Korg Forums Forum Index Korg Forums
A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world.
Moderated Independently.
Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The good and bad of the "M50 idea"

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg M50
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
klarnet basowy
Senior Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 279
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: The good and bad of the "M50 idea" Reply with quote

I double this thread from karma-labs forum, to discuss also here: Wink

...
I hope this afternoon to demo the M50.
Anyway, I want to share with the forumers my "a priori" ideas about the most important "good and bad" of this workstation, which is indeed something new in the budget workstation market.

The good:
- same rompler engine of the "almost-flagship" ws, the M3 (same sounds! except maybe for D/A final conversion)
- programmable arpeggiator (compared to the M3 )
- same sequencer of M3
- finally, empty slots for user sounds Razz (Tr doesn't have it)

The bad:
- no aftertouch: this is IMHO the major flaw (I don't care for sampling option), because aftertouch is an unreplaceable expression tool.

I have in these days the idea to downgrade from the M3 to the M50, because I use the M3 very little, and for what I do or will do M50 will suffice. But this aftertouch things really stop me in doing this.

Your opinion?
_________________
Kurzweil PC361
... and no Korg keybs now, we'll se in the future...
http://www.myspace.com/neogeo


Last edited by klarnet basowy on Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:39 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
klarnet basowy
Senior Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 279
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW: I'm convinced that M50 is a bargain, same EDS engine of the M3 for this price is an exceptional thing. I want only to see the ideas about this "new idea" of budget workstation (it's quite different from the idea behind the TR, Triton-Le line).
_________________
Kurzweil PC361
... and no Korg keybs now, we'll se in the future...
http://www.myspace.com/neogeo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen
Platinum Member


Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 4709

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have an M3-61, and plan to use it for live performance with the band.

Aftertouch is not a deal breaker for me, but I agree, it's would seem to me that on a workstation the calibre of the M50, it would be an included feature.
That said, it does have a joystick, and that is a feature I use constantly, and can function like aftertouch if needed.

I wouldn't have bought the M3 if my TR had USER slots. However, I'm glad I own the M3, it's a wonderful synth, and hopefully, will be even better later this week when Korg releases the newest update.

The Karma feature is absolutely cool, but useless to me on stage, an arp would be sufficient, in the studio though, it rocks!
Very Happy
_________________
Stephen
https://www.soundclick.com/artist/default.cfm?bandID=1514031
http://www.soundclick.com/jsf
http://cdbaby.com/all/jstephenfoster

Location Central U.S.A.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
BasariStudios
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 6510
Location: NYC, USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

People are getting funnier everyday. You get a downgraded version for
cheaper and they still expect it to be the M3...LOLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZ.....
_________________
http://www.basaristudios.com
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL.
2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
klarnet basowy
Senior Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 279
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BasariStudios wrote:
People are getting funnier everyday. You get a downgraded version for
cheaper and they still expect it to be the M3...LOLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZ.....


You didn't understand (this does not surprise me)
Anyway, for what concerns the rompler engine, M3 and M50 are exactly the same (except polyphony)

Ps. I don't want this thread to be flamed by you, THANK YOU IN ADVANCE!
_________________
Kurzweil PC361
... and no Korg keybs now, we'll se in the future...
http://www.myspace.com/neogeo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BasariStudios
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 6510
Location: NYC, USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

klarnet basowy wrote:

Anyway, for what concerns the rompler engine, M3 and M50 are exactly the same (except polyphony)


You said it all...and yes i unterstand you, completely, you didnt understand me
and not necesarilly it was to You but to many of them...
_________________
http://www.basaristudios.com
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL.
2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
keego
Senior Member


Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 329
Location: Liverpool UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was led to believe that it was the M50's keybed which could not produce aftertouch and that if another keyboard that ha aftertouch was connected via MIDI that aftertouch can be achieved.
_________________
Current Arsenal:
Kronos 61, Kurzweil PC3K6, Nord Stage 3, Yamaha MOXF8, Muse Receptor 2+, Mainstage


Previous:
Korg:X5D,Wavestation, N364, Trinity,Triton Classic,Triton Studio, Korg M3 61 w/ EXB-Radias
Ensoniq:TS12, SD1, ASR10
Roland:XP10, JD-800, Roland XV88, A90ex
Kurzweil:K2500RS, K2661, PC3
Nord: Electro 3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jerrythek
Platinum Member


Joined: 28 Jan 2002
Posts: 2931

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

keego wrote:
I was led to believe that it was the M50's keybed which could not produce aftertouch and that if another keyboard that ha aftertouch was connected via MIDI that aftertouch can be achieved.


Yes, this is true - the voice architecture can certainly respond to aftertouch messages. Even poly-after-touch message if you have a keyboard that send those!

Regards,

Jerry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg M50 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group