Korg Forums Forum Index Korg Forums
A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world.
Moderated Independently.
Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

OSC 2 Harmonics: Bug or Feature ?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg RADIAS / R3
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Extra harmonics: Bug or Feature ?
Bug.
57%
 57%  [ 11 ]
Feature.
42%
 42%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 19

Author Message
nemmo
Senior Member


Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 309

PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:04 am    Post subject: OSC 2 Harmonics: Bug or Feature ? Reply with quote

The idea is to find out if the extra harmonics in OSC 2 are really a problem or are part of the "radias signature sound".

What do you think ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slammah2012
Senior Member


Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 374
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a bug that shouldn't affect to many presets if corrected......
the odds that one would have "sine selected in osc 2" without filters and resonance " the quest for real sine" and be upset of a correction I think are very low.....
_________________
Time Can be Mastered,
"NOW" is the Password....
Currently running, Hammond M3, Yamaha CS80 + MM6, Roland JX-3P + Mkb 1000 + Vk7 + D110, Alesis Quadrasynth plus, Haken Continuum fingerboard, Korg Radias + Lambda, Ensoniq SQ80, Waldorf Blofeld, Creamware Prodyssey + B4000, Use Audio Plugiator, Arp Axxe ....and some soft synths.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nemmo
Senior Member


Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 309

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL, the results are 5 for bug and 5 for feature. Curious thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slammah2012
Senior Member


Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 374
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I said .... the future true capabilities of the machine are at the mercy of its past presetsand patches, Lets get korg to add this harmoniked sine to the pcm list and get a true sine where they say there is to be one...lol
_________________
Time Can be Mastered,
"NOW" is the Password....
Currently running, Hammond M3, Yamaha CS80 + MM6, Roland JX-3P + Mkb 1000 + Vk7 + D110, Alesis Quadrasynth plus, Haken Continuum fingerboard, Korg Radias + Lambda, Ensoniq SQ80, Waldorf Blofeld, Creamware Prodyssey + B4000, Use Audio Plugiator, Arp Axxe ....and some soft synths.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gdh
Senior Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 288
Location: NW Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fix the damn thing Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Unknown Sound
Full Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 129
Location: On a small island just off the coast of an island not to far from Antarctica

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The poll doesn't mean anything because it's can be both a bug and add to the RADIAS character.


Anyway, I sent a bug report to the local Korg distributor asking that it be put through official Korg channels.

I really don't know what sort of response I will get (if any) but at least for my part I have done what I can.

-US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kvnvk
Full Member


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 103
Location: TX

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

what would be the possibility of Korg issuing this as a seperate "stand-alone" update if it is determined by them to be a bug? basically so those who are concerened about it affecting the patches they've created can choose whether or not they want to install the "fix"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nemmo
Senior Member


Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 309

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup, that sounds like a good idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
waytho
Junior Member


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 53
Location: Lynnwood, WA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:48 am    Post subject: I Voted "bug" Reply with quote

because it seems like an obvious oversight by QA at KORG.
Love my Radias, but if I was getting that deep into pure programming - I would care. I like the idea of optional update. . .

waytho
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
radiasofdoom



Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's an annoying bug. I was trying to use the Radias to explain to a synth newbie exactly how the whole thing worked and having the second VCO's sine wave broken didn't help one little bit. If I want it to sound different, I'll do that myself thankyou.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jerrythek
Platinum Member


Joined: 28 Jan 2002
Posts: 2931

PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I checked into this with the developers and this is not a bug, or to be more correct, it is not unintentional. It has to do with the amount of DSP power allocated to the second oscillator, so it cannot be easily changed. That would require reallocating the DSP resources of the whole synth engine to free up some instructions to add to the 2nd osc. So it will not be changed.

Don't shoot the messenger - I'm just reporting what I learned to help answer your inquiries.

Regards,

Jerry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slammah2012
Senior Member


Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 374
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your response....I am understanding from what you are saying that no corrections to the oscillator / tone generators can be updated due to lack of headroom in DSP resources....
Quote:
That would require reallocating the DSP resources of the whole synth engine to free up some instructions to add to the 2nd osc

Does that mean there would be no way to allow a (x10) to pitch down the secondary oscillator into <sub>oscillator frequencies which would benefit the ring modulator section???...like on a CS80....where the frequency range of the RM modulator goes from 1 Hz to 2KHz...???

Would this also mean there would be no way to acces a secondary user"pcm" bank on OSC 1 via USB memory sticks, and , does the timbre memory allocation top out at 16x16x4 (A1-P16..4 timbres) or could there be expansion to allow for patch-sets or timbres via USB memory???

Is the modulation section hindered by the DSP s lack of resources???

It would be nice to have lfo speed as a destination to envelopes or aftertouch........

By the Way......
"Thanks for your great messenger service".
_________________
Time Can be Mastered,
"NOW" is the Password....
Currently running, Hammond M3, Yamaha CS80 + MM6, Roland JX-3P + Mkb 1000 + Vk7 + D110, Alesis Quadrasynth plus, Haken Continuum fingerboard, Korg Radias + Lambda, Ensoniq SQ80, Waldorf Blofeld, Creamware Prodyssey + B4000, Use Audio Plugiator, Arp Axxe ....and some soft synths.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Unknown Sound
Full Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 129
Location: On a small island just off the coast of an island not to far from Antarctica

PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jerrythek wrote:
I checked into this with the developers and this is not a bug, or to be more correct, it is not unintentional. It has to do with the amount of DSP power allocated to the second oscillator, so it cannot be easily changed. That would require reallocating the DSP resources of the whole synth engine to free up some instructions to add to the 2nd osc. So it will not be changed.

Don't shoot the messenger - I'm just reporting what I learned to help answer your inquiries.

Regards,

Jerry


Thank you Jerry. At least I'm happy there has been an 'official' response.

So it appears the resource allocation within the RADIAS is reasonably fixed with only certain functions 'stealing' CPU time when enabled, in essence a deterministic allocation model.

Oh well, at least the RADIAS doesn't suffer the same problems the Virus TI does with voice dropouts and spurious pop & clicks when resources are low.--> '...80 voices under average conditions...'...yeah right! Very non-deterministic for a lot of TI owners.

A solid SINE for OSC2 would have been nice for the RADIAS but I'll live with it. hmmmm RADIAS Plus?? RADIAS Extreme?? I wonder if the EXB-RADIAS board for the M3 will have the same limitation...time will tell....oh God I'm rambling now, time to go.

Thanks again,

-US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jerrythek
Platinum Member


Joined: 28 Jan 2002
Posts: 2931

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi slammah:

Where is the USB master port on the RADIAS to support USB media devices? That is called a USB A port and the RADIAS doesn't have one... the MIDI transmission port is a USB B port.

So... the answer to those USB-related questions would be no.

Adding more modulation destinations etc. is cool, and I have seen others request a variety of programming enhancements like that. I'm not really sure of the answer to that, and as always, I can't give definitive comments about these types of things. But I do make sure the developers see/read these types of threads. We always learn about your wants and needs from them.

Thanks,

Jerry

slammah2012 wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your response....I am understanding from what you are saying that no corrections to the oscillator / tone generators can be updated due to lack of headroom in DSP resources....
Quote:
That would require reallocating the DSP resources of the whole synth engine to free up some instructions to add to the 2nd osc

Does that mean there would be no way to allow a (x10) to pitch down the secondary oscillator into <sub>oscillator frequencies which would benefit the ring modulator section???...like on a CS80....where the frequency range of the RM modulator goes from 1 Hz to 2KHz...???

Would this also mean there would be no way to acces a secondary user"pcm" bank on OSC 1 via USB memory sticks, and , does the timbre memory allocation top out at 16x16x4 (A1-P16..4 timbres) or could there be expansion to allow for patch-sets or timbres via USB memory???

Is the modulation section hindered by the DSP s lack of resources???

It would be nice to have lfo speed as a destination to envelopes or aftertouch........

By the Way......
"Thanks for your great messenger service".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gdh
Senior Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 288
Location: NW Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope that with the M3 this is fixed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg RADIAS / R3 All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group