Korg Forums Forum Index Korg Forums
A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world.
Moderated Independently.
Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Wow I think this person may have voided their warranty
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg Kronos
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RC-IA
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 971
Location: FR

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ANYWAY, there were absolutely no latency issue with Oasys, and i have no latency issue with kronos so far. (unless my ears need 8ms to send the sound to my brain) !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shap
Full Member


Joined: 09 Apr 2011
Posts: 194
Location: US northwest

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RC-IA wrote:
...unless my ears need 8ms to send the sound to my brain !


Assuming you're less than 45 feet tall, that seems unlikely. But the amount of time you need to process the signal in your brain depends a lot on the user..
_________________
Motif XF8, Kronos-88 (ordered), V-Synth GT, DT-Extreme eDrums
PC Core i7-920/24GB/3TB (2x)
Motu 2408mk3 + 24I/O
Sonar Producer, everything EastWest
Brian Moore iGuitar+Roland GI-20, Composite Acoustics 6, 12 string guitars, Multiple Ovations from when they were still worth it
Presonus Eureka (2x), TC Helicon VoiceOne
ADAM A7's and JBL 4328Ps, each for its purpose
Border Collies + Misc. Squeaky Toys
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thoraldus
Platinum Member


Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Posts: 2061
Location: Rocky Mountains - SE IDaho

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Speaking of latency, are there any pipe organists in this group? Wink
_________________
”It’s easy to play any musical instrument: all you have to do is touch the right key at the right time and the instrument will play itself.”

Johann Sebastian Bach

----------------------------------------------
Rick Stirling - Retired Electrical Engineer - Erstwhile Photographer
Korg Kronos2, Casio MZ-X500, PA600, AKAI MPD32, M-Audio Oxygen 25, ZOOM H6, Cakewalk Sonar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keyplayer14
Full Member


Joined: 20 May 2011
Posts: 160
Location: Exeter

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thoraldus wrote:
Speaking of latency, are there any pipe organists in this group? Wink


Well I studied it at Uni, don't get to play one often these days!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
michelkeijzers
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 9113
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

keyplayer14 wrote:
Thoraldus wrote:
Speaking of latency, are there any pipe organists in this group? Wink


Well I studied it at Uni, don't get to play one often these days!


I played normal organ and the lowest 'footmate' (sorry don't know the english term) is 16' which equals about 5 m. I don't know if 32' also exist (that would be 10m).

Since the sound is travelling up through the pipe and going down after reflection it takes at least 20 m.
Sound travels with about 300m/s so the latency is 67ms.

Note that for small pipes (2') the latency is only 4 ms and the 'normal' is 8' which results in 16 ms.
_________________

Developer of the free PCG file managing application for most Korg workstations: PCG Tools, see https://www.kronoshaven.com/pcgtools/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Thoraldus
Platinum Member


Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Posts: 2061
Location: Rocky Mountains - SE IDaho

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

michelkeijzers wrote:
keyplayer14 wrote:
Thoraldus wrote:
Speaking of latency, are there any pipe organists in this group? Wink


Well I studied it at Uni, don't get to play one often these days!


I played normal organ and the lowest 'footmate' (sorry don't know the english term) is 16' which equals about 5 m. I don't know if 32' also exist (that would be 10m).

Since the sound is travelling up through the pipe and going down after reflection it takes at least 20 m.
Sound travels with about 300m/s so the latency is 67ms.

Note that for small pipes (2') the latency is only 4 ms and the 'normal' is 8' which results in 16 ms.


Then you have to add the latency for the distance from the pipe to the performer's ear as well as the delays in the electro-magnetic keying system. Adding everything up the total latency can be a significant amount, so much so that you may be playing several notes ahead of what you are hearing. I had a friend come down to the Elks Lodge in Los Angeles when the great Robert Morton organ there was still in its prime. She was an accomplished pianist but could not get more than a few notes played before giving up. Wink
_________________
”It’s easy to play any musical instrument: all you have to do is touch the right key at the right time and the instrument will play itself.”

Johann Sebastian Bach

----------------------------------------------
Rick Stirling - Retired Electrical Engineer - Erstwhile Photographer
Korg Kronos2, Casio MZ-X500, PA600, AKAI MPD32, M-Audio Oxygen 25, ZOOM H6, Cakewalk Sonar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EXer
Platinum Member


Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Posts: 558
Location: France

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thoraldus wrote:
Then you have to add the latency for the distance from the pipe to the performer's ear as well as the delays in the electro-magnetic keying system

...without mentioning the latency of an organ equipped with a tubular-pneumatic traction Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keyplayer14
Full Member


Joined: 20 May 2011
Posts: 160
Location: Exeter

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

EXer wrote:
Thoraldus wrote:
Then you have to add the latency for the distance from the pipe to the performer's ear as well as the delays in the electro-magnetic keying system

...without mentioning the latency of an organ equipped with a tubular-pneumatic traction Wink


To all of which you can add the sometimes remote position of the console in vast resonant buildings....still, it's a tremendous feeling to play in some of those spaces though!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Broadwave
Platinum Member


Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 1118
Location: Manchester UK

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forgive me for bumping this thread again, but I'm surprised this chap didn't try loading another 2Gb RAM just to see if it works.

I'm starting to feel that the stock 2Gb isn't enough.
_________________
Synth DIY Projects
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
madbeatzyo111
Guest


Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 379

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvilDragon wrote:
...except D510 is definitely by far NOT the best low-power embedded system CPU that's out there. Wink


Other options? ARM? VIA? Both those are lower-power consumption chips, but I wonder if the performance would be good enough. AMD Fusion APU is optimized for graphics performance so I don't think it would be a good fit for the Kronos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvilDragon
Platinum Member


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 1992
Location: Croatia

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Intel has other Atom CPUs that are more powerful, D510 is not the best. That's all I'm saying.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
michelkeijzers
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 9113
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvilDragon wrote:
Intel has other Atom CPUs that are more powerful, D510 is not the best. That's all I'm saying.


If the D510 is good enough why not use it. Development of a synth takes years and changing a processor during the course of development might take quite some risk and time.
_________________

Developer of the free PCG file managing application for most Korg workstations: PCG Tools, see https://www.kronoshaven.com/pcgtools/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
madbeatzyo111
Guest


Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 379

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvilDragon wrote:
Intel has other Atom CPUs that are more powerful, D510 is not the best. That's all I'm saying.


http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=29035&MarketSegment=DT

True, they could have used the D525 (1.8Ghz vs 1.66Ghz clock speed). Looks like the same cost too, but it launched a quarter after the D510 so maybe the timing wasn't good to incorporate it into the Kronos.

I feel that Korg should have gone instead with a ULV core i3 as long they were planning to use a fan. This one in particular has only 5 watts more power consumption, but is a huge leap in performance and can accommodate up to 8Gb RAM. 'Course it would added $50-100 to the overall price too.
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=49021&processor=i3-330UM&spec-codes=SLBUG

Maybe they could have made different versions of the Kronos--the low performance Atom and the high performance Core at different price points.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Randelph
Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 604
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

madbeatzyo111 wrote:

Maybe they could have made different versions of the Kronos--the low performance Atom and the high performance Core at different price points.


Hopefully that will be AFTER they create an SV-II version of the Kronos that has the piano/organ/ep/HD-1 engines, with weighted 76 note action (C-E), joystick and ribbon on the top panel, weighing under 30 pounds!!!

Randy
_________________
Keyboards: Kawai ES920 / Casio CT-X5000
Instruments: Keys / Alto Recorder and Melodica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
madbeatzyo111
Guest


Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 379

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Randelph wrote:
madbeatzyo111 wrote:

Maybe they could have made different versions of the Kronos--the low performance Atom and the high performance Core at different price points.


Hopefully that will be AFTER they create an SV-II version of the Kronos that has the piano/organ/ep/HD-1 engines, with weighted 76 note action (C-E), joystick and ribbon on the top panel, weighing under 30 pounds!!!

Randy


I think it's a natural progression, I'm certain the next flagship workstation from the big 3 will have a better CPU (using a low-power 22nm process) than the Atom that can accommodate loads of additional RAM.

...BTW you forgot about physical pads!!! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg Kronos All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group