Page 3 of 5
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 5:55 pm
by popcorn
I gave my word too...
Donny
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 5:00 pm
by Lorenzo
it's great to see korg is not only listening but Asking... just wrote down my thoughts
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:34 pm
by RVNOak
I just did my survey!!
I would just die if they came out with a keyboard that had 10 individuals outs and a seq with 48 tracks!!!
I would... I would just roll over and die all happy

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:40 am
by DrWho
Great survey !!!
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 3:11 pm
by tenshi
Hello + Long time no-see
Just finished with the survey.
Good to see this place is well alive and most of the familiar faces still around
^tenshi-
start on O2
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:57 pm
by universal1
this is quite easy.
Now, As the Software is not so but also needs updating seriously and coz the Oasys is very far behind hardware wise I think its just better to Just drop the Oasys and concentrate on building the Oasys 2. but this time with the hardware that at least is current. I jsut think its rtruly a waste of time and resources trying to package something that is not cutting it hardware wise.
reason, We are now in the world or quad cores and near octa cores!! miles more hard drive space and miles more Ram. THe current Oasys is veryt very Limited and not to mention the fact that you cant really interface it with a computer and its 2008!
THere is just too many great Options out there and the New Kuzweil pc3 is amazing for the price. Good sounds is not the only thing when one is buying a so called workstation. Simple. sorry guys but its the truth!
U1
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:19 pm
by Troy
Just found it...and thanks. Now, ignore everyone else's until my deman...uh...good suggestions are implemented. ha ha ha
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:14 pm
by PadreSol
At our current level of use and experience the survey was too much right now. We'd have to come back in the future to answer many of those questions. From our current perspective as new users we feel the documentation could be much improved. That's not to say that the information's not all there. Just that it could be organized in a way that was more suited to beginners/neophytes. Perhaps a guide that was organized as a how-to with detailed steps. The website would also benefit from a reorganization of the current information that it contains.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:08 am
by bkboy
Thanks. Can you please put a Fantom-G style piano roll editor for the sequencer and bar graph display for volume output for each track in the M3 so we can know when we clip graphically?
I love the Fantom-G's display and its awesome look...wonder why Korg didn't do a design like that...but anyway I love the sounds of the M3/Triton...
These should be possible with an OS update. I know what is not possible with an OS update is more insert effects like on Fantom-G since that is hardware based.
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 2:02 am
by ausser
Jerry -
enjoyed very much filing out the feedback form - and thankyou for the opportunity -
Its a very well put together survey and certainly affords the survayee to contribute as amply and as detailed as one might feel - any contribution one feels one might have to make to the Korg company.
Peace
Ausser.
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:31 pm
by AVI6520
DEAR- Jerry Kovarsky
Korg Technology Senior Product Manager
Korg USA
Great! Perfect!
Can you give the same offer for the PA's?
It seems there users need to have this possibility too, to be relaxed with there feelings,
Can you?
LOVE YOU-AVI.
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:06 am
by georgeinar
PadreSol wrote:At our current level of use and experience the survey was too much right now. We'd have to come back in the future to answer many of those questions. From our current perspective as new users we feel the documentation could be much improved. That's not to say that the information's not all there. Just that it could be organized in a way that was more suited to beginners/neophytes. Perhaps a guide that was organized as a how-to with detailed steps. The website would also benefit from a reorganization of the current information that it contains.
I agree also that the manuals need to not only provide us with the exact parameter details, but also to provide us with either simple exercises or "what this feature is good for" type tips. I will see how ams cc#60 can be assigned thru some gadget, but why would I want to do that, what usefullness does each feature provide, some are very obvious, but I scratch my head at times in certain modes why this or that option is there and when if ever I would use it and why.
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:56 pm
by DrWho
Yea - the manuals are more of a reference once you know what piece of info. your after. The DVD tutorials are well worth it. I have them for the TS, but not for the M3.
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:22 pm
by Rob Sherratt
Hello Korg USA,
Why don't you want our input on the Pa series? I guess there are too many bugs to cope with eh?
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:43 pm
by DJerkins
Oh Yeah, add arranger software to my list of availible upgrades for my super expandable Korg (see previous post). Anyone got anything else you want to add to it? Lazer lights, chrome etc.?