Korg Forums

That's actually incorrect No, that's actually correct! I have owned an ER-1, EA-1 and an ES-1, so I know for a fact that trying to get the right pitch in the context quoted in the previous post is in fact trial and error! That's 127 steps but I cannot work out how to land on exact notes with that ...

I suspect, at least with the ES, that Korg assumed people would be using it as a sampling drum machine where such accurate pitching wouldn't be of paramount importance. Baffling as to why they'd continue to use that in the 2 though. I dunno

Thank you. Yes, I came across that youtube video and posted on it but that was after I had posted here. I was about to do a similar test with a sine wave and analyze each increment value. Cheers

Haha! Trial and error mate! That's actually incorrect because the increment value doesn't allow for such a varied scope of semitone & cent tuning. It's either +63 or -64 so not including zero, that's a finite value of 127 steps, there's no possible way to fall on an exact minor 3rd, major 3rd or ...

The closest you'll get is either copying the same sound to different parts at different pitches, or motion sequencing pitch on a given part. Hi. I'm new to the es1mk2, in regard to the motion sequencing of pitch, the manual states -64/+63 for the lowest & highest value but any idea how that relates ...