Trommis wrote:One of the Korg-dealers here in Norway told me that one of the reasons for the OASYS to "die", was that one of the circuit-boards was no longer available to Korg. Sounds weird to me....... Not a good statement for the future maintainence of "the big O" if this is correct!
Does anybody here know i this is true or just bull####?
Hi Trommis.
Some people have quoted that same theory over here months ago to explain why it is not going to be manufactured anymore, and if you ask me, it makes sense to me.
Its perfeclty possible that it may be hard to get high volumes of some of the OASYS parts, as these are computer based parts with an average time of more than 6 years in the regular computer market, or even more. We al know how fast pieces get ancient in the computer world, and that is so much time for regular PC components.
But regarding the reasons for the OASYS pltatform to "die", it has nothing to do with it, IMHO, or it would have to be, at least.
The hadware may be discontinued; ok, we all can understand the reasons and must assume it. But it doesnt have to be this way to the development of the plattform and the OS updates of the system.
This hardware is still capable of so much more, even when this system is designed to be upgraded by adding code to it. The same can be said to keep some kind of development for the entire OASYS series in the future.
And lets face it, as it stands, the OASYS as a workstation tool is few steps below than what its actually out there in the market.
And thats not an oppinion, it is fact.
I was in my local dealer the other day, I was digging the Fantom G capabilities in the sequencer area, specially its editing features, and I was seeing as well the great DAW integration the Motif XS has, and its remote control of Cubase.
I think is fair to say Korg is aware of all this, if not they woudnt gave the M3 an update to improve its sequencer, even when it has a very good DAW integration fuctionality, that the OASYS lacks.
The OASYS, therefore, even if it was going to be discontinued, needed as well some kind of sequencer update, just to stand the market standard nowdays, even comparing what Korg did with their other WS, which needed the internal sequencer less than its big brother thanks to its DAW possiblities.
And I think its not fair to read comments like the one Stephen Kay did not long ago, that some of us would like to see Korg broke in order get our Sequencer update released. Please Stephen, not that, and not from you.
First, IMHO no one here would like to see Korg broke under any circumstance, and second, I dont think for a sigle moment that Korg would be on backrupt if they devoted some time to develop the OASYS sequencer, as they were not in bankrupt when they had time to enhanced the M3 sequencer as they did.
Regards.
D.