Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:21 pm
I guess 1k tops.
A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio. Hosted by KORG USA.
http://www.korgforums.com/forum/phpBB3/
http://www.korgforums.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=78564
You are independent. You just proofed it!Sharp wrote:I'm sure a lot of thought went into calling it King Korg too.EvilDragon wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUHn3V5k ... e=youtu.be
It is retarded to have filter cutoff on the RIGHT side of the board. :S
Saxifraga wrote:You are independent. You just proofed it!Sharp wrote:I'm sure a lot of thought went into calling it King Korg too.EvilDragon wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUHn3V5k ... e=youtu.be
It is retarded to have filter cutoff on the RIGHT side of the board. :S
Well the official specifications are up on the Korg website and it has... tada! Zero synthesis options. It's literally as bare bones subtractive as you can get with an Fx section and tube slapped on at the end of the signal chain. I'd call tnis the most unimpressive/overhyped thing Korg has released since Krome.Kronik wrote: ...but I'll wait to see what sort of modelling and specs the oscs are (no mention of Sync, Ring Mod etc).
It's not mixed up.javaj wrote:ok, so anyone catch the piano in on of the demo tracks. HUH??? Acoustic piano- how can that be? Makes me question if the demos are mixed up. They also have some Hammonds in there. We need some more videos of this thing
I'm sure it's the same pcm piano sample in the MKXL.javaj wrote:ok, so anyone catch the piano in on of the demo tracks. HUH??? Acoustic piano- how can that be?
CharlesFerraro wrote:Well the official specifications are up on the Korg website and it has... tada! Zero synthesis options. It's literally as bare bones subtractive as you can get with an Fx section and tube slapped on at the end of the signal chain. I'd call tnis the most unimpressive/overhyped thing Korg has released since Krome.Kronik wrote: ...but I'll wait to see what sort of modelling and specs the oscs are (no mention of Sync, Ring Mod etc).
It can be reasonably assumed that you can't use sources as controls in the mod matrix. That is, I highly doubt you'll be able to patch the output of an oscillator to global pitch for instance. I'm expecting the patch sources to be exactly like the MMT engine. IF you're right and it actually has a legit mod matrix, maybe something as flexible as actually being able to repatch the whole signal path in a modular fashion then yeah, King Korg would be a beast! But you know it's not going to be like that for the price. I don't see ring, sync, or cross modulation between the oscillators, it can't do anything fancy like additive resynthesis and I even doubt the LFO will be faster than 100Hz like MMT if that. 3 osc with analog modeled waveforms, some ROM and a (single) multimode filter sounds sooooo boring it's unbelievable. If you want innovative synthesis options look to software (Alchemy, Zebra), or instruments over 2.5k USD (V-Synth, Kronos).EvilDragon wrote:CharlesFerraro wrote:Well the official specifications are up on the Korg website and it has... tada! Zero synthesis options. It's literally as bare bones subtractive as you can get with an Fx section and tube slapped on at the end of the signal chain. I'd call tnis the most unimpressive/overhyped thing Korg has released since Krome.Kronik wrote: ...but I'll wait to see what sort of modelling and specs the oscs are (no mention of Sync, Ring Mod etc).
How do you mean ZERO synthesis options? It has virtual patches, which is basically a mod matrix. There's 2 LFOs and 2 envelopes in there. It's not really zero!