 |
Korg Forums
A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world.
Moderated Independently.
Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Wich one is Better |
| Korg R3 |
|
100% |
[ 6 ] |
| MicroKORG |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
mrsonic996
Joined: 14 May 2012
Posts: 31
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:12 pm Post subject: Can the R3 Replicate the MK XL, And is it better? |
 |
|
I really want to know. Could the R3 Do the same sounds as the XL Can?
Would an R3 be more worth it?
And how well is the Interface on the R3. Is it as easy to create and modify Synths on the R3 as it was on the original MicroKORG? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
X-Trade
Moderator
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 5977
Location: Reading, UK
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The interface is bett on the R3. The effects section is better on the R3 too. It has a few other things that the XL lacks too.
But if you're looking for a rubbish mono piano smoke and a bunch if other cheap gimmicks like the battery powered portability, by all means go for the XL. The R3 doesn't have those, but it is reasonably sized.
The actual sound generation algorithms are the same.
_________________
Current Gear: Kronos 61, Karma, RADIAS-R, ESX-1, microKorg, MS2000B, MiniKP, AX3000B, nanoKontrol, nanoPad MK II, Novation ReMote37SL, Akai APC20, MOTU MIDI TimePiece 2.
Past Gear: Korg TR61, Poly800, EA-1, Kawai K1
Software: Cubase Studio 4, NI Reaktor 5, FM8, Ableton Live 9. Apple OSX(10.8.3 Mountain Lion) on 15" MacBook Pro |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
