View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
piotrek_muzyk Senior Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 484 Location: poland KONIN
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:09 pm Post subject: Mipa 2012 Kronos the best workstation !!! |
|
|
http://www1.mipa-award.de/
_________________ Pa4x 76 << Pa3x 76 << Pa2x Pro << Pa1x << Pa60 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michelkeijzers Approved Merchant
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 9113 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be strange if they didn't win (except in the area of workstations). _________________
Developer of the free PCG file managing application for most Korg workstations: PCG Tools, see https://www.kronoshaven.com/pcgtools/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sharp Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2002 Posts: 18197 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's a one horse race now days anyway.
Yamaha and Roland haven't released anything "New" in years.
Recycle.. Recycle.. rehash.. Recycle..
Yamaha's AWM2 Sound Engine is older than my house and my two kids age combined.
Regards
Sharp. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BillW Platinum Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 933 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sharp wrote: | It's a one horse race now days anyway.
Yamaha and Roland haven't released anything "New" in years.
Recycle.. Recycle.. rehash.. Recycle..
Yamaha's AWM2 Sound Engine is older than my house and my two kids age combined.
Regards
Sharp. |
Isn't the Kronos a rehashed OASYS? Isn't EDS a spinoff of HD-1? Weren't there about 10 Triton models and several offshoots of that (MicroX, X50)? I'm just saying...they're all doing it. There is nothing that unique about Korg. _________________ Korg Kronos 61 (2); Kurzweil PC4; Casio Privia PX-350m; Macbook Pro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sharp Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2002 Posts: 18197 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Every keyboard is an upgrade on the last. What Yamaha deem an acceptable upgrade over the last is a joke to me. Just look at their Arranger Tyros series for example or any of the Motifs.
KORG keep coming up with new sound engines, modelling technology, major new functions, streaming HDR, and much more....
What have Yamaha done lately to push the envelope? I really can't think of one single thing and I'm not just saying that for the laugh or as a KORG Fan boy. I honesty can't think of anything Yamaha has done in a long time that I found interesting.
The last Yamaha item I bought was a VL-70M and a WX-5. Now that's freaking cool hardware. What happened to those VL days when Yamaha were inventing exciting NEW technologies?
Regards
Sharp. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
apex Platinum Member
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Posts: 2340
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JPROBERTLA Senior Member
Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 483 Location: New Orleans
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Technically I don't know what hardware and software in the Kronos is either recycled or new. But it doesn't really matter when you look at the sum of the parts and not the parts themselves. The design and concept is certainly is unique, compared to what else is out there.
The Kronos is simply the next step in the evolution of Korg synthesizer workstations; it would be foolish for them to go off in a completely different direction considering the success they have had over the last 20 years with the design and concept of their workstation products.
But don't believe for a minute that none of this is new. The basic concept and design (i.e., 9 different sound engines in one keyboard) is newish, except for the Oasys and maybe a few other keyboards from 2nd tier manufacturers that I don't even know about.
The Motif came out shortly after the Triton and the Fantom not to far after that. These are basically sample playback synths that have been improved on over the past 10 or so years - theres nothing wrong with that, but they are not new technology, design or concept.
The Triton-like spin-offs are lesser expensive models designed to give those that can't afford flagship workstations an alternative - theres certainly nothing wrong with that. The Oasys was a bold step forward and the M-3 was an improvement in Korg sample play-back workstations - nothing wrong with that either.
If you can't see the leap here, then I believe you simply don't want to. _________________ JP
_________________________________________
Kronos2-88, Behringer XR18, Turbosound IP2000 (x2), dbx DriveRack 260, KRK Rokit 8s, Mackie CFX16, Mackie SRM450(x2), Mackie SRS1500 (x2), BBE processors (x4), Roland VSR 880 (x2), Alto TS210, Alto TX10 (x3) and SoundForge |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jan1 Platinum Member
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Posts: 765
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With the OASYS/KRONOS KORG has created a very versatile platform for their workstations, and I feel they rightly deserve the award.
Sharp wrote: | The last Yamaha item I bought was a VL-70M and a WX-5. Now that's freaking cool hardware. What happened to those VL days when Yamaha were inventing exciting NEW technologies? |
That's exactly what I was wondering when I was watching YouTube clips featuring Yamaha's instruments from the seventies, eighties and early nineties.
It seems like there was an air of adventure and enthusiasm in what they had to offer which is completely lacking at the moment. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GregC Platinum Member
Joined: 15 May 2002 Posts: 9451 Location: Discovery Bay (San Francisco Bay Area)
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BillW wrote: | Sharp wrote: | It's a one horse race now days anyway.
Yamaha and Roland haven't released anything "New" in years.
Recycle.. Recycle.. rehash.. Recycle..
Yamaha's AWM2 Sound Engine is older than my house and my two kids age combined.
Regards
Sharp. |
Isn't the Kronos a rehashed OASYS? Isn't EDS a spinoff of HD-1? Weren't there about 10 Triton models and several offshoots of that (MicroX, X50)? I'm just saying...they're all doing it. There is nothing that unique about Korg. |
I can get the same sounds using software on my uncles $300 PC
( this is a joke. this is the kind of ' opinion ' you find on other keyboard forums) _________________ Kronos 88. MODX8
Achieve your musical dreams
https://soundcloud.com/user-898236994
Last edited by GregC on Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
apex Platinum Member
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Posts: 2340
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GregC wrote: | BillW wrote: | Sharp wrote: | It's a one horse race now days anyway.
Yamaha and Roland haven't released anything "New" in years.
Recycle.. Recycle.. rehash.. Recycle..
Yamaha's AWM2 Sound Engine is older than my house and my two kids age combined.
Regards
Sharp. |
Isn't the Kronos a rehashed OASYS? Isn't EDS a spinoff of HD-1? Weren't there about 10 Triton models and several offshoots of that (MicroX, X50)? I'm just saying...they're all doing it. There is nothing that unique about Korg. |
I can get the same sounds using software on my uncles $300 PC
|
good for you. (don't be like that my man!!!) _________________ Please subscribe and follow me on Youtube and Facebook for information related audio technology.
YouTube -
https://www.youtube.com/juliusdeberryjr
Facebook -
https://www.facebook.com/majesticstudiosllc
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/majesticstudios_jld/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cpilot Senior Member
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 Posts: 427
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Sharp. My newest Yamaha arranger is 10 years old and Yamaha haven't done much since then. One of the reasons I bought the Kronos (apart from the fact that it's the best keyboard around).
Bryan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chriskk Senior Member
Joined: 10 May 2011 Posts: 349
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Yamaha's AWM2 Sound Engine is older than my house and my two kids age combined. |
So is the HD-1. The HD-1 is basically the same as the Trinity sample playback engine. A new name doesn't mean it's really new. Yamaha could name the particular AWM2 in the Motif ZK2 or whatever. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sharp Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2002 Posts: 18197 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chriskk wrote: |
So is the HD-1. The HD-1 is basically the same as the Trinity sample playback engine. A new name doesn't mean it's really new. Yamaha could name the particular AWM2 in the Motif ZK2 or whatever. |
What ?
Your kidding me right ?
Sharp. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oboemd Junior Member
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chriskk wrote: | Quote: | Yamaha's AWM2 Sound Engine is older than my house and my two kids age combined. |
So is the HD-1. The HD-1 is basically the same as the Trinity sample playback engine. A new name doesn't mean it's really new. Yamaha could name the particular AWM2 in the Motif ZK2 or whatever. |
Kinda like Korg's "old" sample streaming from solid
state drive and the "old" non-sample-playback synth engines in their workstations.
Seriously, Yamaha's flash memory is an advancement |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sharp Site Admin
Joined: 02 Jan 2002 Posts: 18197 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Seriously, Yamaha's flash memory is an advancement |
Really ?
It takes over 1 hour to populate the Chip and the Motif still has to process the data on bootup. It does so at a speed that is longer than what it takes my OASYS to load it's samples to RAM.
Regards
Sharp. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|