Thanks for any info.
Proton

www.kidnepro.com
Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever
If by the above method you mean using a USB CD/DVD drive the answer is yes. What confuses a lot of people is that SCSI often gets used in discussions or descriptions of AKAI CD ROMS. This is because all of the early samplers and sampling keyboards used SCSI. At the time, it was the only portable 'mass storage'" standard. The fact that you need a SCSI drive to get these samples into an AKAI or Kurzweil is because that is the only interface available on these machines. If the modern instrument you are working with will read AKAI format CD-ROMS (as the M3 will) anything that will play a CD-ROM and can connect via a USB port will work fine.The Magic Hoof wrote:I've got a question about using Akai CD Roms.
When I tried using an Akai sample CD, I extracted everything with CD Xtract but it was quite a mess on my hard drive. There are multisamples and each individual wav file was basically random. I also loaded it into Kontakt but it seems that the samples are kind of random there as well and it's just hard to tell where you're at and what's what.
If I do the above method, would it be better-formatted and less confusing?
When dealing with S1000 / S3000 CD's I recommend converting first to soundfont as mentioned before. Soundfont retains the individual samples wav files in its container format (example: Name_of_file.sf2). That way the patch and the files are contained in a single file, which is easy to manage. Most software samplers recognize .SF2 out of the gate, and the M3 also supports .SF2 files as well. The only downside is you can't easily edit the individual sampled wav files contained in the .SF2 soundfont patches.The Magic Hoof wrote:I've got a question about using Akai CD Roms.
When I tried using an Akai sample CD, I extracted everything with CD Xtract but it was quite a mess on my hard drive. There are multisamples and each individual wav file was basically random. I also loaded it into Kontakt but it seems that the samples are kind of random there as well and it's just hard to tell where you're at and what's what.
If I do the above method, would it be better-formatted and less confusing?