitimate complaints about lost software functionality which, seeing as the legacy code for the function exists, shouldn’t be a major re-write for the OS. If a new hardware model and total re-write aren’t being fully in the works, what better use of the software team’s time is there?
Then there’s the hardware itself. Korg’s arranger hardware trails its WS hardware in a few significant areas, primarily the extremely poor insert effects architecture (compared to its rivals). It’s going to be an uphill battle for Korg if the next series of arrangers is saddled with the same effects architecture limitations that have plagued it for over a decade. Other arrangers no longer have any difference between the keyboard version of a sound and its style version, as there are sufficient inserts to take the sound that the keyboard section calls up to the style engine along with its associated insert FX.
Although it’s not the total solution, at least the Nautilus’s 12 stereo insert effects gives us enough to use one on every style and keyboard part so there’s no longer any head scratching over how to best utilize the insufficient effects between keyboard and style Parts.
So, I think best case scenario for now is continued attention to just the OS, further refinement of NEXT and the return of some functions inexplicably dropped, and no new hardware until the Nautilus chips can be used...