How much use do you give each engine.

Discussion relating to the Korg Oasys Workstation.

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever

Post Reply
User avatar
Sharp
Site Admin
Posts: 18221
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 12:29 am
Location: Ireland
Contact:

How much use do you give each engine.

Post by Sharp »

Hi all.

If you where asked to break down the different engines in the OASYS to a percentage value based on how much you use them, what would that be for you.

My usage would be.

HD-1: = 78%
AL-1: = 5%
CX-3: = 0%
STR-1: = 5%
MS-20EX: = 5%
PolysixEX: = 5%
MOD-7: = 2%

Have to say that's pretty shocking to me actually when you see it like that, but really it means I might use HD-1 for 10 tracks and the other engines for the remaining 6 in a song. So it's not that bad actually and everything does get used.

Not poor CX-3 though. You can't screw with it and make anything funky with it on it's own. It's either straight up or not at all. Which obviously will suite many and I'm by no means saying something bad about it here.

For me it seems that Sampling Modelling seems to be the new killer engine with very few people getting it right. Those who have though like WIVI http://www.wallanderinstruments.com/ have produced sounds that far exceed PCM based sounds, and I'd love to see KORG include something like that at some point in the future.

Regards.
Sharp.
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="530"> <tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1" width="267" height="94"> <a href="https://shop.korg.com/kronossoundlibraries"><img name="Image110" src="http://www.irishacts.com/images/Image11_1x1.png" width="267" height="94" border="0" alt="KORG Store - Irish Acts"></a></td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1" width="263" height="94"> <a href="http://www.irishacts.com"><img name="Image111" src="http://www.irishacts.com/images/Image11_1x2.png" width="263" height="94" border="0" alt="Irish Acts Online Store"></a></td> </tr> </table>
User avatar
SoulBe
Senior Member
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: Germany

Post by SoulBe »

Hi,

according to me playing a lot of covers I would say:

- HDR 1 (esp. EXs 3): 55 %
- CX3: 15 %
- AL 1 + LAC 1: 20 %
- MOD7: 9%
- STR1: 1%

but it really depends; for 80ies Covers I use a lot more LAC1 and MOD7 of course,

SoulBe
Daz
Retired
Posts: 10829
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2002 7:35 pm
Contact:

Post by Daz »

It varies, but it looks something like this :

HD-1: = 40%
AL-1: = 20%
CX-3: = 0%
STR-1: = 10%
MS-20EX: = 10%
PolysixEX: = 5%
MOD-7: = 15%

Daz.
User avatar
nitecrawler
Platinum Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:47 pm
Location: from a mile high to the the AZ desert

Post by nitecrawler »

SoulBe wrote:Hi,

according to me playing a lot of covers I would say:

- HDR 1 (esp. EXs 3): 55 %
- CX3: 15 %
- AL 1 + LAC 1: 20 %
- MOD7: 9%
- STR1: 1%

but it really depends; for 80ies Covers I use a lot more LAC1 and MOD7 of course,

SoulBe
Interesting survey. I played a lot of covers last nite as well, but more from the 60's and 70's, along with a good amount of blues. Therefore my breakdown goes as follows:
HDR 50%
CX3 40%
STR 10%

When I work in my studio, CX3 drops down 10 or 15% and the others go up porportionately. EX3's get more attention.

nitecrawler 8)
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... dID=807494

Montage M7, Pa5x76, Nautilus, PA3Xle, Oasys 76, Mini-Moog, EMU Audity 2000, Motion Sound KBR 3D amp, Presonus and Reaper DAW W/Tannoy Reveal 501A powered monitors
rtucker55
Junior Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:41 am
Location: South Central Indiana

Post by rtucker55 »

Looking at my projects, over the last year, usage has been:

HD-1: = 90%
AL-1: = 2%
CX-3: = 3%
STR-1: = 5%
LAC-1: = Not Authorized
MOD-7: = Not Authorized
EXs-3 Brass & Woodwinds: = Not Authorized


Regards,
Rick
Dany
Senior Member
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:26 am

Post by Dany »

This reflects the main reason, why I've purchased the OASYS. Finally because of the STR-1 and MOD-7 which are Synths that are a further development of my Yamaha SY-99 (Mod-7) and the Yamaha VP-1 (STR-1). Yamaha has built some of the most innovative synths in the past, but meanwhile they stopped the production of Synths. The Motif is a Rompler and sounds like a Tyros. So the final reason that I've purchased an OASYS-88, was the announcement of the MOD-7 Synth. If it wouldn't include the MOD-7 and STR-1, I wouldn't ever have purchased a KORG product. So therefore the OASYS is my first KORG-Synth.
STR-1 : 30%
MOD-7 : 30%
AL-1 : 10%
MS-20 : 10%
Polysix : 10%
HD-1 : 9%
CX3 : 1%
User avatar
jhibshman
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 6:03 am
Location: San Diego, Ca
Contact:

Post by jhibshman »

I like this thread. Interesting. Just guessing here, but my breakdown goes something like this:

MOD-7 : 30%
MS-20 : 20%
Polysix : 15%
AL-1 : 15%
HD-1 : 10%
STR-1 : 10%
CX3 : 0%

I favor the MOD-7 because it just sounds SO GOOD and I prefer the routing. Not a big Organ user so that answers that. I see myself using HD-1 a lot more though after the latest sound set. I'm pretty impressed by what has been done with the latest release!

Jeff
tonybanks
Full Member
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:27 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by tonybanks »

At present it's:

CX3: 39
HD1: 59

Roughly.
I am using some individual prg based on AL-1, MS20, Mod7, Polisix, which I can say sum to 2%.
None of the prg or combi I use, are preset.
User avatar
Charlie
Platinum Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:33 am
Location: Austria

Post by Charlie »

Cool thread - open's one's eyes! 8)

HD-1: = 35%
AL-1: = 10%
CX-3: = 1%
STR-1: = 2%
MS-20EX: = 10%
PolysixEX: = 7%
MOD-7: = 35%

My favourite is Mod7. As for HD1 I quite often use Karo - so I suppose that quotes for HD1, too. My music very seldome requires Organs - so CX3 is underused - although it sounds excellent. MS20 I like for solo-sounds or lines. AL1 was just recently discovered. If I would take the time for programming new sounds, Mod7 would be the weapon of choice! :twisted:
Post Reply

Return to “Korg Oasys”