My Kronos impressions

Discussion relating to the Korg Kronos Workstation.

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever

EvilDragon
Platinum Member
Posts: 1992
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:18 pm
Location: Croatia

Post by EvilDragon »

madbeatzyo111 wrote:
EvilDragon wrote: (when you subtract the brute-forced 9 GB they used for pianos (which proves they cannot really make a nice and optimized sample set, in fact)...
I've read and seen a lot of reviews on the Kronos, but this is the first time I've seen criticism of Korg for putting the best piano sound on the market into their keyboard ;) I suppose you would prefer instead a highly compressed sample set that uses pychoacoustic trickery to make it sound real?
It's not a criticism. It's a fact. It's much easier to make a big sample set than a smaller one. Hence, they brute-forced it. That doesn't mean that it sounds bad, it does not, it sounds pretty darn good. But they brute-forced it.

However, it still doesn't compare to a certain modelled piano software latest beta version that I have running over here ;)
User avatar
EXer
Platinum Member
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:35 pm
Location: France

Post by EXer »

CfNorENa wrote:I'd consider the PC3X, given how inexpensive it is, but I wonder if I could survive with that UI and sequencer...
I don't know if you need a new keyboard right now or if you can wait a year or so. I would say "let's wait and see".

According to David Weiser, Kurz are cooking something new, although he didn't say what nor when...

Korg say the Kronos has changed the game; that's not untrue: if Yamaha want to keep the supremacy they currently have on the synth workstation market with their Motif line, they have to release a *multi-synthesis* synth workstation too, and I believe they will.

As to the Kronos, it's a good product, but there is still room for improvement, as has been said on this forum.
User avatar
EXer
Platinum Member
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:35 pm
Location: France

Post by EXer »

EvilDragon wrote: (when you subtract the brute-forced 9 GB they used for pianos (which proves they cannot really make a nice and optimized sample set, in fact)...
That's clueless.

You're missing the fact that "optimal" has a meaning in a specified context only, i.e. achieving the best result given the constraints that exist in that context.

Reducing, compressing and compromising the samples to make them fit in limited ROM is no more a technical constraint. In the context of a 30 GB SSD from which the samples can be streamed, a 9 GB piano sample set can be considered as optimal.
Megakazbek
Junior Member
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:58 am

Post by Megakazbek »

EvilDragon wrote:It's not a criticism. It's a fact. It's much easier to make a big sample set than a smaller one. Hence, they brute-forced it. That doesn't mean that it sounds bad, it does not, it sounds pretty darn good. But they brute-forced it.
Well, they did less work and achieved better result, so by any measure they performed (regarding the pianos) better than anyone who had to spend time on optimizing their samples for smaller size.
User avatar
EXer
Platinum Member
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:35 pm
Location: France

Post by EXer »

burningbusch wrote:[...]All played in realtime.

Kronos Strings

Busch.
You're a good player.

But I'm not fully convinced by these strings: would they sound as good without the cello, which is (imo) the main contributor to the sound quality of your arrangement?
User avatar
jimknopf
Platinum Member
Posts: 3374
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 1:52 pm

Post by jimknopf »

I certainly like some Kronos strings better than the Kurzweils, and I don't see at all what should be "missing", but that is not my main point.

What makes me react to several threads here recently, have been critical remarks about the Kronos which I just can't share (there are some others I DO share, but they are minor so far). There is so much obvious malevolent, hardly comprehensible buzz in some threads and remarks that it provokes clear cut answers.

I have been working my way into my Kronos 73 since 2 weeks now, and for my purposes experienced something I NEVER experienced before with any workstation or multi-purpose synth: wherever I want to go, I can go with this instrument, and nearly always get quite exactly what I want so far.

I got my own programming of my favorite Rhodes and Wurly patches together within a week or so. I got Pianos exactly to my liking for various purposes. I get strings and pads just as I want them. I have only just begun with programming the VAs, but already noticed that I can get surprisingly close to my old Polysix patches with the Kronos VA, or get a dry Arp synth bass sound I know well without big problems from AL-1. I try to make a Brian Auger B3 patch (something rather uncommon, without Leslie) and get there in no time with the CX3 (I failed to come close with my earlier B3 clones or sample sounds). I search for effects and find VERY good ones, with some reverb in a quality I never met on synths or workstations, and stomp boxes which show a stunning similarity with the hardware equivalents I have right here. Etc etc. This all has been an extremely positive experience for me, and I'm only just beginning to make full use of this keyboard.

Coming from this experience, it is completely beyond me how some people in here make completely immature remarks about things they obviously haven't even begun to check out or understand in any convincing way. It's something else if someone says: well, I haven't been successful in finding this or that to my liking in my first attemt in the store. But it's strange drawing far reaching conclusions and making general statements from superficial impressions, or exaggerate big time concerning knobs, sliders and screen proportions and build qualty in general. There's just much too much obvious will to harm the overall impression of a new workstation without any real competition in the present market going on, to be credible at all in this crazy form.
jerrythek
Platinum Member
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 11:06 pm

Post by jerrythek »

EvilDragon wrote:Let me chime in with my first time experiences, too.

Oh, there's one more thing I must comment on. I absolutely dislike the drum tracks feature, it should be turned off globally by default. I know I'm probably alone in this, but like I said once above, I don't care. :lol: There's one more thing I didn't like - even when I disabled drum tracks in Global, THE DRUMKIT PARTS WERE STILL TURNED ON IN COMBIS! Which means that I played whatever the combi it was, overlaid with those drums! Which is what I did NOT want to happen! If I turn off the drum tracks, could you be so kind to mute the drum parts of all the combis, too? Sheesh. That one irritated me right there, on the spot. Just thought I'd mention it. If there's a way to make it go away, I'm all ears. If not, my only solution would be wiping all combi banks clean before using the product seriously. At least in my case.
Drums can be played by KARMA as well... if you didn't like drum grooves I wonder why you would have still liked bass lines/comping and other phrases playing... But anyway, there are very valid reasons for KARMA generating drum grooves at times, since it can be so much more flexible/varying/creative. Anway - you seem like a strong player, so I'd assume you'd want all auto-generating stuff turned off. So turn off KARMA until you want it.

Jerry
EvilDragon
Platinum Member
Posts: 1992
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:18 pm
Location: Croatia

Post by EvilDragon »

Thanks for the info, Jerry. Will do so next time I'm off to check out Kronos.
User avatar
madbeatzyo111
Guest
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 5:45 pm

Post by madbeatzyo111 »

EvilDragon wrote:
It's not a criticism. It's a fact. It's much easier to make a big sample set than a smaller one. Hence, they brute-forced it. That doesn't mean that it sounds bad, it does not, it sounds pretty darn good. But they brute-forced it.
Using uncompressed samples may be considered brute-forcing it. Then again, using a powerful CPU and complex algorithms may also be considered brute force. In the end both are still better than using a small sample set and psychoacoustic compensation. There was a valid technical limitation 20 years ago that prompted the need for it, but things have moved on since then. I hope Kurz understand this for their next keyboard. Really, only Yamaha has the luxury of doing the same old things the same old way but just slightly better each time.
User avatar
synthguy
Platinum Member
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:24 am

Post by synthguy »

jimknopf wrote:I have been working my way into my Kronos 73 since 2 weeks now, and for my purposes experienced something I NEVER experienced before with any workstation or multi-purpose synth: wherever I want to go, I can go with this instrument, and nearly always get quite exactly what I want so far.

(*gush gush gush* Heck, read the whole thing, good post)
This is my anticipation, having no experience with the Kronos outside of some audio demos I downloaded, and some YouTube vids. But just seeing the Motif fan squishing inside because he had to admit the Kronos is a very different kind of keyboard speaks volumes. It makes me consider selling everything and getting a Kronos to use as my sole instrument for music making. Of course, then I come to my senses. :wink:

I know that everyone's experience is very personal and individual. But as a longtime M3 owner who's owned the Kurzweil PC3 for a few months now, I chucked the PC3 into the bedroom and focused on the M3. Why? (Edit: Kurz owners, take with a grain of salt and see further post below)

Dealing with the PC3 is a neverending fight. The UI makes sense for the most part, but the way the synth engine is structured has unexpected pitfalls that are frankly brain dead. Doing modulation routing is sometimes easy peasy, sometimes NOTHING works until you find a friendly ear at the Sonikmatters forums who doesn't smart off quickly with "RTFM!" Which the manual sucks, by the way. Much crucial information can only be found on Kurz legacy manuals. Audio quality is outstanding. Patches are a mixed bag, which on any other instrument I've owned has been a blessing. Not on the minefield-laden PC3. Rolling my own patches has been a migrane. The much simpler, less powerful K2000R I own has been way more fun to program patches on. With the PC3, my last patch took THREE DAYS to get where I wanted with it. On my M3, programming patches FROM SCRATCH takes a couple of hours or so. I had to get away from the Kurz because I was beginning to hate the thing. And then, lo and behold, the patch I was fighting to get on the PC3 was on a Kronos YouTube video preset. And if that wasn't bad enough, my ribbon controller was defective, and the keyboard response is very bad, making it almost impossible to play velocity values much over 100 on the 127-step MIDI scale. I can't find a combo of type and velocity curve that works. Plus, many samples on the PC3 rom are extremely compressed, like the pianos, making the whole instrument sound compressed.

Gah... :?

The M3 sounds and FEELS very good in comparison. I don't care for the reverb, but everything else is stellar. Just about EVERYTHING is easy peasy on the M. I want a sound, and with much less work and time, I have it. It's much more limiting than the PC3, but, good Lord, who wants to have an argument with the thing every time I want to make a patch? I'm still keeping the PC3, for now, but it remains to be seen how much use it gets. I have faith in the Kurzweil team that they can make a proper successor to the K2600, but the PC3 isn't it.

I know people rave about the Kurzweil orchestral sounds, but I compared them to the M3's, and frankly, the raw samples don't sound any better to me. It seems to be all in the programming, but I'd add that I don't find the M3's orchestral sounds, when tweaked, to be lacking at all, just different. In fact, there are more orchestral sounds in the M3, especially with the sample pack expansion. And I have to say that neither one are as good in my not so humble opinion to the samples on Roland's SRX expansion boards.

The 9gb piano samples in the Kronos aren't just a "brute force" way to provide great sounding piano recreations. It's what everyone SHOULD be doing, until high polyphony good sounding fully modeled pianos become a reality. And right now, I don't have a proper music computer, so soft pianos aren't an option for me, or many others.

Needless to say from this lengthy rant, and other posts I've made, it's obvious that I'm jonesing badly for a Kronos. Nothing less will be as satisfying. I know the Next Kurz is lurking in the vapors of tomorrow, but who knows when it's going to be born? And I don't expect it to replace any of my gear, any more than the Kronos will. Except for that damned PC3. But I expect that the Kronos partnered with the PC3 will be an adequate combination to make the new K synth unnecessary. I say that now, but I'm still going through "buyer's dismay" with the PC3, and I'd much rather wait to see if they quit making Kurzweils designed by engineers FOR engineers. Geh. :P
Last edited by synthguy on Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
PRAY FOR THIS PLANET!!
EvilDragon
Platinum Member
Posts: 1992
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:18 pm
Location: Croatia

Post by EvilDragon »

synthguy wrote:I have faith in the Kurzweil team that they can make a proper successor to the K2600, but the PC3 isn't it.
PC3 was never supposed to be a successor to the K2600. Other than that, I respect your opinions.


Hey, if you decide to have a fight with that thing again, please hit me a PM, I'll gladly help you out if possible. :)
Chriskk
Senior Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 4:16 am

Post by Chriskk »

I was probably one of the first people that bought a K2000 almost 20 years ago. I still love it.
And I have to say that neither one are as good in my not so humble opinion to the samples on Roland's SRX expansion boards.
Orchestral sounds on the SRX boards are killer IMO, especially harpsichord sounds. I sold my trusty XV-3080 early this year but soon realized I couldn't do without the SRX boards. So, I bought a Juno Stage just for the boards. The JS surprisingly sounds much clearer than the XV and Fantom X.
User avatar
Synthoid
Platinum Member
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 12:54 am
Location: PA, USA

Post by Synthoid »

synthguy wrote:I'm still going through "buyer's dismay" with the PC3, and I'd much rather wait to see if they quit making Kurzweils designed by engineers FOR engineers. Geh. :P
I feel the same way about my K2661. After reading all the raves about the K2600 series several years ago (some fact and some BS), I found a K2661 on sale and bought it. I agree the manual is awful, the menu-diving is the pits, and that display screen is ancient.

Sure, there are people who swear by Kurzweil, but that's because they have spent hours and hours struggling with them. They aren't intuitive to most musicians at all. Yes, you see various "stars" using Kurzweil onstage, but I bet someone else programs them!

#-o
M3, Triton Classic, Radias, Motif XS, Alesis Ion
aron
Platinum Member
Posts: 1552
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:03 am
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Post by aron »

>I was probably one of the first people that bought a K2000 almost 20 years ago. I still love it.


Wow 20 years! You should have felt the prototype keyed on the k2000! I loved it! Then when the real one came out..... Not as good at all. In any case what a powerful synthesizer it was. I never had a crashed disk despite having a hard drive in there. And how bout that fan! :-)
Korg Kronos, RD-88, Yamaha VL1, Deep Mind 6, Korg Kross, author of unrealBook for iPad.
Chriskk
Senior Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 4:16 am

Post by Chriskk »

>I was probably one of the first people that bought a K2000 almost 20 years ago. I still love it.


Wow 20 years! You should have felt the prototype keyed on the k2000! I loved it! Then when the real one came out..... Not as good at all. In any case what a powerful synthesizer it was. I never had a crashed disk despite having a hard drive in there. And how bout that fan!
My father-in-law was a friend of a vice president of Young Chang at that time. I got one of the first production models through him. Some of the early units had a "Young Chang K2000" logo, not "Kurzweil K2000." I made it sure that I'd get a Kurzweil K2000, not a Young Chang K2000! The main manual was like an encyclopedia of all the substractive synthesis methods known to man. Reading it was as much fun as programming and playing the K2000!

The fan! The sampling option came with the fan. It's still quiet :-)
Post Reply

Return to “Korg Kronos”