Purple Rain Pa3x

Discussion relating to the Korg Pa3X Arranger.

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever

Saswick
Full Member
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:27 am
Location: Lancashire UK

Purple Rain Pa3x

Post by Saswick »

Pa1000
Pa900
Pa600
Previously MicroArranger
Previously Pa2x
Previously PA800
Previously Yamaha S900
Previously i30
stalian87
Full Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:26 pm

Post by stalian87 »

oh wow you found my video lol.

Hope you all enjoy it :)

Sal
Saswick
Full Member
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:27 am
Location: Lancashire UK

Stalion

Post by Saswick »

Brilliant, which style are you using or is it one of your own.

Kind Regards

Col
Pa1000
Pa900
Pa600
Previously MicroArranger
Previously Pa2x
Previously PA800
Previously Yamaha S900
Previously i30
stalian87
Full Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:26 pm

Post by stalian87 »

thanks! It's a style that i wrote unfortunately for you guys lol.

Although i will share it very soon with everyone.

Im working on a style for sing it back, moloko, right now. so ill give out a link to see what you all think of that as well.

Sal
User avatar
PraiseTheLord
Senior Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:10 am
Location: N Fort Myers, FL, USA

Post by PraiseTheLord »

Hi Sal, nice job on purple rain!

Are those Rokit 5G2's you are using. How do you like them?
Graham (Pa1000)
stalian87
Full Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:26 pm

Post by stalian87 »

Hi, thank you.

They are the 6G2's and they're bloody amazing. I got them pretty cheap as my friends owns a DJ shop. i paid £270 brand new. i only got them yesterday and they are so flat and very responsive and an absolute pleasure to listen to. I highly recommend them!

Sal
Sam CA
Platinum Member
Posts: 3992
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by Sam CA »

It sounds great. I liked the drums in particular and of course the voice...
Sam

Image

Image
User avatar
Lika
Platinum Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Greece

Post by Lika »

Very good DEMO !!!
I pressed LIKE :)
Bravo :):):)
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
http://www.youtube.com/user/mklika66
Korg PA1000
---------------------------------------------
Make Music !!!
Giner
Platinum Member
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 2:59 pm
Location: Alberta

Post by Giner »

Brilliant! Loved it. One of my fave songs and you nailed it. Got any more to put up?
When I nod my head . . . Hit it!
Pa3x-61, Pa1xPro, i30, Micromoog (1975)
stalian87
Full Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:26 pm

Post by stalian87 »

Thanks Giner,

Well i've just uploaded 3 styles for you guys to take.

Hope you enjoy them
korgpa2xmaster
Full Member
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:46 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Post by korgpa2xmaster »

Fantastic!
Dikikeys

Post by Dikikeys »

Great playing, and a great song...

Much has been made here and on another forum about it being a style or SMF, etc., but one thing I haven't really seen is a 'why'?

The truth is, this is an almost rote rendition of the original song, at least as far as chord structure goes, and I'm curious as to why the devotion to doing it in style mode, when doing it in Song mode (and using Markers to give you flexibility) would give you an identical result, but free up your left hand to play more fully..? There's much about piano playing that sounds more realistic when two handed voicings are used, but you have to restrict yourself here because the LH is tied up with the chord input.

Then, at the end, when you need to free your LH up to do the bends, you have to go through the whole rigmarole of making a Variation with the chord changes in it (when doing the chords the first time through with your LH and using the new Chord Sequencer and aftertouch pitch bend would be more true to style mode anyway!) rather than simply making an SMF from the style (or possibly you made the style from an SMF in the first place, I don't know though), dropping in markers for each section so you can mess with the structure depending on the dance floor or your mood, and achieving a less LH dependent result.

Don't get me wrong, it is still an achievement, but I am afraid it kind of begs the question, when a MUCH simpler, much more flexible alternative to doing what you did in style mode exists.... WHY? :?:
stalian87
Full Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:26 pm

Post by stalian87 »

I'll tell you exactly why...

People are always and i mean always judging you at performances. Most of my functions are wedding which means a couple things:

I need to flexibility to jump from part of a song to another whenever i want, which i wont be able to do in song mode, not easily anyway

Also people see what your doing all the time and if they can sniff at you possible not playing a song and cheating by just playing along to some SMF they will crucify me. it's just the way it is.

Those are the main reasons why and i think they're the only reasons i need to make styles rather than songs. And no i don't use smf's as you can hear the arrangement isn't anything like the original in terms of arrangement, structure it's the same but all tracks are made by my own fingers.

Hope that clears a few things up.

Sal
zox2003
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:29 pm

Post by zox2003 »

Where are uploaded styles?

Thanks
Dikikeys

Post by Dikikeys »

Sal, in my experience, as long as you keep BOTH hands busy, 99.99% of the general public don't give a toss whether you use an SMF or a style. All they want is to be entertained... In fact, next to NONE of them will have any idea what the differences actually are. Unless you are playing to other keyboard players, even few musicians of other instruments have a clue to the process.

The thing is, using Markers allows you to be as flexible as you want to. Sequences can be edited to match how YOU want to do the song quite easily, and then Markers can be used to further diverge from that form.

There are some cute tricks with Markers that few people use.... you see, an SMF can be as long as you like, so it is possible to put in alternative sections well AFTER the normal end of the song, so vamps, breakdowns, even alternate Intros, whatever you feel like can be added to the basic structure and called upon at will. It really blurs the line between the old set in stone structure that SMF's used to have, and the totally free nature of arranger playing.

The only difference is, you gain back your LH from the tyranny of mere chord input. Whether this is of primary importance to you depends a lot on how much you tend to use it. Personally, from decades of live band work, I am used to playing multiple parts using both hands, so tying up the LH for rote chord input bugs me at times. There is so much of what I do, from piano playing to horn and string work and many many more, that one hand voicings simply don't do it for me.

Now, don't get me wrong, there's much good about style mode TOO... But I can't bring myself to use EITHER method 100% of the time. Both have their strengths, and both have their weaknesses. Mostly, it's about serving the music, finding which one works best for a particular song.

But I wouldn't worry for one MINUTE that the audience cares one jot either way! As long as you keep both hands busy, they don't care!
Post Reply

Return to “Korg Pa3X”