|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cdog
Joined: 05 Jul 2011 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:14 am Post subject: MPC 1000 + Keyboard vs Microsampler |
|
|
Hey Im considering how much of the functionality of the Korg microsampler I could get by pairing an MPC1000 with a midi keyboard controller. Is it possible to record samples so they are immediately spread across the keyboard?
I know the MPC is a lot more powerful so what does the microsampler do that the MPC+keyboard doesnt do? Im looking at $700 for a used keyboard and MPC vs like $300 for a mint microsampler (which I noticed doesnt have a swing function, which concerns me).
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tonidude
Joined: 08 Oct 2011 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:11 pm Post subject: Re: MPC 1000 + Keyboard vs Microsampler |
|
|
cdog wrote: | Hey Im considering how much of the functionality of the Korg microsampler I could get by pairing an MPC1000 with a midi keyboard controller. Is it possible to record samples so they are immediately spread across the keyboard?
I know the MPC is a lot more powerful so what does the microsampler do that the MPC+keyboard doesnt do? Im looking at $700 for a used keyboard and MPC vs like $300 for a mint microsampler (which I noticed doesnt have a swing function, which concerns me).
Thanks |
Well, the interface is really different. I think the MS really wins on that front.
Also, MPC is not meant for melodic ("gate") samples. I don't think you can take a sample and spread it among multiple keys, it doesn't know how to transpose a sample? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
korakios Junior Member
Joined: 23 Nov 2010 Posts: 59 Location: GREECE
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
MPC vs microsampler?The are completely different samplers.
If you don't have another sampler and don't work on a computer I would definitely choose an mpc because you can't write a complete song with microsampler due to limited ram per bank (only 160 seconds of recording time for monaural samples at a 48 kHz-not upgradeable).
But If you plan to have a sampler for adding parts and fx on loops and you are using mainly software I'd choose the MS(straight forward interface).It depends on how you make music.
PS. Mpc500 (and I assume the mpc1000) can chromatically pitch a sample. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Telengard Full Member
Joined: 07 Aug 2011 Posts: 237
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
korakios wrote: | If you don't have another sampler and don't work on a computer I would definitely choose an mpc because you can't write a complete song with microsampler due to limited ram per bank (only 160 seconds of recording time for monaural samples at a 48 kHz-not upgradeable). |
That all depends on how you make songs. If you just sample entire existing songs and chop them up, then yeah, the RAM is a bit limited. But if you create songs from scratch using smaller samples then there is more then enough. I have a few songs already created on one bank and there is room for a lot more with out having to reuse existing samples. _________________ Korg Gear: Electribe 2, microSAMPLER, Mini Kaoss Pad 2, monotron, nanoKey, nanoKontrol2, nanoPad2
Korg Apps: iMS-20, iElectribe, iKaossilator
Old Korg Gear: Electribe EMX-1SD, monotribe (with MIDI), Kaossilator Pro, KP3, SOS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
korakios Junior Member
Joined: 23 Nov 2010 Posts: 59 Location: GREECE
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Telengard wrote: |
That all depends on how you make songs. If you just sample entire existing songs and chop them up, then yeah, the RAM is a bit limited. But if you create songs from scratch using smaller samples then there is more then enough. I have a few songs already created on one bank and there is room for a lot more with out having to reuse existing samples. |
I totally agree.I assume you use the sequencer often, which I never do.I always resample with effects/chop/resample and so on...that is why I find the RAM limited but it's a damn fast sampler... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|