This is really a completely ridiculous topic. What is it about?
videorov starts it with a question about Oasys which he doesn't intend to buy at all and then it ends on a discussion about Audya?!
And I have to say, telling other people not to buy the Kronos is just plain stupid.
I won't be buying a Kronos and other people need to think the same. What is the Kronos future.
You buy an instrument for what it is at the point you bought it. Not what it could become based on your wishes and expectations. That's the case with every single keyboard out there.
And BTW, the Audya is an arranger keyboard. There is no point in comparing it with either the Oasys or the Kronos. Compare it with the Tyros or PaX if you want. Do you really think that Ketron will support the Audya for ten years?
Yes, Audya uses prerecorded drums and guitars and it sounds good on that part. But there are dozens of sample libraries with recorded drums and guitars on the market and they can all be used in a production on the Oasys or Kronos. The good thing is that it sounds real. The bad thing is that you have a static record and can't change anything on it. Once you use for example the pop 1 style and make your song with the prerecorded drums, with the intro, the fills the breaks and the ending, that will be it. The next time you use that style, your song will sound exactly the same. With midi you at least have the freedom to change the patterns, to record separate drum parts on separate tracks and mix them in any way you may want. Those are simply facts. The rest just requires basic understanding of how economy works. Even if Korg would open it's Oasys OS to others, does anybody really believe that there would be hundreds of "vst's" for the Oasys and their 3000 users? Do you really expect that a company would invest money to develop a virtual instrument for the Oasys with a user base of 3000 and where you know that not even everybody will buy it?