Korg Forums

I appreciate your kind comments about the manuals.

pandel wrote:I don't want to argue, I just thought, that the different development teams that worked on the parts of the OS would have had some basic doc stuff to coordinate what they were doing.

While I can't comment specifically on our internal development processes, in general, that is true. On the other hand, there are many functions which are handled entirely by one team, in which case there are different requirements for coordination (API's, for instance, as opposed to the details of internal processes). My team is not involved directly with the file system.

pandel wrote:And finally, I think, a product like the OASYS has to be accompanied by a complete (!) end user documentation, even if some work still has to be done!

Absolutely, and I believe it is. I assume you are not meaning that the internal file format falls into the category of end-user documentation?

Thanks for going into development detail a little bit I understand.

danatkorg wrote:
Absolutely, and I believe it is. I assume you are not meaning that the internal file format falls into the category of end-user documentation?

No, not really! The only thing that seems to be missing in this category is the detailed MIDI implementation with every sysex message explained... But this could also be too technical to put it in the end-user documentation category.