Page 8 of 23

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:23 pm
by Daz
It would be less of a problem if we had 32 timbres of course :-)

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:26 pm
by vEddY
Daz wrote:It would be less of a problem if we had 32 timbres of course :-)
I agree :-) Maybe that's asking too much, huh? It would, however, be ... I can't really put that into words. Out of this world? :)

RX-Sound for OASYS

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:37 pm
by medusaland
RX Sound into Oasys...This would be fantastic!

new Sample Import options!

more Exi -libraries like FM,Prophecy,Z1,PS3000-3200

Re: RX-Sound for OASYS

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:41 pm
by vEddY
medusaland wrote:RX Sound into Oasys...This would be fantastic!

new Sample Import options!

more Exi -libraries like FM,Prophecy,Z1,PS3000-3200
Well, we could go on and on about this :) Physical, Granular modelling, FM, Trinity library, Z1, M1, X3, etc :) Loads of wishes :)

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:02 pm
by peter m. mahr
wishlist - x-mas 2oo6 addendum

- portamento for the polysix :-)

- improved sample management (format import, auto loop, etc)

- resynthesis

- ethno sample library (mid and far east, africa, celt, etc.)

- oberheim or sci exi (ob-xa, ob-8, matrix or p5)

- prophecy exi

- better vocoder (comparable to rolands v-synth xt)

- a sequencer doing justice to the OASYS

last but not least ...

more accuracy before releasing new OS (test routine for Betatesters ?!)


peter

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:16 am
by danatkorg
peter m. mahr wrote:- oberheim or sci exi (ob-xa, ob-8, matrix or p5)
Just a note - the AL-1 can do quite good oberheim and p5 sounds, with the exception of audio-rate polymod for the p5 filter. Look in the manual/help for the AL-1's OSC Basic page, under the heading "Modeling vintage analog synths," and the various sections to which it refers. I wasn't allowed to use actual synth names in the manual, but they are hinted at: "classic synthesizer expander module," "American, wood-paneled monophonic synthesizer," "famous five-voice American synthesizer."

- Dan

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:00 am
by Daz
LOL ... they're cute those references ... I like the reference to "a well known German Synth" in the Op Guide when discussing the idea of scanning through the steps in a wav seq.

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:14 am
by peter m. mahr
danatkorg wrote:
peter m. mahr wrote:- oberheim or sci exi (ob-xa, ob-8, matrix or p5)
Just a note - the AL-1 can do quite good oberheim and p5 sounds, with the exception of audio-rate polymod for the p5 filter. Look in the manual/help for the AL-1's OSC Basic page, under the heading "Modeling vintage analog synths," and the various sections to which it refers. I wasn't allowed to use actual synth names in the manual, but they are hinted at: "classic synthesizer expander module," "American, wood-paneled monophonic synthesizer," "famous five-voice American synthesizer."

- Dan
Dan,

you know that I programmed already some typical Oberheim and P5 sounds with the AL-1 ;-). But I did not know this part of the manual (guess it is in the parameter guide) which I will check for sure, thanks for the hint.
I like the reference to "a well known German Synth" in the Op Guide when discussing the idea of scanning through the steps in a wav seq.
The blue german synth has some nice waves :-). To get the original ones into the OASYS is also a good idea... have to check who owns a 2.2 or 2.3 which is still working.

Peter

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:46 pm
by peter m. mahr
see posting below

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:47 pm
by peter m. mahr
Addendum - V2.0

- portamento for polysix

- improved sample management (format import, auto loop, etc)

- resynthesis

- ethno sample library (mid and far east, africa, celt, etc.)

- oberheim or sci exi (ob-xa, ob-8, matrix or p5)

- prophecy exi

- better vocoder (comparable to rolands v-synth xt)

- convolution reverb (like Altiverb)

- a sequencer doing justice to the OASYS

- a kind of database in which envelope, efx, filter, etc. settings can be stored and recalled independent from exi or exs.

- random function for sound programming

- more sound banks (access via "soft 2nd function")

last but not least ...

more accuracy before releasing new OS (test routine for Betatesters ?!)

Peter

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:03 am
by beyarecords
Hi,

how about:

1. 24bit/96KHz sampling rate as standard!
2. 32 tracks of HD audio - record up to 32 at a time! Ok 16 tracks of HD audio with the ability to record all 16 simultaniously! (I'm just trying to see how I can make this device my main work tool instead of Nuendo!)
3. kick ass sequencing facility!

Blessings and Love

Beya

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:31 am
by Tokke
It would be handy to have some true insert effect slots (before the level stage) exclusively for each timbre/track in combi or sequencer mode. When using effects like guitar amp simulators or compressor/limiters, the level faders are useless; you have to set the volume level of the sound within the effect settings, having you switching around between the effects to set the different levels.

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:55 am
by jg::
When using effects like guitar amp simulators or compressor/limiters, the level faders are useless

That's a very good point, Tokke. It probably just needs a switch (pre-fader or post-fader), since it can sometimes be handy to have control of the level beforehand. Like when putting more than one sound through an insert effect -But you're absolutely right that modelled overdrive/amp simulators change their sound according to the input level. Therefore, the faders must be used to set the nature of the sound, and can't be used for mixing.


jg::

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:53 pm
by Rainer
The blue german synth has some nice waves Smile. To get the original ones into the OASYS is also a good idea... have to check who owns a 2.2 or 2.3 which is still working.
Look for instance at http://www.hylander.com/miniwave.html .

Rainer

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:22 am
by danatkorg
jg:: wrote:
When using effects like guitar amp simulators or compressor/limiters, the level faders are useless

That's a very good point, Tokke. It probably just needs a switch (pre-fader or post-fader), since it can sometimes be handy to have control of the level beforehand. Like when putting more than one sound through an insert effect -But you're absolutely right that modelled overdrive/amp simulators change their sound according to the input level. Therefore, the faders must be used to set the nature of the sound, and can't be used for mixing.


jg::
The problem with this is that "IFX" are themselves busses; multiple tracks can go to a single IFX. I agree that per-track inserts would be good.