|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
SeedyLee Platinum Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 1377 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 3:24 am Post subject: EG and LFO Modulation Artefacts |
|
|
Hi everyone,
I’m coming from a Kronos and have recently procured both a Kross 2 and a Krome Ex (gotta catch them all!), both of which have the EDS synth engine as opposed to the Kronos’ HD-1, AL-1 etc.
Last night I was creating a simple patch with a single-cycle sawtooth wave, and an EG and LFO modulating cutoff on a 2-pole filter.
What I’m finding though is that the modulations, both the EG with a slow release which closes the filter, and the LFO, is creating artefacts. Not sure if these are aliasing artefacts, or quantisation artefacts caused by the resolution of the EGs and LFOs, but they’re quite noticeable. Particularly at higher frequencies.
Any ideas if these are avoidable or if anything can be done to minimise their effects?
Thanks! _________________ Current Equipment:
Korg Kronos 2 88, Reface CS, Roland JV-1080, TE OP1, Moog Subsequent 37, Korg ARP Odyssey, Allen & Heath Zed 18, Adam F5, MOTU MIDI Express XT, Lexicon MX200 & MPX1, Yamaha QY700, Yamaha AW16G, Tascam DP008ex, Zoom H6, Organelle, Roland J6 & JU06A
Previous: Triton LE 61/Sampling/64MB/4GB SCSI, MS2000BR, Kronos 1 61, Monotribe, NanoKontrol, NanoKeys, Kaossilator II, Casio HT3000, Roland VP-03, Reface DX, Novation Mininova, MPC One |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SeedyLee Platinum Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 1377 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2024 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
For those who may be interested, there are two things I’ve found useful for alleviating the problem. One is to use two filters in series, with a HPF to filter out some of the low frequency artefacts. The other is to use a key tracker to reduce the amount of LFO modulation at higher frequencies. _________________ Current Equipment:
Korg Kronos 2 88, Reface CS, Roland JV-1080, TE OP1, Moog Subsequent 37, Korg ARP Odyssey, Allen & Heath Zed 18, Adam F5, MOTU MIDI Express XT, Lexicon MX200 & MPX1, Yamaha QY700, Yamaha AW16G, Tascam DP008ex, Zoom H6, Organelle, Roland J6 & JU06A
Previous: Triton LE 61/Sampling/64MB/4GB SCSI, MS2000BR, Kronos 1 61, Monotribe, NanoKontrol, NanoKeys, Kaossilator II, Casio HT3000, Roland VP-03, Reface DX, Novation Mininova, MPC One |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Stesco Approved Merchant
Joined: 11 Dec 2009 Posts: 640 Location: Bucharest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi SeedyLee is true, the Krome/Kross subrate is different comparison with Kronos. For example if use the LFO sine wave and hi speed, the LFO waveform will be slightly modified. Become random. _________________ http://www.danstesco.ro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SeedyLee Platinum Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 1377 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2024 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Dan, that's interesting. Whilst I'm not using any high-frequency LFOs (is that even a meaningful thing to say?), that is indeed what it sounds like. I will need to compare to the Kronos with the same patch settings on HD1.
Out of interest, do you have a reference about the difference in control rates between EDS-X and HD1? _________________ Current Equipment:
Korg Kronos 2 88, Reface CS, Roland JV-1080, TE OP1, Moog Subsequent 37, Korg ARP Odyssey, Allen & Heath Zed 18, Adam F5, MOTU MIDI Express XT, Lexicon MX200 & MPX1, Yamaha QY700, Yamaha AW16G, Tascam DP008ex, Zoom H6, Organelle, Roland J6 & JU06A
Previous: Triton LE 61/Sampling/64MB/4GB SCSI, MS2000BR, Kronos 1 61, Monotribe, NanoKontrol, NanoKeys, Kaossilator II, Casio HT3000, Roland VP-03, Reface DX, Novation Mininova, MPC One |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Stesco Approved Merchant
Joined: 11 Dec 2009 Posts: 640 Location: Bucharest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi SeedyLee,
I don't have all the references related to the differences between the engines either. When we were working on sounds and found something suspicious, we would ask the engineers.
Also the PCM are different even name the same, could be compressed, or optimised at number of notes so that could be reflected on filter behaviour. _________________ http://www.danstesco.ro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SeedyLee Platinum Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 1377 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, that's interesting about the difference in PCM - I really wish companies weren't so opaque about such things. Though now that you mention it, it somewhat confirms my suspicions that the issue may be with the samples being stretch over a greater range, or more compression - that does sound like what I'm perhaps hearing. _________________ Current Equipment:
Korg Kronos 2 88, Reface CS, Roland JV-1080, TE OP1, Moog Subsequent 37, Korg ARP Odyssey, Allen & Heath Zed 18, Adam F5, MOTU MIDI Express XT, Lexicon MX200 & MPX1, Yamaha QY700, Yamaha AW16G, Tascam DP008ex, Zoom H6, Organelle, Roland J6 & JU06A
Previous: Triton LE 61/Sampling/64MB/4GB SCSI, MS2000BR, Kronos 1 61, Monotribe, NanoKontrol, NanoKeys, Kaossilator II, Casio HT3000, Roland VP-03, Reface DX, Novation Mininova, MPC One |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|