|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
balfi
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 Posts: 19 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:06 am Post subject: DAW recommendations to go with my Kronos? |
|
|
I got my Kronos 88 a few weeks ago and just loving it (no Kronos bashing here ). In fact it has so unleashed my music flow and creativity that I am now itching to get a good DAW to go with it. I would greatly appreciate some recommendations...am prepared to go to a more high end one rather than the lite versions. The last software I got was Cubase on the Atari ST so that shows how out of the loop I am |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jick Full Member
Joined: 03 Sep 2011 Posts: 195 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
To be honest, I really don't think anyone can answer that for you. There are a few great options, but it really depends on your workflow/personal preferences.
For me, I like Cubase a lot. It's clean, very stable (at least that's my experience) and there's a lot of options. Of course Logic Pro is a good one too if you're a mac user, otherwise check out Ableton or Cakewalk. But if I had to make the choice: Cubase 5 or 6. _________________ Rick
Youtube! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ksynth Platinum Member
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 1225 Location: Northern California, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:05 pm Post subject: Re: DAW recommendations to go with my Kronos? |
|
|
balfi wrote: | I got my Kronos 88 a few weeks ago and just loving it (no Kronos bashing here ). In fact it has so unleashed my music flow and creativity that I am now itching to get a good DAW to go with it. I would greatly appreciate some recommendations...am prepared to go to a more high end one rather than the lite versions. The last software I got was Cubase on the Atari ST so that shows how out of the loop I am |
Have you heard of FLStudio by Imageline? I think there is a version for $99 - possibly less with a search. Its PC only right now but they are looking at a Mac version too. Also a mobile version is in beta right now. Don't let the price fool you, its an awesome program.
It comes with lifetime free updates / upgrades. Lots of video tutorials too. You can download a demo version I think.
I own Sonar, Live and Acid Pro as well. These have demo versions too.
I find Live is best for flexible routing of midi and audio. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
searlstudio
Joined: 27 Oct 2011 Posts: 12
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rorcus Junior Member
Joined: 25 Jul 2011 Posts: 51 Location: London, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I absolutely love Reaper http://www.reaper.fm/
It runs in 64bit and handles a multiple channel/tracks and devices seamlessly, I have the Kronos, JP80 and Omnisphere all mapped through it. Prior to it I had used FL Studio 10 and Reason 4 but once I tried Reaper (you can use it fully and indefinitely before purchasing it) I don't use either anymore. _________________ Yamaha MM8, Kronos 61, Roland Jupiter 80 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
korgvuer Junior Member
Joined: 25 Sep 2011 Posts: 80 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:45 pm Post subject: DAWs for new Kronos |
|
|
Before purchasing anything, I think you first need to know what level of recording/mastering you want to work with and end up at. Remember, you always do get what you pay for. That being said, if you are just looking for something that will simply let you capture and prepare some tracks to burn to CD and share with friends and family, then there are a lot of products out there - some even free - to do that with. Check online for these readily available DAWs; some are available for under $100 or so. Your selection of recording programs will also depend on what platform you work with, Mac or PC. BTW, there are also some mighty fine standalone recording units, too, that will let you record 8 tracks to 24 tracks, mix them and burn to a built-in CD burner, all without using a computer at all. These units are portable, great for live recording, and provide high-end mixing features and effect processors.
If you want to take things further to an industry standard of production, then I agree with what jick says about Cubase's DAW software, made by Steinberg. With this product you can record an unlimited number of tracks, layering them as you go, apply effects, etc., and arrive at incredible mixes. To go further still, I'd recommend Steinberg's mastering suite WaveLab to create excellent final mastered tracks. Obviously, Cubase and WaveLab work hand in hand. Utilizing both, you can produce studio quality, industry standard music, ready to burn to disc or create mp3 files you can sell or share via the Internet and other outlets. Steinberg's products are available for Mac or PCs, but they aren't cheap. This is why I say you need to know what level of production you want to end up with. There are other similar products, too, some cheaper, others more expensive, but I chose Cubase & WaveLab after sizing them all up. You will also need an audio interface in order to get your music into your DAW & computer. The standalone recording units provide standard 1/4 inch ports for this.
Good luck with your efforts. With a Kronos and a good DAW you can crank out some amazing stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jimknopf Platinum Member
Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Posts: 3374
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have been a Cubase user up to Cubase 5.
I simply never really liked the Cubase UI too much.
Now I'm using Sonar X1 Producer and it's workflow and UI flexibility just "fits" for me. But that is a matter of taste and functions you use most.
If you are not too much into very powerful midi programming and are more on the audio side, Presonus Studio One is another option.
Cubase is still the standard program on PCs, but not the only choice for professional jobs. _________________ Kronos 73 - Moog Voyager RME - Moog LP TE - Behringer Model D - Prophet 6 - Roland Jupiter Xm - Rhodes Stage 73 Mk I - Elektron Analog Rytm MkII - Roland TR-6s - Cubase 12 Pro + Groove Agent 5
Last edited by jimknopf on Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SanderXpander Platinum Member
Joined: 29 Jul 2011 Posts: 7860
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
+1 on Sonar, I've used it since I got a shop deal (I was working in one at the time) on version 6. It's only gotten better since.
But honestly, the best software is the one where you know which button to press. Sonar, Logic and Cubase and to some extent Reaper, Digital Performer, Protools and even Fruityloops share so many common functions that it's more about liking the workflow than about the capabilities. And if it's the fx or softsynths you wants, likely you'll be looking at third party stuff soon enough anyway. It's kind of an endless quest, I'm sorry to have to inform you
Also consider if there are any musicians around you that you'd like to work with (or already work with) and which software they use. It's always easier to exchange projects if you use the same software. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SanderXpander Platinum Member
Joined: 29 Jul 2011 Posts: 7860
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PS I work with Logic, Sonar and Ableton regularly (and Maschine, I suppose) and formerly used Cubase. I've spent a lot of time around Protools as well. Not saying that to make me look like some kind of expert, but just to emphasize that the only reason I stuck with Sonar was that I personally got a nice deal on it and bothered to really learn the program (and shortcut keys etcetera). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
korgvuer Junior Member
Joined: 25 Sep 2011 Posts: 80 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jimknopf wrote: | I have been a Cubase user up to Cubase 5.
I simply never really liked the Cubase UI too ....
Cubase is still the standard program on PCs, but not the only choice for professional jobs. |
Yeah, I've heard this from other folks as well. I think these kind of preferences are part personal tastes, what you have gotten used to or exposed to, and financial considerations. On another hand, I really enjoyed using a standalone Yamaha multitrack recording unit I purchased a few years back; I can't remember which one it was right now because I replaced it with DAW equipment a while ago, but it produced really sweet work and was simple to use, resulting in a very good quality CD burn at a relatively low cost.
I guess the moral of the story is, there are some good choices on the market suitable for most tastes. Bottom line may be to get something that you like and is expandable to grow along with you and future technologies, because hopefully it's going to be something that you use a lot now and tomorrow. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BasariStudios Approved Merchant
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 6510 Location: NYC, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Balfi, no matter what we all say here noone is right, of course our words can
help you figure out some things but DAW to me is something like a wife/gf.
I use Cubase since 3.7, thats somewhere in 1997-98, never changed to another
DAW and now i am on Cubase 6. I also own HD ACCELL 3 from Avid/DigiDesign
which most people know as Pro Tools (for commercial purposes) cuz mos of
the musicians i see so far are DUMB...the first question they ask is if you have
Pro Tools and they judge you by that even though they dont even know crap
about recording or anything...just saw some pictures on the net probably.
My point is, Cubase is 5-600$ (of course it costed me well over 2-3000$ over the
years of updates and stuff) but Pro Tools well over 15 000$...and still Pro Tools
for me is Crap which i never use...but thats in my opinion. I will never change
to ANYTHING else except stay on Cubase, even mixing and mastering.
Thats why i said like a wife, it might be ugly and s**t but i still lover her.
(Well, i am divorced, no woman would stay with me, they ask for shoes
i point out to synthesizers). _________________ http://www.basaristudios.com
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL.
2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
popmann Senior Member
Joined: 24 Sep 2011 Posts: 350 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the important question is what you want from a daw.
Record audio?
Sequence midi?
Host virtual instruments?
How much and what kind of editing do you need to do?
For me, vst expression mapping, score editing, the dedicated drum editor/mapping are critical tools I need in Cubase. reaper? None of the above, really...but, if you just want simple multitrack audio, I see no compelling reason to pay for cubase-unless you need to get into surgical tuning and editing...and then protools is arguably more streamlined for that.
My point really is that the reason there are so many opinions is because it depends on which features are most important to you.
Another example-I used Performer, and later Digital Performer for years for midi sequencing sync'd to tape. It's conductor track and tap tempo functions, which were of upmost importance for that work, used to be unique-and are still unparalleled in straightforward ease of use...but, over the years, I've done the same function in Logic and Cubase-it's just not as simple and elegantly implemented. So, if that were your number one feature, DP is still king.
Using libraries like VSL, the Vst Expression mapping of cubase is peerless. But, most people don't use big articulation libraries like that, so they wouldn't even see that as an advantage.
Also, Cubase is cross platform, and I still work on both Mac and Windows-though my main studio box is win7 64bit. Cross platform may not matter to someone else, you know?
I've used all the major packages over the years. Damn quarter century of software midi sequencing...man, I'm old! I don't have a second choice for what I do-between the multitrack drum editing and sample augmentation to midi sequencing hosted complex virtual orchestral instruments...to drum sequencing with different kit pieces transparently mapped to different pieces of hardware and software, no other package does it all as efficiently and as well as Cubase 6.
That said, I still don't mix audio in it, because I've tried a number of software mixers and none have the open imaging and huge low end "headroom" of my old Akai DPS24. If and when it kicks the bucket, I'll buy an analog summing system for the Cubase box. Because I'm comfortable with it and it full IO and Plug delay compensation (which means not that it has it, but that it actually works spot on)...and because none of the software mixers have the sound I am used to. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jeebustrain Platinum Member
Joined: 24 Jan 2011 Posts: 1284 Location: In a Roger Dean painting
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rorcus wrote: | I absolutely love Reaper http://www.reaper.fm/
It runs in 64bit and handles a multiple channel/tracks and devices seamlessly, I have the Kronos, JP80 and Omnisphere all mapped through it. Prior to it I had used FL Studio 10 and Reason 4 but once I tried Reaper (you can use it fully and indefinitely before purchasing it) I don't use either anymore. |
I wholeheartedly second Reaper. It's super powerful, fairly easy to use, cheap, and the developers are pushing out updates like every 3 weeks (adding new features that people request on the forums). It's cross platform (Mac and Windows - and it runs beautifully for me in Linux using Wine). It's small and launches almost instantly. It's also skinnable, so you can actually make it "look" like whatever you want.
I've used Ableton Live, Sonar/Cakewalk since Cakewalk 6.0, and have dabbled with various other DAWs (Cubase, ProTools), and I prefer Reaper over all of them. There are only a few (really minor) gripes I have about it - the only feature that I really miss is a built-in full notation editor - but I've read that is coming soon. _________________ ::: Korg Kronos 88 ::: Alesis Fusion 8HD ::: Kurzweil PC361 ::: Roland V-Synth ::: DSI Prophet 12 ::: DSI OB-6 ::: Korg Prophecy ::: Moog Micromoog ::: Yamaha CP-30 ::: Alesis Andromeda ::: Moog Sub37 ::: Sequential Prophet 600 ::: Korg MS2000BR ::: GSI Burn :::
My Music |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|