Page 6 of 20

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:29 am
by Bachus
billysynth1 wrote:Hi

I think one important thing is left our from your discussions...doesn't Stephen Kay have a contract with Yamaha?

Billy
I dont believe so Billy...
I think he created KArma Motif as an undependant developer as a 3rd party tool..

I asked Steven a while ago if we would see a Montage version of Karma..

He answered in all fairness,
Steven Kay on the Karma lab forums wrote: If Yamaha releases a new Motif XF-level replacement, I would be interested to see if I can add support for it to KARMA Motif. Or new MOXF-level keyboards. From my perspective, it really depends on what they do with the voicing. The reason I can support the current 6 different models (XS, XF, Rack-XS, MOX, MOXF, S70/S90 XS) is because they all have the same set of internal voices available - so the KARMA Performances work across them all without having to be rewritten completely.

With the article indicating backwards compatibillity, we might indeed see a Karma version for the Montage..

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:01 am
by Derek Cook
Kevin Nolan wrote:I was recently given the nod by someone that something from Yamaha was coming and that I'd like it.

Coupled to Richard Dvine saying that what's coming has alien technology it took home weeks to get his head around; I think we're only getting the bare bones of what's in Montage. Alternatively, there is something else coming as well.

The name Montage and a new FMX synth engine with the new and sophisticated hints out there suggest this is a significant synth beast, where traditional FM is, by default, accommodated. My point being - I think this will be versatile.


Regarding the posts on the versatility of Kronos - I fully endorse that. As an owner of two OASYS, I still, every day, 10 years later, power it on and still feel it's like an exciting new beast. No other synthesizer, other than the CS80, has ever given me that feeling over such a long time. And indeed MOD-7 is gargantuan in its own right, but alas has essentially remained unused by new musicians and programmers so it has never been exploited like it can be. MOD-7 is a cutting edge semi-modular digital synthesizer, which can accommodate traditional FM and indeed elements of RCM synthesis, and is a credit to Korg, and indeed to Korg R&D and Dan Philips. An awesome synth engine, still to be exploited.


I'm not looking to compare Montage and Kronos - but I am delighted that Yamaha are now including serious synthesis back in the large format synth/ workstation. It's important because it delivers amazing sonic results (as the SY77 and EX5 at their best still demonstrate today FAR beyond traditional Romplers).

And, although Motif always underwhelmed me, the more recent MOX range seemed to me more stylish, and by then, Yamaha's 'synth' attributes in it were exquisite - in particular its filters sound very good indeed - so if Montage builds on that, with all the other bells and whistles, it probably doesn't matter whether is has a Virtual Analogue synth on board - it's Rompler waveforms and subseqend digital / VA synthesis are good enough by now (heck I love my JD800 as a kind of VA even though its waveforms are PCM and its digital filters from 1991).

In any case - FM-X will be a VA by default - is you don't use any oscillator modulation, as with MOD-7. Not sure how many realise that, without modulation, MOD-7 is an amazing VA with 6 oscillators per voice - and with the ability to randomly set the phase of each oscillator, sound amazing. Can't remember the exact polyphony of it, but, if 50 voice polyphony - gives 300 oscillators available to a program. I have one Unison program (16 note unison) with two Mod-7 sounds playing in the program so that as single note stacks about 80 oscillators - on one note :-)

So it's highly likely FM-X can be configured similarly (even the DX7, SY77 and sY99 can operate in this way!) - delivering an awesome VA synth too.


Finally. - if this is successful, it legitimises the market, and can only but provide both healthy competition for Korg and a push to extend Kronos towards a bright future too whether updated or renewed.
Kevin's points are interesting, especially the one about using FM oscillators into a conventional synth path. The SY range had some amazingly analog sounds for its era; and when you look at those, they were usually comprised of AFM elements - I.e AFM going into a very organic sounding filter. (My description might be a little over simplified!)

An interesting point on gearslutz was the wish that if you allowed VA oscillators to go into the AWM section, why would you need a dedicated VA engine? Finally, with all that FX processing claimed, if FDSP made a long overdue comeback, all that would start getting me pretty excited,

I am now quite intrigued.....

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:01 pm
by Hooked On Sonics
http://sandsoftwaresound.net/wp-content ... ontage.png


Ahhhhh Keys from the Darkside or maybe Yamaha has Awaken ... :-)

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:11 pm
by Kevin Nolan
By the way - this isn't a workstation. It has no sequencer (beyond scratch pad sequencing).

And it's 128 voice AWM, 128 voice FM-X (8 Operator algorithms)

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:18 pm
by Synthoid
Kevin Nolan wrote:By the way - this isn't a workstation. It has no sequencer (beyond scratch pad sequencing).
Most unfortunate...

Image

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:38 pm
by lunaluna
I wonder if it still limited to only four Voices in performance mode , and only 128 user locations ? If I remember well as the Motif's are .

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:46 pm
by Derek Cook
lunaluna wrote:I wonder if it still limited to only four Voices in performance mode , and only 128 user locations ? If I remember well as the Motif's are .
But the Motif was 16 part multi timbal in MULTI mode...... My Motif Rack ES where I gigged with it was permanently in MULTI Mode

128 locations, yes, but I never got anywhere near reaching that limit in a set for gig....

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:48 pm
by Derek Cook
Kevin Nolan wrote:By the way - this isn't a workstation. It has no sequencer (beyond scratch pad sequencing).
Not a problem for me as all of my sequencing is in a DAW. What is important is a good performance mode like the EX5 (as in setting up and controlling external units). Having said that, I probably have the Kronos to do that, so a role reversal would not be the end of the world...

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:22 pm
by Kevin Nolan
I've no info on the number of parts - but surely it'll be 16 part.

The exciting dimension to it is 8-operator algorithms (no formant capabilities) but otherwise like the FS1R and indeed the famed GS1 and GS2 (even my DX1 is still only dual 6-operator algorithms :-) ).

... and of course the onboard 6GB of PCM sampled instruments :-)

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:37 am
by aron
The more I read, the more it seems "normal". I just want to know if it's 128 AWM + 128 FM = 256 or dynamic.

https://translate.google.com/translate? ... t=&act=url

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 2:47 am
by Kevin Nolan
It's 128 AMW2 + 128 FM-X - trust me on that. (Uncle Kevin has his sources ;-) ) !!

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:56 am
by aron
Wait so it is NOT 256 notes dynamic assignable but rather 128+128 like the good old days? Like a super powerful SY99

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:39 am
by Bachus
Kevin Nolan wrote:It's 128 AMW2 + 128 FM-X - trust me on that. (Uncle Kevin has his sources ;-) ) !!
Not with the ne Sw72 ship... thats a restriction based on the old sw52 chip..

knowing that the sw72 chip is inside the instrument, we need to see and wayt, but its probably true 256 voice poly..

We will know by next week.

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:40 am
by Kevin Nolan
Believe me my friend - it's 128 + 128. My source has played it.

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:46 am
by billysynth1