Page 2 of 3

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:22 am
by apapdop
Good to see the paintbrush. A clean studio is a happy studio... :D

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:10 pm
by Ted3000
Paul Hartnell from Orbital, guys. Orbital. And he says he finds it fun, a joy, useful, and that he's going to use it on his next solo album.

Reaction: "He's lying!" (not mostly from this forum.)

I wonder what would have caused zero controversy? What would have avoided the pile of negative comments that every gear video ever made racks up?

1. First of all, Orbital would have to mean more to everyone personally. So let's somehow put The Altogether in the top five of every viewer, by electronic magic.

2. Paul would have to praise it with total hyper enthusiasm - lots of empty calorie words like "AMAZING" and "SO MASSIVE" and of course "REVOLUTIONARY," and you should see him tossing his old gear into a scrapheap.

3. Then, the patterns he plays would have to be in the exact genre and style that's your favorite - and everyone would agree. The tracks would not be little sketches recorded over a room mic, but fully mastered and slamming, somehow coming out of the machine directly.

4. You'd also have to not be nursing a grudge against whatever feature was left out of the pot when they cooked this thing.

5. The concept of trolling would have to take a few weeks off.

Then, and only then, would the comments not be negative.

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:14 pm
by apapdop
It's "Insides" for me. "Out There Somewhere Pts 1 and 2". Oh lordy...

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:27 pm
by Ted3000
Hard to argue against In Sides. The Box pt. 2 is such a landmark, those weird off-axis drum loops!

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 4:10 pm
by colulizard
So, my feeling was he likes it but doesn't love it.
I'm guessing this from the fact that if he didn;t like it he would have not endorsed it.
As a comparison of enthusiasm levels, here's him talking about the Bass Station 2 a couple of years ago. In this demo the loops he plays are also pretty uninspring
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqJvXEtwNBc

He played a gig recently on the same set as Mistabishi, and i know that he was very impressed with what Mr Pullen was doing with one machine and one hand (his words).
So i think he probably does like it.

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 4:38 pm
by _INTER_
If you look closely you see someone threatening him with a gun in the shadow. :)

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 5:16 pm
by colulizard
I posted a blank reply, which is a bit annoying.
I can't be bothered to write it all again and so I'll just summarise.

Here he is commenting on the NovatioN Bass Station a year or so ago. I'm not sure if he sounds more or less enthusiastic here compared to Electribe....
The loops he plays though are also uninspring. But that's because he's demo'ing the sounds... maybe that explains the Electribe loops... a demo of the sounds he's tweaked from it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqJvXEtwNBc

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 7:35 pm
by Pygmy
Hey Ted3000, here's the video that Paul actually *wanted* to do :)

http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2015/ ... p-odyssey/

Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 7:45 pm
by Pygmy
colulizard wrote:Here he is commenting on the NovatioN Bass Station a year or so ago. I'm not sure if he sounds more or less enthusiastic here compared to Electribe....
For real? He only mentions 10 times the bassstation is amazing, how it's helped complete his album, how all the basslines he was struggling with were replaced by bassstation synthlines, how it kept him from having to reach for the modulars for that... and on and on.

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:48 am
by Lotek
He does sound a tat more enthusiastic in that Odyssey video. By a margin of let's say: 25%, so the Odyssey must be 25% better than the electribe.

Am i right? :P :wink:

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:04 am
by colulizard
Lotek wrote:He does sound a tat more enthusiastic in that Odyssey video. By a margin of let's say: 25%, so the Odyssey must be 25% better than the electribe.

Am i right? :P :wink:
Of the demos I've seen him in the ARP looks the most enthusiastic.

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:24 am
by Frenzies
The 20 odd minutes through the brown album from Planet of the Shapes, through Lush, Impact and remind are about as good as dance music has ever been. He can say and do whatever he likes forever now, he gave me that, and he gave me Glastonbury 1994, the best live dance set ever.

I like Orbital.

Does it show?

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:47 am
by colulizard
Frenzies wrote:The 20 odd minutes through the brown album from Planet of the Shapes, through Lush, Impact and remind are about as good as dance music has ever been. He can say and do whatever he likes forever now, he gave me that, and he gave me Glastonbury 1994, the best live dance set ever.
Are you me?

Also, there was a New Years Eve at Brixton Academy on the turn of 93 / 94 Orbital played at. It was better than Glasto.
But those merged tracks on the brown album are amazing - still to this day totally amazing

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:56 am
by Frenzies
colulizard wrote:
Frenzies wrote:The 20 odd minutes through the brown album from Planet of the Shapes, through Lush, Impact and remind are about as good as dance music has ever been. He can say and do whatever he likes forever now, he gave me that, and he gave me Glastonbury 1994, the best live dance set ever.
Are you me?
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:00 pm
by apapdop
My walk to work in the late 90s/early 00s used to take slightly longer than "The Girl With The Sun In Her Head" and "Out There Somewhere Parts 1 and 2" played one after the other. Playing these three tracks on a fine spring morning on my MiniDisc Walkman and i swear, my heart would be singing with joy by the time i got to work. When Orbital were good, they were very, very good. I was always struck by how "vanilla" the sounds they used were, but hell's teeth they could put a track together.

Gotta say, i was well chuffed when i saw this video, one of my musical heroes using and praising a piece of kit (in an entirely level headed and down to earth fashion) that i really like. I don't class myself as a wide-eyed innocent when it comes to advertising and shilling, but in this case, to think that he said what he said purely because he was paid to do so is cynical and just plain lazy.