Korg Forums Forum Index Korg Forums
A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world.
Moderated Independently.
Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kronos release - stunning move from Korg
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg Kronos
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kevin Nolan
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 2524
Location: Dublin, Ireland

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:21 am    Post subject: Kronos release - stunning move from Korg Reply with quote

I posted this in the old thread but felt the urge to post it here - I have to say that this is an absolutely incredible release by Korg. As an OASYS owner, I am incredibly excited. This release totally vindicates the vision and efforts of Korg in OASYS, and vindicates our belief and investment in it.

To anyone who doesn't own an OASYS - believe the hype! Kronos is the OASYS II, make no bones about it. It is everything the OASYS is, and then some.

Korg have simultaneously done the following in releasing Kronos:

- They've redefined the workstation. Previously a jack of all trades, now you have the real deal - among the best synthesizer engines and now sample libraries under the hood. But - THE most important thing of all that makes this leave even NI Komplete standing is - no or virtually no latency! You have all of this, live, on a keyboard. The workstation is a real and viable entity again, but vitally, instantaneous in production and live environments alike. Stunning.

- Now that all of OASYS’s stunning engines such as MOD-7, AL-1 and STR-1 are available to the masses, they will receive a massive injection of newly programmed sounds from 3rd parties. Finally, these awesome engines will get to reveal their awesome potential, barely realised to date.

- Korg have just given Yamaha and Roland a hiding. A right trashing. There will essentially be no point to buying any workstation but the Kronos for the foreseeable future. With the synthesizer, sample library, pianos and karma now all integrated into DAW environments and delivering the real deal on stage; Yamaha and Roland have only two options – drop out of the workstation market totally, or respond with similar capabilities. So watch this space for staggering developments in the next few years.

- Finally, for OASYS users, our investment in knowhow, methodologies and so on with OASYS have been given a huge new lease of life.


Overall I think this is a stunning move by Korg. They nailed their colours to the cross, the believed in the hardware synthesizer/workstation at a time when even most on this forum gave up on them, and they have made their incredible technologies available to virtually all musicians who want it badly enough, and they have put it right up to Yamaha and Roland - those two companies are, of their moment, in serious trouble regarding workstation sales. In fact, I’d even say that the CP-1, VPiano, Nord pianos and SV-1 are in serious trouble.

In one release, Korg have literally – and I mean literally – listend to and answered every gripe on the OASYS and M3 forums for the past three years. A stunning release and I’m incredibly excited by it. Again I’ll say to all non OASYS users to date – get the Kronos – it’s a massive improvement on the OASYS in all the ways that OASYS matters – yet the OASYS is still truly stunning – so just think what power you’ll have under your fingertips with Kronos. Get used to that name – you’re going to be seeing it on a lot of videos and live sets – it’s like DX7 or M1 all over again. Yamaha, Roland, Nord (Clavia) and Kurzweil must be quaking in their boots right now.

Kevin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
EvilDragon
Platinum Member


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 1992
Location: Croatia

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I, for one, am not afraid for Kurzweil. Smile


Kronos is a smart move, and a game changer in many ways. However Kurzweil is differently flavored, and will always find its way to the rightful owners. I love my PC3K8 and can't wait for their next move Smile


Till then, I'm saving up for Kronos 61 Wink



I just hope it has aftertouch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keego
Senior Member


Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 329
Location: Liverpool UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Evil Dragon. I love my my PC3 and will be saving for the Kronos 61. Kurzweil are working on a new workstation to replace the K series and I believe it will be a bit special.
That being said Kronos is gonna rule for the next few years Wink
_________________
Current Arsenal:
Kronos 61, Kurzweil PC3K6, Nord Stage 3, Yamaha MOXF8, Muse Receptor 2+, Mainstage


Previous:
Korg:X5D,Wavestation, N364, Trinity,Triton Classic,Triton Studio, Korg M3 61 w/ EXB-Radias
Ensoniq:TS12, SD1, ASR10
Roland:XP10, JD-800, Roland XV88, A90ex
Kurzweil:K2500RS, K2661, PC3
Nord: Electro 3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kevin Nolan
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 2524
Location: Dublin, Ireland

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. It appears that the voice count of Kronos is 75 - 80% that of OASYS. That's quite surprising. After all, OASYS is 6 years old yet it provides 20- 25% greater CPU power - a mark on how powerful OASYS has been and remains to be (in this regard). I would have thought it'd be quite cheap to increase on CPU capability given the 6 year gap in release date. That will have implications for projects composed on OASYS and imported into the Kronos sequencer (which I believe can be done) - you'll loose MIDI track voices on the Kronos if you had stretched OASYS close to its voice count limit (quite easily done with layered programs).

2. I'll stand corrected on this if incorrect, but from my reading of blurb to date it looks like the voice architecture within some of the traditional OASYS engines are a little simplified - less LFO's per voice for example (remember on OASYS it has polyphonic LFO's - many LFO's per voice and not per synth engine instance). In STR-1 with about 52 note polyphony and I think 5 LFO's per voice, when you call up an STR-1 program you're actually activating 52 x 5 LFO's (160 LFO's!). While most of the time you don't really care because the LFO's per voice react the same way, it does matter when, for example you add control of the LFO's to, say, note number or velocity. Then, each LFO for each voice can be controlled individually (an excellent feature).

Anyway, I suspect there are less LFO's and perhaps other features per voice in Kronos compared to OASYS voice architeture; which might have a bearing on their compatibility. But as said - I could be wrong on this.

Kevin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
realkuhl



Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 21
Location: http//:www.PlugInGuru.com

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The dual-processor handles things differently. There will be polyphony issues if you are playing huge chords with monster Combinations plus Drum Track. It's still very easy to make OASYS cough if you use unison patches and effects without thinking of the cost.

You can resample itself easily if necessary Very Happy

The engines parameters are the same, Kevin. Drum Track has been added but every patch sounds identical to how it sounded when we made them for OASYS.


Kevin Nolan wrote:
1. It appears that the voice count of Kronos is 75 - 80% that of OASYS. That's quite surprising. After all, OASYS is 6 years old yet it provides 20- 25% greater CPU power - a mark on how powerful OASYS has been and remains to be (in this regard). I would have thought it'd be quite cheap to increase on CPU capability given the 6 year gap in release date. That will have implications for projects composed on OASYS and imported into the Kronos sequencer (which I believe can be done) - you'll loose MIDI track voices on the Kronos if you had stretched OASYS close to its voice count limit (quite easily done with layered programs).

2. I'll stand corrected on this if incorrect, but from my reading of blurb to date it looks like the voice architecture within some of the traditional OASYS engines are a little simplified - less LFO's per voice for example (remember on OASYS it has polyphonic LFO's - many LFO's per voice and not per synth engine instance). In STR-1 with about 52 note polyphony and I think 5 LFO's per voice, when you call up an STR-1 program you're actually activating 52 x 5 LFO's (160 LFO's!). While most of the time you don't really care because the LFO's per voice react the same way, it does matter when, for example you add control of the LFO's to, say, note number or velocity. Then, each LFO for each voice can be controlled individually (an excellent feature).

Anyway, I suspect there are less LFO's and perhaps other features per voice in Kronos compared to OASYS voice architeture; which might have a bearing on their compatibility. But as said - I could be wrong on this.

Kevin

_________________
John "Skippy" Lehmkuhl
Composer, Engineer, Independent sound designer (Korg, Spectrasonics, Camel Audio, Native Instruments and many others)
Sound designer / Rhythm Monkey

Custom Sounds and Free Video Tutorials for
Virtual Instruments: www.pluginguru.com

My comments and opinions are not official statements from Korg Inc. I'm not official !!


Last edited by realkuhl on Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dany
Senior Member


Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 352

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kevin Nolan wrote:


Anyway, I suspect there are less LFO's and perhaps other features per voice in Kronos compared to OASYS voice architeture; which might have a bearing on their compatibility. But as said - I could be wrong on this.

Kevin


You can of course compare the specs for the OASYS and KRONOS on korg.com. For example:

KRONOS: AL1: Modulation:
Five Envelope generators, four per-voice LFOs, two AMS Mixers;
Per-voice Step Sequencer.

OASYS: AL1: Modulation:
Five Envelope generators, four per-voice LFOs, two Key Tracking generators, and two AMS Mixers; Per-voice Step Sequencer: 32-step sequencer with smoothing, adjustable step duration, and tempo synchronization.

KRONOS: STR1: Modulation:
5 Envelopes, 4 per-voice LFOs, 2 Key Track generators, String Tracking generators, 4 AMS Mixers.

OASYS: STR1: Modulation:
5 Envelopes, 4 per-voice LFOs, 2 Key Track generators, String Tracking generators, 4 AMS Mixers.

KRONOS:
SGX-1: 100 voices
EP-1: 104 voices
HD-1: 140 voices
AL-1: 80 voices
CX-3: 200 voices
STR-1: 40 voices
MOD-7: 52 voices
MS-20EX: 40 voices
PolysixEX: 180 voices

OASYS:
HD-1: 172 voices
AL-1: 96 voices
CX-3: 172 voices
STR-1: 48 voices
MS-20EX: 48 voices
PolysixEX: 172 voices
MOD-7: 52 voices


Off Topic for Kevin: Didn't forget about Mars...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
realkuhl



Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 21
Location: http//:www.PlugInGuru.com

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AL1 is the same between the two.

[quote="Dany"]
Kevin Nolan wrote:


You can of course compare the specs for the OASYS and KRONOS on korg.com. For example:

KRONOS: AL1: Modulation:
Five Envelope generators, four per-voice LFOs, two AMS Mixers;
Per-voice Step Sequencer.

OASYS: AL1: Modulation:
Five Envelope generators, four per-voice LFOs, two Key Tracking generators, and two AMS Mixers; Per-voice Step Sequencer: 32-step sequencer with smoothing, adjustable step duration, and tempo synchronization.

Off Topic for Kevin: Didn't forget about Mars...

_________________
John "Skippy" Lehmkuhl
Composer, Engineer, Independent sound designer (Korg, Spectrasonics, Camel Audio, Native Instruments and many others)
Sound designer / Rhythm Monkey

Custom Sounds and Free Video Tutorials for
Virtual Instruments: www.pluginguru.com

My comments and opinions are not official statements from Korg Inc. I'm not official !!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dany
Senior Member


Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 352

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

realkuhl wrote:
AL1 is the same between the two.



Yes, that's what I've guessed as well.

I assume that all the Synth engines of the OASYS and KRONOS, resp. all their program parameters are exactly identical.

-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Synthoid
Platinum Member


Joined: 17 Mar 2003
Posts: 3300
Location: PA, USA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

keego wrote:
Kurzweil are working on a new workstation to replace the K series and I believe it will be a bit special.


Hmmm, I hope more than a bit. We've been hearing rumors of the "K3000" for almost 5 years now. Hopefully Kurzweil is working on something truly phenomenal--with a LARGER screen please!
_________________
M3, Triton Classic, Radias, Motif XS, Alesis Ion
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
synthguy
Platinum Member


Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 661

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm in full agreement with Kevin. While some poo-poohed the OASYS, and then anything new workstation-wise from KORG, this is a serious new entry in the synth market. An OASYS that (most) keyboard players can afford. Nine distinct synthesizers and a rack of nice effects, with 16 track recording in one instrument. This really does change the game for everyone.

keego wrote:
I agree with Evil Dragon. I love my my PC3 and will be saving for the Kronos 61. Kurzweil are working on a new workstation to replace the K series and I believe it will be a bit special.
That being said Kronos is gonna rule for the next few years Wink

I agree with this too. While Kronos is going to make the PC3 "that other neat synth" when it comes out, VAST really is too cool, the PC3 does sound just awesome in its own right, and it is going to be a little cheaper. Though I must say that Kurzweil's R&D guys are going to have to keep their pencils pretty sharp. And as Synthoid says, a bigger screen please, and an integrated - not plug in - big ribbon. Wink

realkuhl wrote:
You are all going to love this instrument.

That's all I need to know. Of course, I did already, but it's always cool to get confirmation from someone inside. Wink
_________________
PRAY FOR THIS PLANET!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
thekeymaster
Senior Member


Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 367
Location: Stoke-On-Trent,England

PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KRONOS:
SGX-1: 100 voices
EP-1: 104 voices
HD-1: 140 voices
AL-1: 80 voices
CX-3: 200 voices
STR-1: 40 voices
MOD-7: 52 voices
MS-20EX: 40 voices
PolysixEX: 180 voices

OASYS:
HD-1: 172 voices
AL-1: 96 voices
CX-3: 172 voices
STR-1: 48 voices
MS-20EX: 48 voices
PolysixEX: 172 voices
MOD-7: 52 voices


Curious as to why some engines offer less and other's offer more.Is there a technical reason for this? I would have thought HD-1 should have been the same? It will get used the most after the piano engine me thinks.

This says to me that the KRONOS has more power than the O but its just been allocated differently. Patch switching for a start between all modes up's it's processing ability I would assume?
_________________
Neil.

Cake Muncher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
robinkle
Senior Member


Joined: 14 Jan 2011
Posts: 382
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvilDragon wrote:
I, for one, am not afraid for Kurzweil. Smile


Kronos is a smart move, and a game changer in many ways. However Kurzweil is differently flavored, and will always find its way to the rightful owners. I love my PC3K8 and can't wait for their next move Smile


Till then, I'm saving up for Kronos 61 Wink



I just hope it has aftertouch.


According to this video, the 88 key and 73 key versions has the same
keys as the SV-1. The SV-1 does not have aftertouch, atleast I didn't find it on the specs list. I don't know if it means that it can have aftertouch after all or not. But I hope it do have aftertouch, it's a pricey piece of gear!

http://www.sonicstate.com/news/2011/01/15/wnamm11-korgs-mighty-kronos/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvilDragon
Platinum Member


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 1992
Location: Croatia

PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M3 88 also has RH3 and has aftertouch. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robinkle
Senior Member


Joined: 14 Jan 2011
Posts: 382
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvilDragon wrote:
M3 88 also has RH3 and has aftertouch. Wink

Do we need the manual to find that? I can't find it on in the specs on korg website.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvilDragon
Platinum Member


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 1992
Location: Croatia

PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It has aftertouch, you can see it in MIDI implementation chart in the manual.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg Kronos All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group