vJD-800 VST.

Catch all the latest news here.

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever

NuSkoolTone
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant
Posts: 1069
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:38 am

Post by NuSkoolTone »

BasariStudios wrote:
NuSkoolTone wrote:Very Nice! I was considering sampling the heck out of my JD-990 and getting rid of it
In 90% of cases Sampling never really works...especially on synths like JD
and few others. It will be a waste of time. What makes this synths WHAT
they are is their ability to manipulate the Sounds, once Sampled, its Static,
probably it won't even sound like a JD synth. Then you will be better of
Sampling from some VSTs, you might get higher quality sounds.
If this was a modeled synth, I could agree with this. However they already START with "static" samples. Then generally it's ADSR, LFO's, and a filter which are pretty much standard.

Of course I need to double check the architecture saying this, but unless it's using special LFO types or filters it'll sound about the same. Really, how much for most uses will one be sweeping filters and using unique LFO's? Most of that work is the realm of VAs now IMO.

I really need to play with this and see what's unique, but honestly it's just been sitting collecting dust after getting one (WITH the vintage expansion card!) for a good price. I also got the memory expansion cause I couldn't believe how few patches it could hold!

I think it will be a matter of which patches are really using the filters and any effects that are unique to the Roland. Perhaps I'll do a test patch and run side by side and see how close I can get the filters etc. Chances are it'll be fine :)
Korg: KRONOS 73, M50-61, 01W/r
Yamaha: Motif XS7, FS1R
Kawai K5000S, Roland JD-990 w/Vintage Synth
midiman
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 9:20 am

Post by midiman »

Thanks for doing an AU version!
Kronos 88, Moog, Yamaha EX-5, Prophet 6, Prophet 12, Prophet X, MatrixBrute, Roland JX-3P, Behringer DeepMind 12, Logic Pro X
vEddY
Platinum Member
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Zagreb
Contact:

Post by vEddY »

Sharp wrote: No issues with stability at all to be honest. Haven't noticed anything even remotely odd yet. I've personally only had limited use with the MAC version as I'm a PC user. It's my brother-in-law who's been testing the MAC edition and there doesn't seem to be any difference in stability between either the PC or MAC. It hasn't failed in any situation yet.
Regards
Sharp.
Sounds great. BTW, tried to PM you, but it says that your mailbox is full :-)
Check out http://it-review.net. Reviews and news - hardware, software and musical instruments.
Personally? LPI. RHCE, RHCI, RHCX, RHCVA. MCITP 2008 certification done. MCITP Virtualization Administrator done. MCITP Exchange 2010 done. MCITP MS SQL 2008 done. MCT done. MCSE Server Infrastructure 2012, MCSE: Private Cloud, MCSE:Messaging and MCSE: Desktop Infrastructure done. VCP5-DV done. VCI done. MCITP: Sharepoint 2010 Administrator done. VCP5-Cloud done. VCP5-DT done. VCAP5-DCA done. VCP6-DCV done.
User avatar
Sharp
Site Admin
Posts: 18221
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 12:29 am
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Sharp »

vEddY wrote:
Sharp wrote: No issues with stability at all to be honest. Haven't noticed anything even remotely odd yet. I've personally only had limited use with the MAC version as I'm a PC user. It's my brother-in-law who's been testing the MAC edition and there doesn't seem to be any difference in stability between either the PC or MAC. It hasn't failed in any situation yet.
Regards
Sharp.
Sounds great. BTW, tried to PM you, but it says that your mailbox is full :-)
Yeah, that error is coming up in error. lol....

My PM inbox on the forum is different than everyone else's in that it's unlimited. So if you see that specific error when sending me a PM, ignore it. I will get the PM.

I need to research why it's happening though so I can fix it.

Regards
Sharp.
Post Reply

Return to “Latest News”