True, mate.Mike Conway wrote:
While it surely could be improved, the sequencer is hardly "crippled".
Yeah, I´m agree.Kudos to Roland, though! I love the sequencer on my old Fantom (which I finally got back, from Arizona) and I think the G is a huge step in the right direction. It sends a clear signal that the sequencer is the centerpiece of a workstation. Even Korg got that message, judging by their quick reaction with the M3.
If you read my previous comments, I think along those lines as well.
Yes, and thats because it is the weakest part of the OASYS, in its conception as a workstation.Certainly the angry posts are about the sequencer.
But it still has, as you mention, a lot of potential on it, to become the best sequencer ever in a WS, with its interface, control surface, the fantastic FX routing, and the 16 direct HDR tracks. etc.
It just needs more tools to edit the data recorded, like the M3 eXpanded ones and some others, and more flexibility to edit sounds in seq mode.
Just with that, and it would blown away any other internal sequencer on a workstation, IMHO, Fantom G included.