Page 1 of 1

You Decide! What should the plural of Kronos be known as?

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:38 am
by iixorbiusii
Hello,

This topic has been discussed elsewhere, and quite unintentionally here: http://www.korgforums.com/forum/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=63646

So perhaps as Forum Members, we chuck in our suggestions as to what the plural of 'Kronos' should be, put all ideas into a poll and agree on the most popular choice??? Seems democratic and fair :lol:

If possible, could you make your suggestion bold, big, or in a different colour, so it doesn't get missed?

My suggestion for what it's worth:

Kron-i



Cheers.
iix.

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:23 am
by jimknopf
As I said elsewhere, the only correct plural for an old greek word with -os ending would be -oi, so Kronoi. On the other hand, a plural of the original term doesn't make much sense (if you think of the greek god name or of abstract time).

Of course you can call it like you want.
Kroni doesn't sound bad, and it is short, so why not.

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:04 am
by orpheus2006
Kronos is a name and should be kept as is.
So it is
one Kronos Workstation
two or more Kronos Workstations

We also do not have a plural of the name OASYS, do we?

Just my 2 cents!

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:30 am
by michelkeijzers
orpheus2006 wrote:Kronos is a name and should be kept as is.
So it is
one Kronos Workstation
two or more Kronos Workstations

We also do not have a plural of the name OASYS, do we?

Just my 2 cents!
I think there should be a real plural. For every type name you normally can make a plural by adding -s (like fiat unos, fiat bravas etc). I don't know exactly the US plural rules tough for something endign with s. Bus will be busses so then Kronos would become Kronosses but Kroni sounds better.

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:18 pm
by EvilDragon
I'd say Kronii, double -ii indicating length.

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:33 pm
by EJ2
Just as the plural for deer is deer, so too should the plural of KRONOS be KRONOS.

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:04 pm
by Pepperpotty
How about Kronoseses? Or if you have lots and lots of them it can be Kronoseseses.

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:07 pm
by michelkeijzers
Pepperpotty wrote:How about Kronoseses? Or if you have lots and lots of them it can be Kronoseseses.
But what makes you think deer is the same 'category' as Kronos?
Deer is a noun and Kronos is a type name and the last character is not the same.

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:25 pm
by EvilDragon
Kronos is also a noun, a proper noun.*


* A proper noun or proper name is a noun representing unique entities (such as London, Jupiter, Larry, or Toyota), as distinguished from common nouns which describe a class of entities (such as city, planet, person or car).

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:45 pm
by michelkeijzers
EvilDragon wrote:Kronos is also a noun, a proper noun.*


* A proper noun or proper name is a noun representing unique entities (such as London, Jupiter, Larry, or Toyota), as distinguished from common nouns which describe a class of entities (such as city, planet, person or car).
Ok thanks for the explanation, I only cannot think of an English word ending with -os.

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:07 pm
by PinkFloydDudi
jimknopf wrote:As I said elsewhere, the only correct plural for an old greek word with -os ending would be -oi, so Kronoi. On the other hand, a plural of the original term doesn't make much sense (if you think of the greek god name or of abstract time).

Of course you can call it like you want.
Kroni doesn't sound bad, and it is short, so why not.
I like this explanation best
I like the relation to ancient greek and the origins of words

So I'm gonna go ahead and 2nd KRONOI

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:52 pm
by rob314159
EJ2 wrote:Just as the plural for deer is deer, so too should the plural of KRONOS be KRONOS.
I am in agreement with this one.

One Kronos
Two Kronos
Three Kronos

Now that we have a number of alternatives, shouldn't this be a poll?

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:21 pm
by felsineus
I agree too.
One Kronos,
many Kronos.
But we can't really decide. It's not possible. Languages are like live beings: they go where they want.