Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:23 pm
by popmann
There is no better product so let´s not make one
Then....make one.
My response is to the idea that it's not the best workstation keyboard. That's not even questionable logic.
As someone who has worked with midi for 25 years...workstation keyboards have always been lightweight compared to software in the sequencing dept. always. Always.
Now, is their an inheirent reason for that? I don't design midi software, so I don't know. But the implication that Korg should improve their sequencer to be better than products with VERY different development environments...and frankly use cases...is foolish. You compare apples to apples. Right now, they make the best apple. Next year? Maybe....maybe not...
I hope Korg will continue Kronos updates.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:00 pm
by kronoSphere
If one day, KORG no longer wants to make new updates of the Kronos O.S., it would be, maybe, very interesting if an authorized company could continue to assume further upgrades. And why not, every one of us here could pay a reasonable fee for these upgrades to be done.
Re: I hope Korg will continue Kronos updates.
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:14 pm
by neomad
kronoSphere wrote:If one day, KORG no longer wants to make new updates of the Kronos O.S., it would be, maybe, very interesting if an authorized company could continue to assume further upgrades. And why not, every one of us here could pay a reasonable fee for these upgrades to be done.
Korg will never accept that, except by inverse engineering ( see mpc 1000 features with unofficial OS are great).
