M3 Feature Request

Discussion relating to the Korg M3 Workstation.

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever

stevenpanter
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:23 pm
Contact:

M3 Feature Request

Post by stevenpanter »

Hello.

I have an idea/feature request for the guys at Korg to (hopefully) contemplate. It's mainly intended for those of us like me who have the M3-M, but keyboard owners may be able to benefit somehow as well.

Anyway, I was thinking that because M3-M owners lose the ribbon controller, joystick, SW1 and SW2, maybe it would be possible to have a a virtual representation of them on-screen instead? Something like the following maybe:

Image

So you would simply press on the virtual SW1 or SW2, run your finger around the joystick area or along the ribbon controller area. What do any of you think?

Regards
Steven Panter
stevenpanter
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:23 pm
Contact:

Post by stevenpanter »

Nobody else interested then?
User avatar
Sharp
Site Admin
Posts: 18221
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 12:29 am
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Sharp »

I could use something like that for sure as I have the M3 connected to a Yamaha Piano.

Regards.
Sharp.
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="530"> <tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1" width="267" height="94"> <a href="https://shop.korg.com/kronossoundlibraries"><img name="Image110" src="http://www.irishacts.com/images/Image11_1x1.png" width="267" height="94" border="0" alt="KORG Store - Irish Acts"></a></td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1" width="263" height="94"> <a href="http://www.irishacts.com"><img name="Image111" src="http://www.irishacts.com/images/Image11_1x2.png" width="263" height="94" border="0" alt="Irish Acts Online Store"></a></td> </tr> </table>
User avatar
Kontrol49
Platinum Member
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:03 pm

Post by Kontrol49 »

Certainly a Useful innovation,given it can double as a Kaoss Pad type interface why not this too...


Roland included a similar thing for the V synth XT so those who opted for the rack model still had access to the hardware Time trip pad functions via the touchscreen.

I suppose they never thought of the idea as they may have assumed that anyone using the Module by itself through midi would perhaps have a dedicated Controllor keyboard or use external means of controlling the missing hardware controls
jmexio
Junior Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:03 am

Post by jmexio »

On a related note, I think it would be great it Korg chose to offer the keyboards on themselves.... I mean, if I buy the module right now there is no upgrade path to the 88 key version (for example), other than selling the module and buying a new M3. This seems odd to me, since they are biulding a system based on exchangeable parts and not selling the parts! It would also be neat to be able to have two keybeds (61 & 88, for instance) and pick between them.

Makes sense?
User avatar
Rob Sherratt
Platinum Member
Posts: 4590
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:49 pm

Post by Rob Sherratt »

I hope that Korg will change their minds and in future sell the bare keyboards and frames separately from the modules. Also they should make a 48-note-keybed the same width as the module. And I think Steven's idea is a good one and it would be a useful feature for a future OS upgrade. But bear in mind that in X-Y mode you can already assign joystick motion to the touch screen if you wish. Also you can assign other buttons and sliders in the control surface area as controllers.

I think a better "improvement" for a future OS release would be to allow users to assign Program or Combi changes to programmable keys on the keybed. So you hold the Program or the Combi button with one hand, then touch a key on the keybed, and the assigned Program or Combi is selected.

Also I think there should be an "EFX lock" option that allows Program or Combi changes to be made on the fly during live play without any white outs in sound occurring. At the moment the only way to change sounds is to program up a Combi first (with a limit of 16 tracks) and then mute/unmute tracks. That is an awful compromise to make. I think Korg could do a lot better with an "EFX lock" option that permits smooth Program and Combi changes so long as the user can live with the currently selected EFX.

Best regards,
Rob
User avatar
shrike
Platinum Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Croatia, Dugo Selo

Post by shrike »

So you hold the Program or the Combi button with one hand, then touch a key on the keybed, and the assigned Program or Combi is selected.
You can do this within the sequencer and using RPPR function. You are surely aware sequencer can double as combi mode (the same functionality), so you can copy combi settings into sequencer, leave one track free and use it for RPPR patterns. Create one pattern with sysex messages which will change programs in used tracks, program pattern to work as a one-time-trigger and assign pattern to a single key. Assing the track in which pattern resides to the same midi channel at which your other tracks (which serve as combi) operate. Track with RPPR pattern should be zoned only to one key.
That's it. Pressing that one key will trigger the pattern which will trigger sysex messages which will change programs in tracks. Or change effects settings. Or something else, there is really no limit.
User avatar
Rob Sherratt
Platinum Member
Posts: 4590
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:49 pm

Post by Rob Sherratt »

shrike wrote:
So you hold the Program or the Combi button with one hand, then touch a key on the keybed, and the assigned Program or Combi is selected.
You can do this within the sequencer and using RPPR function. You are surely aware sequencer can double as combi mode (the same functionality), so you can copy combi settings into sequencer, leave one track free and use it for RPPR patterns. Create one pattern with sysex messages which will change programs in used tracks, program pattern to work as a one-time-trigger and assign pattern to a single key. Assing the track in which pattern resides to the same midi channel at which your other tracks (which serve as combi) operate. Track with RPPR pattern should be zoned only to one key.
That's it. Pressing that one key will trigger the pattern which will trigger sysex messages which will change programs in tracks. Or change effects settings. Or something else, there is really no limit.
Hi Shrike,

This is a really good tip, thank you very much. Could I zone the RPPR track to one octave and use up to 12 different RPPR trigger patterns? Is there an example that you've done in a similar way that you could send me as a starting point?

Another question, using RPPR's is it also possible to provide "arranger" type start, variation, fill and ending sequences that play seamlessly without "white outs"? If that is possible, I wonder why there are no examples on the market. Kid Nepro to the rescue?

Best regards,
Rob
User avatar
shrike
Platinum Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Croatia, Dugo Selo

Post by shrike »

Could I zone the RPPR track to one octave and use up to 12 different RPPR trigger patterns?
You can have as much patterns in RPPR as you wish, so there is nothing to prevent you from having 12 patterns in one octave in the same track. Or in multiple tracks.
using RPPR's is it also possible to provide "arranger" type start, variation, fill and ending sequences that play seamlessly without "white outs"
I wrote about this in topic about using M3 as a drum machine. It's the same thing. You see, there is really no limit to what you can program in a pattern. Pattern can be musical pattern, can be drum pattern, can be data pattern (with inserted "Event" as Korg calls it, or pure sysex messages). Patterns can be velocity switched, key zoned, midi channeled. With sysex you aren't even midi channnel dependent.

Xpanded upgrade offers sequencer feature non-present in Triton line - M3 presents sysex code for events. You don't even have to understand sysex and still be able to work with it. For example, record one bar in one track and change program from A001 to A002 in that bar. Then go to event editor and see what M3 has to say about it in terms of sysex. Next time when you add that event into pattern and assign that pattern to a certain track, triggering the pattern with a key (RPRR) will trigger program change. Simple, isn't it?

Changing sounds without an interuption can supposedly be done with Karma scenes, but I wouldn't know how to do that, I don't do Karma.
If that is possible, I wonder why there are no examples on the market
If all workstation features would be presented by Korg or by someone else immediatelly after the release, where would be thrill in personalizing the workstation? My Extreme doesn't work like someone else's Extreme and that's fine. Workstation comes with a lot of presets just to give you an idea of possibilities - the actual limit is way beyond presets.
But I don't know why I'm explaining this to you, Rob, you proved your self as a power user so I apologize if this sounds tutoring, I'm just trying to answer questions and give some ideas.

Another reason for good stuff not being comercially available. Imagine this - currently I'm working on a perfect reproduction of a drum rhythm, very complex one. I'm reproducing it from actual drum waves recorded from a real drummer performance. The process includes separate quantizations (off-beat ticks - the rhythm tends to drop out of the basic 4/4 measure in which it actually plays in the middle and to return to the basic beat just before the end of the measure; although in 4/4 mathematically, it's played everything but 4/4) for each variation of the rhythm. Drummer performed one basic rhythm structure and over 30 (thirty, not to mistaken) variations, not fill-ins, breaks and stuff, but rhythm variations.
The material will be programmed to work as Extreme's RPPR and as ordinary MIDI track (so I can use it with VSTs as well).
Now, I already spend about 20 hours. I predict to spend 20 - 30 more. Let's round it to 50 hours of labor. For just one rhythm.

How much should I charge for that? And how long would it take until some smarta$$ makes it available for free download? There is no way one can protect his data, it's just midi. You see the point? The good stuff can be bought. And downloaded. The best stuff resides in personal keyboard and can be heard, but not acquired.
Is there an example that you've done in a similar way that you could send me as a starting point
Rob, excuse me, but I remind you again that I don't actually own or have M3. I had it for long enough to see I don't need it. So I can't make that example for you.
But the procedure is really a simple one.
Try assigning simple musical pattern to RPPR. See how it works.
Then change a sound while recording another pattern, in the middle of the performance - event data will be created which will be responsible for program change. Find that event, extract it and assign it to empty pattern. Assign that pattern to RPPR and trigger it - it will trigger program change on midi channel you are currently playing at.
If you use sysex, there is no midi channel limitation.

Knowledge about all of this (if it's of any interest to you) - I play strictly Korg workstations. And can't sleep if I don't know how it works until the last byte. So I learned everything I could about Extreme; probably there is something more, but I'm satisfied with what I know. M3 isn't much of an upgrade over Triton line (except for Karma, which hasn't any value to me, but I appreciate it's possibilities) so basics are the same. About usage of RPPR for program change - one other individual wrote about that in this forum too, but I don't know who, I recall seing something about that.
About sysex - individual named Krzysiek (no longer active on this forum) enlighted the sparkle in me for sysex. Now I see sysex can do miracles and am yet to discover it's applicability in complex setups.

Best regards,

shrike[/quote]
User avatar
shrike
Platinum Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Croatia, Dugo Selo

Post by shrike »

I just realized I'm way of topic here. Sorry.
User avatar
Rob Sherratt
Platinum Member
Posts: 4590
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:49 pm

Post by Rob Sherratt »

Hi Shrike,

Thank's very much for your helpful and detailed answer. Sorry I forgot that you have a Triton Extreme not an M3. I seem to have many "senior moments" these days. Anyway, after about the next 6 months working with RPPR's on the M3 I'll report back and you can see how well (or badly) I got on.

Best regards,
Rob
User avatar
shrike
Platinum Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Croatia, Dugo Selo

Post by shrike »

Anyway, after about the next 6 months working with RPPR's on the M3 I'll report back and you can see how well (or badly) I got on
This is one of the rare ocasions you and I corespond. But I read everything in PA2X section and I know you gave a great piece of info there. So I seriously don't believe it will take you six months for this.

You can create style elemetns (variations, breaks, fill-ins...) on your Pa2x, can't you?
Imagine RPPR as style elements on steroids. So just create style elements on M3. You will see it's even way easier than on arranger.

Imagination is the only limit.
jerrythek
Platinum Member
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 11:06 pm

Post by jerrythek »

It's funny that you are discussing this, as I have been preparing some tips/examples of exactly this concept. Within a pattern you can have notes, controllers, Sys. Ex. - anything is possible. But too often we only think of them as for playing back note-based phrases. Imbedding controllers or Sys. Ex. is a very creative application, and then you can choose to trigger them from the keys, or set a Chord Pad to do it.

I have also been experimenting with moving the RPPR range off the active keyboard range by transposing in Global Mode and then readjusting the sound ranges on the Track Parameter transpose control. This way I can shift the RPPR active range down off the live key range.

I'll write this up soon, and provide a .SNG file to show the concepts - with the V2 Sys. Ex. implementation its really easy to work with these commands for the first time, and I've got some cool stuff happening.

Stay tuned!

Regards,

Jerry
User avatar
Rob Sherratt
Platinum Member
Posts: 4590
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:49 pm

Post by Rob Sherratt »

jerrythek wrote:It's funny that you are discussing this, as I have been preparing some tips/examples of exactly this concept. Within a pattern you can have notes, controllers, Sys. Ex. - anything is possible. But too often we only think of them as for playing back note-based phrases. Imbedding controllers or Sys. Ex. is a very creative application, and then you can choose to trigger them from the keys, or set a Chord Pad to do it.

I have also been experimenting with moving the RPPR range off the active keyboard range by transposing in Global Mode and then readjusting the sound ranges on the Track Parameter transpose control. This way I can shift the RPPR active range down off the live key range.

I'll write this up soon, and provide a .SNG file to show the concepts - with the V2 Sys. Ex. implementation its really easy to work with these commands for the first time, and I've got some cool stuff happening.

Stay tuned!

Regards,

Jerry
Jerry, thanks for the message and for working on the RPPR based .SNG file and documentation. The M3 is HUGE, it's like exploring a new country. Every corner I turn there is something new to experience and learn.

And for me, MIDI-ing up my Pa2x and M3 has been a great move. The arrangements and sounds I'm making (playing live) are like heaven on earth :lol:

Best regards,
Rob
User avatar
BasariStudios
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 4:56 am
Location: NYC, USA
Contact:

Post by BasariStudios »

Rob, this is not personally to you nor it has to do something with you,
i dont know if you read my other post but i wonder:
Why do i see everybody on this forum claiming THIS MACHINE IS HUGE,
THIS MACHINE THAT, THIS MACHINE CAN DO THIS AND THAT (i agree with
that too) i dont put down the machines but why noone comes up with a problem???
Is it cuz people dont know the machine and tweak volume and fx only?
Is it cuz they ignore the problems??? What the hell???
Does anyone know anything deeper then twisting volume and pan???
Same thing with Stephens KM3 software for KARMA, many have it, many
praise it ( i do too and i love it, probably the bst thing i've touched) and i have
it only 4 days, menaged to create over 30 PRO GEs from scratch, edited the COMBIS thru
it, come up with bugs which i still have to test and confirm...noone else did
even though people have it for months...am i really Arogant and Rebelious???

I dont write this for show off, it pisses me off cuz i have no support,
i feel like i am the only one in 15000 using this machines full power.
http://www.basaristudios.com
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL.
2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.
Post Reply

Return to “Korg M3”