|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eli125 Full Member
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 223
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2015 4:19 am Post subject: From pa3x to pa4x |
|
|
Loading data from Pa-Series instruments
You can load most data from KORG Pa-Series instruments. The following
table shows what you can load from the other instruments. Please remember
to save the converted data after loading.
Load from Loaded data
Pa3X You can load most data as if they were Pa4X data. There are however a
few exceptions to be considered:
• Performances and STSs are converted to Keyboard Sets.
• Due to the different order in memory, Factory Styles must be manually
reassigned to SongBook Entries by using the KORG SongBook Editor
software.
• Favorite Style banks over #10 are missing and are not loaded. Since
Pa4X banks are larger, load the individual Styles into the additional locations
of the other banks.
• Performance banks over #11 are missing and are not loaded. Since
Pa4X Keyboard Set banks are larger, load the individual Performances
into the additional locations of the other banks.
• Since the number of Insert and Master FX is different, the effects configuration
can be different.
• Voice Processor Presets with the MP3 Audio harmony type are reset.
• Compressed User Samples exceeding about 200 MB (400 MB uncompressed
or ‘linear’) are not loaded.
• Global settings are not loaded.
Pa3XLe, Pa900,
Pa600, Pa300,
HAVIAN 30
You can load most data as if they were Pa4X data. There are however a
few exceptions to be considered:
• Performances and STSs are converted to Keyboard Sets.
• Due to the different order in memory, Factory Styles must be manually
reassigned to SongBook Entries by using the KORG SongBook Editor
software.
• Favorite Style banks over #10 are missing and are not loaded. Since
Pa4X banks are larger, load the individual Styles into the additional locations
of the other banks.
• When available, Voice Processor Presets with the MP3 Audio harmony
type are reset.
• Global settings are not loaded. _________________ I'm Trying To Be What I'm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dikikeys Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2015 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's hard to believe that Korg hasn't got a simple program to take the old style addresses and map it to the new ones, and spit out a new, corrected file.
Simple DB stuff here, guys.
Songbook Editor should have a macro that takes old addresses and automatically changes them to new addresses. Did it not occur to them that this was going to be a major thing for all Songbook users going from PA3X to 4X?
Same with Performance Banks, etc., etc..
Honestly, Korg, why isn't all this stuff ready to go..? Working musicians ain't got time to hand reassign thousands and thousands of entries. This software should have been ready from Day1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bachus Platinum Member
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 3127
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dikikeys wrote: | It's hard to believe that Korg hasn't got a simple program to take the old style addresses and map it to the new ones, and spit out a new, corrected file.
Simple DB stuff here, guys.
Songbook Editor should have a macro that takes old addresses and automatically changes them to new addresses. Did it not occur to them that this was going to be a major thing for all Songbook users going from PA3X to 4X?
Same with Performance Banks, etc., etc..
Honestly, Korg, why isn't all this stuff ready to go..? Working musicians ain't got time to hand reassign thousands and thousands of entries. This software should have been ready from Day1. |
Seems quite obvious to me, they changed the core to much and so lost backward compatibillity, which can be a huge point for performing artists..
I dont think this can be easilly overcome with a simple program, as some options of the PA3x got lost in the transformation to PA4x.
Not to boast Yamaha, but they still seem on par when it comes to backward compatibillity. In Roland instruments however its nearly non excistant.
Not saying its a good or bad thing, because backward compatibillity can be a drain and minimalise chances for true innovations.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asena Approved Merchant
Joined: 03 Mar 2004 Posts: 2553 Location: Sweden/Malmoe
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hope you can remember the Guy who made KORG PA MANAGER !
We all, Including the KORG will need some help there. _________________ www.globalsound.se
KORG PA 5-X/YAMAHA GENOS 2/YAMAHA A 5000
LIONSTRACK X 76 & GROOVE XR
MEDELI AKX-10
MacbookproM2-Ssd/Logic/Neuman/Kali Audio8/Komplette14SDD/ Apollo Twin/PIONEER XDJ RX 2
LOTS OF SAMPLE SOUNDS!
KorgPaManager V 5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karmathanever Platinum Member
Joined: 12 Jan 2004 Posts: 10404
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I hope you can remember the Guy who made KORG PA MANAGER !
We all, Including the KORG will need some help there. |
??? _________________ PA4X-76, Karma, WaveDrum GE, Fantom 8 EX
------------------------------------------------------------------
## Please stay safe ##
...and play lots of music
------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dikikeys Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bachus wrote: |
Seems quite obvious to me, they changed the core to much and so lost backward compatibillity, which can be a huge point for performing artists..
I dont think this can be easilly overcome with a simple program, as some options of the PA3x got lost in the transformation to PA4x.
Not to boast Yamaha, but they still seem on par when it comes to backward compatibillity. In Roland instruments however its nearly non excistant.
Not saying its a good or bad thing, because backward compatibillity can be a drain and minimalise chances for true innovations.. |
But all I'm talking about here is simple database stuff, when it comes to the Songbook....
Something USED to be in Slot A, B and C...
Now it needs to be in Slot X, Y and Z....
Simple. You write a program that takes the old Songbook entry, looks where the data is, then automatically puts it in a Songbook entry where the new data will be. What's so hard about that?
No, you are going to have issues if it comes to IFX/MFX's reorganized (although a fair bit of that can probably be automated), etc., but the Songbook is primarily just a database.
I simply feel it is bad that Korg are going to force some third party to come up with a solution (which they will) when, as soon as the new data structure was decided upon in R&D, they should have started work on the tools to allow data migration between the old Songbook and the new...
After all, you'll sell a WHOLE bunch more of a product if it doesn't make the owner do a boatload of work to move from his old arranger to the new one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karmathanever Platinum Member
Joined: 12 Jan 2004 Posts: 10404
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Concept sure is simple.
The problem could be that most of us who do more than just play a "factory-loaded" keyboard would not benefit much from this.
Tailored styles, relocated styles, mountains of FAVORITEs styles etc… let alone the SOUNDs.
This would work great from a "factory-PA3X" to a "factory-PA4X". So, if in the first place we were made aware of this "conversion-software" then we could manage our tailoring on style and sound locations accordingly.
Can't see this being a very positive investment/marketing boost for Korg though - might be great for some owners.
_________________ PA4X-76, Karma, WaveDrum GE, Fantom 8 EX
------------------------------------------------------------------
## Please stay safe ##
...and play lots of music
------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by karmathanever on Thu Oct 15, 2015 3:11 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fransman Platinum Member
Joined: 06 Sep 2008 Posts: 1095 Location: Netherlands (PA4X61+PAas. Past: PA3X, PA800, Y PSR-S910, PA500, T KN1000, Y PSR-16)
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karmathanever wrote: |
This would work great from a "factory-PA3X" to a "factory-PA4X". |
No, this SHOULD work great from a factory PA3X to a factory PA4X; it's a bloody shame it is NOT compatible.
And I don't mean fooling around with a software tool on my PC; it should be automatically processed, at least the songbook with all of the songbook entries based on factory styles!!
I've gone through the process from PA800 to PA3X and I can assure you: it's NOT a simple and easy thing to do. (although PAolo (huhhuh) is trying to make you think otherwise).
You have to remember (or have written down with ALL of your songs, which gladly I did in most cases) which style you used.
And then still a lot of tweaking is needed in some (I think most) cases.
That's not PROFESSIONAL at all!! And not even acceptable for an amateur like me.
No, PA3X will stay in my home for many, many years to come, unless Korg comes with a 2015-ish solution... _________________ Musical grtz, Frans
Play in style. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dikikeys Guest
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not even a case of factory content...
If you have a program look at the old Songbook, note the NAME of any non-ROM styles, give it a unique ID, then look for that style in the new data structure, and reconnect the link, it's job done...
Unless you have a variety of different styles all with the same exact name (perhaps sitting in different folders), this is a no-brainer. If you do have that (is it even possible in a Korg?), you get the program to rename the styles (style1, style2 etc.) then create a new Songbook that uses those new names. It's all macros, nothing too Deep Blue about it.
You just watch... pretty soon, someone will make this program to do EXACTLY all this. The problem is, it should have been Korg, and it should have already been done! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sam CA Platinum Member
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 3990 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karmathanever wrote: | Quote: | I hope you can remember the Guy who made KORG PA MANAGER !
We all, Including the KORG will need some help there. |
??? |
I think we would need some kind of key to decrypt the content of this post. Asena is the only one who has that special key. _________________ Sam
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrniceneasy Platinum Member
Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 1125 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Sam. I think he was referring to Babosh who was developing such software. He hit a brick wall with Korg..
Post was HERE _________________ Regards, Keith [pa1000]
www.korgpahelper.yolasite.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sam CA Platinum Member
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 3990 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrniceneasy wrote: | Hi Sam. I think he was referring to Babosh who was developing such software. He hit a brick wall with Korg..
Post was HERE |
Hi Keith,
I don't think Babosh and the guy who developed Korg PA Manager are the same people. Babosh dropped his project and disappeared but later on Korg PA manager was developed by a different person. _________________ Sam
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nemik Approved Merchant
Joined: 27 Jan 2014 Posts: 1725 Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Many developers is willing to write software for editing korg styles, but Korg keeping secret, won't give anybody decryption key.
I personally know programers who got all, except access to data.
So at this point we have to hope software come one day from korg . _________________ Nemik
Korg Kronos2-61, Korg Pa600, Novation UltraNova, Akai Professional MPK49, Akai Professional MPK225 , Alesis QX-49, APC25 Keys, Launchpad MK2, Korg nanoPad2
MOTU Midi Express XT, FCB1010 with UnO, Behringer X2222 USB, TASCAM Model 24 Mixer, Presonus AudioBox96, M-Track Plus
Fl Studio 21, Ableton Live 10 Suite.
Korg Pa5x Sounds at Performers Heaven |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fransman Platinum Member
Joined: 06 Sep 2008 Posts: 1095 Location: Netherlands (PA4X61+PAas. Past: PA3X, PA800, Y PSR-S910, PA500, T KN1000, Y PSR-16)
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dikikeys wrote: | It's not even a case of factory content...
If you have a program look at the old Songbook, note the NAME of any non-ROM styles, give it a unique ID, then look for that style in the new data structure, and reconnect the link, it's job done...
Unless you have a variety of different styles all with the same exact name (perhaps sitting in different folders), this is a no-brainer. If you do have that (is it even possible in a Korg?), you get the program to rename the styles (style1, style2 etc.) then create a new Songbook that uses those new names. It's all macros, nothing too Deep Blue about it.
You just watch... pretty soon, someone will make this program to do EXACTLY all this. The problem is, it should have been Korg, and it should have already been done! |
100% agree & very well put: nothing Deep Blue about it.
Modern technology must HELP instead of getting in the way! _________________ Musical grtz, Frans
Play in style. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karmathanever Platinum Member
Joined: 12 Jan 2004 Posts: 10404
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nemik wrote: | Many developers is willing to write software for editing korg styles, but Korg keeping secret, won't give anybody decryption key.
I personally know programers who got all, except access to data.
So at this point we have to hope software come one day from korg . |
Yes - you can't blame a manufacturer for protecting their products' internal designs.
However this seems like it hurts or restricts us at times. To be fair, Korg need to establish profitability when considering any additional products (s/w etc.).
OK - some here often say the software development and OS changes are simple - well that is not necessarily true unless they already know the internals, design, and testing schedules of the PA product in question.
What might seem like a simple change can often be quite the reverse.
Any changes or new S/W pushed out to us (the public) would require extensive internal acceptance testing - this is a complex product - it's music!! The combinations/permutations in the operation of any Korg keyboard go into the billions - testing would be and is a nightmare - that's why we end up with so-called "bugs" - often impossible to find until the public get hold of the products.
Changes are RARELY simple for an IT-related manufacturer.
Korg could perhaps outsource under strict NDAs and get us some great add-on software and even optional OS add-ons but that will end up being at our cost (which would be fine with me) but would still have to be justified in terms of R&D costs vs sales probabilities.
It's regular business - it's life
(MIDI Implementation Manual would be good - like in the i-series days) _________________ PA4X-76, Karma, WaveDrum GE, Fantom 8 EX
------------------------------------------------------------------
## Please stay safe ##
...and play lots of music
------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|