|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RKfan Senior Member
Joined: 15 Feb 2011 Posts: 402 Location: Cambridge, England
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:27 pm Post subject: Did anyone beta test the editor? |
|
|
Looks like there are a few release issues with the editor. Considering that quite a few of us volunteered (for free) to act as beta testers its a little sad that the Editor has been released in the state it has.
I think we would have spotted the screen resolution problem and some of the performance issues - but no-one contacted me. Did anyone on this forum get asked to beta test in the end?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AlchemistMusicStudio Senior Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2011 Posts: 388 Location: POLAND
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shakil Platinum Member
Joined: 08 Jan 2002 Posts: 1169 Location: New Jersey, USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RKfan... there is no screen resolution problem with the editor..... _________________ Roland Fantom-G6 ARX1, Korg M3-m exb-Radias, Korg Z1-18v, Roland MC-808, Roland MC-909, Korg microKontrol. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AlchemistMusicStudio Senior Member
Joined: 29 Nov 2011 Posts: 388 Location: POLAND
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RKfan Senior Member
Joined: 15 Feb 2011 Posts: 402 Location: Cambridge, England
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To clarify - on my set-up (with a pretty old monitor) at its highest resolution the editor runs off the bottom of the screen. As I have said in a different thread it means I need to get a new monitor in order to use the editor, and since I plan to get a new monitor in a month or so this will not be an issue. However a scroll bar on the RHS would be useful too - and save me a few quid.
My main point was that although lots of people volunteered as beta testers it seems that our offer was not taken up. And since I do testing as part of my job, its an opportunity missed.
When I get some time this week - have the week off I will have a chance to really put the editor through its paces. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GregC Platinum Member
Joined: 15 May 2002 Posts: 9451 Location: Discovery Bay (San Francisco Bay Area)
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RKfan wrote: | To clarify - on my set-up (with a pretty old monitor) at its highest resolution the editor runs off the bottom of the screen. As I have said in a different thread it means I need to get a new monitor in order to use the editor, and since I plan to get a new monitor in a month or so this will not be an issue. However a scroll bar on the RHS would be useful too - and save me a few quid.
My main point was that although lots of people volunteered as beta testers it seems that our offer was not taken up. And since I do testing as part of my job, its an opportunity missed.
When I get some time this week - have the week off I will have a chance to really put the editor through its paces. |
NDA= non disclosure agreement.
likely, the beta testers had to sign it _________________ Kronos 88. MODX8
Achieve your musical dreams
https://soundcloud.com/user-898236994 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chrutil Full Member
Joined: 21 May 2011 Posts: 194 Location: San Rafael, California
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RKfan wrote: | My main point was that although lots of people volunteered as beta testers it seems that our offer was not taken up. |
I don't think you can conclude that.
First of all any beta tester would be under an NDA and not be able to reveal that they were, indeed, beta testing.
Then when it comes to beta feedback, things like resizable GUI is feedback that is typically out of scope to change once you reach beta - but I agree that some of the more obvious glitches that people seem to have found should have been identified during a beta phase, but just because they are found does not mean that they will be addressed.
I have seen very solid software being released without beta testing, and I have seen flaky software released that went through extensive beta cycles.
If you are not satisfied with the quality or feature set of a piece of software, you surely have all rights to complain, but I don't think you can complain about it not being beta tested, because we cannot know if it was.
C _________________ Korg Kronos 88 #444 /3GB, MU modular synth, PPG Wave 2.3, Modal Electronics 002, TTSH, Oberheim Two Voice Pro, Deckard's Dream, Kijimi, MatrixBrute, Access Virus KC, Ensoniq EPS, Korg Microsampler, Behringer Model D, Behringer Pro~1, Roland JP-08, Roland VP-03, Roland JD-08, Roland TR-8, Akai MPC-X, Roland TD-12 V-Drums, Fender Precision Bass, Martin Custom D Guitar, Sterling JP-60 Guitar, PRS Santana SE Guitar (signed), Logic Pro X, Pulsar P900 Series, Arturia V Collection 6 as well as various iPad & soft synths.
Download the Korg Kronos AL-1/Polysix Graphical Editor |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SeedyLee Platinum Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 1371 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chrutil makes some good points. The purpose of beta testing is usually to find critical bugs that prevent the software from operating within its designed specifications. Unexpected crashes, lost data, UI controls that don't work are in the realm of the beta tester. Potential usability issues and general design flaws are not. By the time beta testing commences, the design phases have been long completed and the product is usually close to shipping, making radical changes infeasible.
Beta testing is like the Quality-Assurance tester on the iPad production line. Their job is to make sure that each iPad turns on, that the screen works and is legible and that the panels and chassis fit together within the specified tolerance. It'a not their job to report that the UI is outdated, that a higher-spec processor should be used and there is no expandable memory.
I am as disappointed with the usability of the editor as many of you and see it as a lost opportunity to create something brilliant. But int his case, by the time it got to beta testing, I suspect that ship had already sailed. _________________ Current Equipment:
Korg Kronos 2 88, Reface CS, Roland JV-1080, TE OP1, Moog Subsequent 37, Korg ARP Odyssey, Allen & Heath Zed 18, Adam F5, MOTU MIDI Express XT, Lexicon MX200 & MPX1, Yamaha QY700, Yamaha AW16G, Tascam DP008ex, Zoom H6, Organelle, Roland J6 & JU06A
Previous: Triton LE 61/Sampling/64MB/4GB SCSI, MS2000BR, Kronos 1 61, Monotribe, NanoKontrol, NanoKeys, Kaossilator II, Casio HT3000, Roland VP-03, Reface DX, Novation Mininova, MPC One |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mathieumaes Senior Member
Joined: 10 Dec 2011 Posts: 430
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:13 am Post subject: Re: Did anyone beta test the editor? |
|
|
RKfan wrote: | Looks like there are a few release issues with the editor. Considering that quite a few of us volunteered (for free) to act as beta testers its a little sad that the Editor has been released in the state it has.
I think we would have spotted the screen resolution problem and some of the performance issues - but no-one contacted me. Did anyone on this forum get asked to beta test in the end?? |
I don't think Dan asked for volunteers to betatest the editor, but for beta-versions of the OS...
But again, I don't think anybody got to betatest the 1.6 OS ? Or did they ? _________________ Old gig setup: Yamaha S90, Roland Fantom XR, Hammond XM-1, M-Audio Axiom 61
2011 gig setup: Korg Kronos 88 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jahrome Senior Member
Joined: 14 Jan 2011 Posts: 378 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chrutil wrote: |
I don't think you can conclude that.
First of all any beta tester would be under an NDA and not be able to reveal that they were, indeed, beta testing.
|
That's not completely true..at least from my experience. I have tested products in the past. I could reveal that I am a beta tester but just not give any additional details I am not authorized to give. _________________ Tool box: Kronos 61, Fantom FA06, ASR-10, MPCX, MPC Live, and MPC 4000. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michelkeijzers Approved Merchant
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 9113 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
It depends on the policy or NDA (generally; not Korg specific).
Some NDAs define that beta testers should not even mention they ARE testers, some NDAs define that they cannot specify when /what is the test scope and some NDAs define that information from the test (results)/details can be published. _________________
Developer of the free PCG file managing application for most Korg workstations: PCG Tools, see https://www.kronoshaven.com/pcgtools/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RKfan Senior Member
Joined: 15 Feb 2011 Posts: 402 Location: Cambridge, England
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wasnt complaining - just curious since we were asked to volunteer - just wondered if anyone was picked. What I was not asking is "was this piece of crap beta tested" - this was not my intention at all............. (misinterpreted again)....
Anyway I have had a bit more of a play with it and - since its free - can't really complain with what we were given for nothing.
Two things I think are great is (1) the ability to copy a backup of my current set-up and (2) I can write .ins files for Sonar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michelkeijzers Approved Merchant
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 9113 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well for nothing is not really true.
Part of the price of the Kronos paid is for developing the editor (if one uses it or not).
So it should have at least the minimum 'conditions' of what the software supposes to do. _________________
Developer of the free PCG file managing application for most Korg workstations: PCG Tools, see https://www.kronoshaven.com/pcgtools/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jimknopf Platinum Member
Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Posts: 3374
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is completely up to Korg if they use a broader field of betatesters or not (be sure they have some they know for long). And we will never know if any betatester gave them the appropriate feedback: that this software may work relatively stable (not crashing all the time), but anyway just isn't up to the task of speeding up workflow in a smart way.
It looks to me rather like a big parameter mirror tool, than helping musicians making music with the Kronos, and recording it into software DAWs.
Wasn't that the original purpose of developing this software??? _________________ Kronos 73 - Moog Voyager RME - Moog LP TE - Behringer Model D - Prophet 6 - Roland Jupiter Xm - Rhodes Stage 73 Mk I - Elektron Analog Rytm MkII - Roland TR-6s - Cubase 12 Pro + Groove Agent 5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|