I am not sure that I completely agree.Bachus wrote:This is the main reason why arrangers are a dying breed..Niki_Keyz wrote:Not really important but if korg does release a pa5x, they should really update the drum kits and styles we had on all the previous PAs.
The styles and drum kits are there for people to use but from what era are they from? I don’t hear any music TODAY made with anything close to those drum kits or styles.
Just my opinion people.
Its not just Korg, but all arranger keys..
Modern styles are from the 80’s or 90’s of last century..
They should start making styles for todays music.
While at the same time catching up for the last 2 deccades..
Seems however korg does not dare to push arrangers in that direction..
Thats because this is Kronos terrotority..
They should start with adding va and fm from the kronos
And karma and engines that emulate other keyb instruments
And then use all of that in styles..
I will take this a step further, the launchpads of ketron are more suited for todays music then korg or yamaha’s traditional music style engine
Adapt to that..
I do agree that the arrangers of today should offer more modern sounds and sound packs (drums, pianos, EPs, etc...) and make them more compatible with 3rd party stuff much easier. Expanding the available memory (Flash, RAM, whatever) would make this easier to do.
With the arranger portions, it is simply a matter of programming content that meet today's styles. This too can be done by the manufacturer or again, third party companies. The arranger portion is a template that can be infinitely updated through the programming of new styles.
There are a number of solo artists and groups (maybe more than we even realize) that need styles from all genres and all eras of music. I know that personally, I use most eras and genres of music depending on the gig I am doing. For my nursing home ministry, a good number of Big-Band, Country, Waltzes, etc.. are needed. By and large, Korg meets this, as do the third party additions I have added. For my band, we do more rock and progressive and it is lacking. For my solo stuff, I use the MP3 soundbeds I create in my studio and simply play over the top with custom Keyboard Sets. Styles are not important for me with my solo stuff.
For rock and such, there could be more variation and the sounds (especially distorted rhythm guitar) could be better. This not the fault of the style, but rather effects to make the guitars more 'real'. More styles for progressive music would be appreciated, but with the time signature changes and tempo changes, that might be more difficult.
Since I do not play any rap, those don't personally matter to me.
For R&B and Soul, there could be a few more styles to reflect the modern grooves.
It seems as though it is a matter of programming styles to make the arrangers more 'relevant' to today's stuff. The tech is there, we just need to program it...
I would, personally, LOVE to see KARMA implemented in an arranger. I think that many of our issues may be resolved as a result.
Arrangers kind of get a bad rap because many people want new stuff in it, and while they do supply some of it, there could be more content.
I think that adding FM and VA and stuff kind of moves the arranger away from what the initial arranger was designed to do. While those may be a great addition, I think that it moves the arranger to more of a synth instead of a 'box' with styles in it.
Having something like a Kronos with arranger functions would be the best, but what would the cost be? I see it being fairly cost-prohibitive for most users in a unit like that.
Are we willing to purchase a unit with all the features from the Kronos and the PA Series for around $5K to $6K? I think that it would put it out of reach for many, if not most, users. I would be included in that group, at least for a while. Maybe the ultimate arranger unit would be a combination of the full functionality of the Kronos (multiple audio outs and everything) and the PA4X.
Another function of the arranger, at least for me, is the ability to plug in start playing. This requires internal speakers. It is vital, at least for me, to have in-built speakers so I do not need to bring a PA to most gigs. I am fine with bringing a PA to some, but I perform 4-5 times a day on many days. Dragging an external PA system increases set up time and makes my rig less portable. Maybe that is the difference between the PSR consumer series and the professional series. Since I do both, I would still prefer something with speakers in it. I can always turn off the speakers when I use an external PA system.
Grace,
Harry