Korg Forums

ErnestoD wrote: two days ago my wife surprised me with a new M3-88, she told me to pick up a guitar amp for a friend of us....

greetz from a happy person,

Ernesto

Where can I get your wife?

Does it matter when it sounds better lol...

Other bands make changes like that al the time.

Yeah, but its not like many could tell the difference if he just replaced the strings with "stereo strings" or something from TR. Or if he sampled something better from the oasys. Strange that he went to lenghts by buying 3 keyboards and sampling, exspecially since like you said 80% of the stuff is ...

Ok... That is so strange.

I dont even get why he samples the big strings patch and doesnt just use the TR.

But I def dont get why he uses 3 TR's,,, when one would be easily enough. And why TR... out of all the synths. And he has an oasys in the studio WHY?

Well some things I will never get...

Ok,

But how hes going to play big strings patch on TR which doesnt have it...=?


And why does he use TR... That seems to be the worst unit from korg to get pretty much, and why 3 of them?

/ OFFTOPIC

Tr?

I dont see a TR there?

But yeah I see what you mean, though there is no orchestra in celesty...

The orchestra sounds really korgish, unrealistically high boosted.

Hey, evildragon... You own a X5d right? I am trying to make the famous orchestral hit and "violin solo hit sound" - by nightwish, are these some presets from X5d. I cant find anything like these from the X50.... I also like the horn "crescendo", but I guess thats doable. http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

Well still, it is pretty easy to "approximate" which sounds better. And I am asking opinions on which sound better anyway. To me, PC3 sounds much better, no question about it. Yeah, I am going to go with it... I would probably take the korg though if I didnt have the X50, they are quiet similar ...

The problem with 'better sound' is that there is no universal 'better' sound. All flagship workstations sound 'good' overall. What is better for me is not necessarily better for you, and the other way around. If you are not interested in a workstation, don't get M3. If you main concern is sound ...

The primary thing for me is the sound... I dont really need anything else than the perfect sound =). There no such thing as perfect sound. Seems like you don't want a synthesizer workstation, if you want perfect sound. Even the real piano is not 'perfect sound'. What I meant was I want the better ...

After using the Triton Extreme, and K2600 , I decide to work with Fantom-X. I had to change it (financial trouble). After a short time, I find a M3 on a price that was very good for me (1000 euro) and took it. what can I say? As sounds? A General Midi with "class". The 3 sounds that makes M3 ...

The votes are still pretty good on the M3...

It does sound like the string sounds are improved a lot in the latest korg models....

Could someone post me a quick sample of the M3 strings?

Is there something like in the oasys aka.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhO_4ANCuRU

I havent had a chance to test either of these boards, due to living in the middle of nowhere... :evil: I would suggest making a trip to test both out, even if it costs some money to do so. Kurzweil, Korg, Yamaha, and Roland all make products that have some good sounds in them. I used to own a ...

Uhm, by perfect sound I dont mean it has to be ultra high resolution.

I mean it has to sound good.... The sounds must sound good, be playable and the synth has also have nice character and FX section....