RightExaJeff wrote: The guy is truly awful !
Almost as bad as the Akai guy...
He is ALWAYS showing the same thing and saying the exact same text.
So even if there's 50 youtube videos, it's like there's only one...

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever
I hate all of these menus in Korg R3, I would never buy something like that again NO matter how powerful it is.Re-Member wrote:Here's a much better video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbXZgtW ... 1421914688
There's loads of extra editing features in the menus, plus it allows for pattern chaining for full song creation. If Korg doesn't release an update soon fixing all the bugs on the new Electribe, Roland is totally getting my money.
The Roland has 2 virtual analog poly voices, 1 mono analog voice, and 1 drum kit, vocoder, 4-part sequencer ,and effects in a mini-key 3-octave plastic synth format.supermel74 wrote:This new Roland synth blows the Electribe 2 away big time. It's not even close.
The Roland has 128 note polyphony, the Korg only 24. The Roland has true polyphony, the Korg is "pseudo-polyphonic".Roland counts the entire drum part as 1 track. If you count every individual drum as a part like Korg does then the Roland has many more parts/tracks. Mini midi jacks suck.Mini keys are better than drum pads for playing synth parts. The Roland sounds leaps and bounds better, even from crappy youtube videos and the filter is very smooth with no stepping according to the product demonstrator. Korg f***ed up BIG time with this new one. Unless it gets a complete overhaul there's no way in hell that the Korg is a better machine than the new Roland.Ted3000 wrote:The Roland has 2 virtual analog poly voices, 1 mono analog voice, and 1 drum kit, vocoder, 4-part sequencer ,and effects in a mini-key 3-octave plastic synth format.supermel74 wrote:This new Roland synth blows the Electribe 2 away big time. It's not even close.
The electribe 2 has 16 4-voice paraphonic parts that can be anything from drums to virtual analog synth to PCM samples, 16 filter types, 16 insert effects, a master effect, audio input, direct output to Ableton Live, 16part sequencer in a backlit pad metal case groove box format.
So it's a little apples to oranges. If you like the Roland's format and features better, then it blows it away. If you like the Korg better, then the Roland is a toy.
One thing is certain - newbies and kids will flock to the Roland and the model will be associated with beginner demos on YouTube.
The electribe will retain status and cred.
The JD-Xi is a nice value but it does not offer the deeper synthesis that the MicroKorg XL or the Novation MiniNova has.
Sounds like you prefer the Roland approach.supermel74 wrote:Korg f***ed up BIG time with this new one. Unless it gets a complete overhaul there's no way in hell that the Korg is a better machine than the new Roland.
but on the Korg the drum parts will typically eat up about half or more of those 16 parts and about half the available polyphony. If your drum track requires 13 parts the Korg is left with 3 parts and maybe 11 notes of polyphony. The Roland is left with 3 parts and still over 100 note polyphony. What if you need 16 drum parts or more? You're SOOL with the Korg. If you're going to use the Korg as a groovebox you need to count each drum as a part. If you do that on the Roland you have at least 26 drum parts (going by the pics I've seen) plus 3 synth parts for a total of 29 parts. 29>16Ted3000 wrote: You can do that with the roland but you've hit some big limits right away - only 4 elements at once. Electribe has 16.
Here's a resonable real-world kit: A kick, a snare, closed hat, open hat, clap, ride cym, crash. That leaves 9 electribe synth parts. Nine.supermel74 wrote:but on the Korg the drum parts will typically eat up about half or more of those 16 parts and about half the available polyphony. If your drum track requires 13 parts the Korg is left with 3 parts and maybe 11 notes of polyphony. The Roland is left with 3 parts and still over 100 note polyphony. What if you need 16 drum parts or more? You're SOOL with the Korg. If you're going to use the Korg as a groovebox you need to count each drum as a part. If you do that on the Roland you have at least 26 drum parts (going by the pics I've seen) plus 3 synth parts for a total of 29 parts. 29>16Ted3000 wrote: You can do that with the roland but you've hit some big limits right away - only 4 elements at once. Electribe has 16.FTR, I've always preferred Korg's "groovebox" concept to Roland's. With these new devices however, Korg screwed it up and Roland nailed it.
a reasonable kit for straight up rock music but very limited for other stylesTed3000 wrote:
Here's a resonable real-world kit: A kick, a snare, closed hat, open hat, clap, ride cym, crash. That leaves 9 electribe synth parts. Nine.
.
You think the JD-Xi won't have any bugs or shortcomings?supermel74 wrote:Unltil all the bugs are sorted out the Electribe is a colossal failure.
Not trying to be argumentative but I don't agree with that at all. It has good synthesizer functionality for a groovebox but to say it's one of the most powerful ever made is a stretch. In many ways the EMX is more powerful. The E-mu Command Station is more powerful. Almost all of the Roland Grooveboxes are more powerful. The Elektrons certainly are as is the Tempest and the Spectralis and the Yamaha RS8000 and RM1x. Apples to oranges for sure but in terms of "power" I'd say the Electribes are naer the bottom. That being said I still prefer the Electribes to most of those other machines. Ease of use and workflow matter more to me than sheer power. Price is also a major consideration too.NickZoll wrote:Korg e2 is glichy but it's still one of the most powerful grooveboxes ever made. .
I would like to know more details on that, hope Korg will add that to a parameter guide 2.0MAX. 24 voices (The number of simultaneous sounds in entire pattern depends on the type of Oscillator, Filter or Insert Fx.)