marc1 wrote:GregC wrote:
Given all that, and its 7 yr old limitations , the K2 is still an impressive keyboard.
Exactly!
kronoSphere wrote:
I suggest for the next son of Kronos a drawer with the motherboard and its memory inside to be easily changed each time. We are in 2018 or not ?
That doesn't make much sense to me. Given the fact that the "unimpressive" Intel Atom inside the Kronos does quite a good job at what it does, just imagine what Korg could implement in a future product. If it's ever going to happen, you probably can expect a processor, which is not just twice but 3 or 4 times as powerful as the current one. And being an imbedded system , the processor inside the Kronos for the most part is just there for music creation, unlike a standart PC.
GregC wrote:
Korg' has to look forward vs 'just keeping up'. Something tells me Korg' does not want to play in the rear view mirror/computer component game anymore with a w/s.
That's what I am thinking. Playing catch up in this fast paced age is exhausting. And I'm glad Korg decided to offer the Oasys/Kronos platform its well deserved longevity.
without a doubt a good 7 yr run for a w/s is impressive. But, ( you knew that was coming), many or some of us experience polyphony problems as we stack
up on the SEQ and run out of FX. That limit is processor related, simply speaking.
Yes, I know, use a DAW. But that is opposite of the ' all in 1 work station '
solution. Or buy a 2nd Kronos. Or buy another type keyboard.
This also underlines how fast software has evolved. Hardware components are bound to have a ' shelf life '.
And as components start to fail, ( buttons, LCD, key felts, other internals) in 3-10 years where will 10,000 Kronos owners go for parts ? To 3rd party speculators on eBay ? None of this sounds like any fun. (I am not one of those
that thinks ' since my 1990 Kronos keyboard still works, my Kronos will last 15-20 yrs).
When I consider all the potential long term issues with relying on components from other cos there is tangible cost risk and questions of availability.
I am not much for sentimental on new product design. For cos like Roland, Korg and Yamaha , its a business, #'s , cold facts, etc.
There is a fair argument against another expensive hardware all in 1 workstation. With the assumption of a required 5 year shelf life.
BTW, keyboard owners are fickle.
If I was president of Korg, I would put my R & D on a hybrid software solution.
And have minimal reliance on outside components. Due to the reasons
stated above.