Korg Forums Forum Index Korg Forums
A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world.
Moderated Independently.
Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kronos Editor/Plug-In Editor and OS v1.6 are now live.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg Kronos
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bald Eagle
Platinum Member


Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Posts: 2278
Location: Long Island, NY

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cpilot wrote:
Well, I feel like boasting a little. Back in 1965 I wrote a music compiler for a mainframe. You punched up your paper tape using four characters to describe each note (a bit like midi), the compiler read it in and the computer played the tune. The computer didn't have a speaker, but since the cycle time was only 150 kHz, you could tune in the processor on an AM radio. Those were the days - steam computing!

Bryan


Very cool ... I did the same with an old IBM mainframe. Our team also used the IBM 1403 printer to create music.

For those of you not familiar with this printer it was a high speed impact printer, think of it as a high speed typewriter. You could countol the pitch by printing different strings of characters. Strings of dots or dashes wiere higher pitches and X's and W's lower.

We used to shred a lot of printer ink ribbons in those days.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
michelkeijzers
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 9113
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very creative ... I remember also a program for the Commodore 64 diskdrive that used the v snare (is that an english word?) to create music by letting it spin ... it was not really good for the drive but it sounded more or less musically.

Btw, the cards with holes reminds me of dutch (?) so called 'turn organs' where you have to turn a wheel that moves the paper with holes which is played by a big portable organ on wheels ... still used in cities on shopping days.
_________________

Developer of the free PCG file managing application for most Korg workstations: PCG Tools, see https://www.kronoshaven.com/pcgtools/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Bruce Lychee
Platinum Member


Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 856

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aron wrote:


I guess since I used to write editors and librarians for a living, I tend to side with the developers. I am definitely biased, I admit.

I do think that people tend to over-simplify how time consuming writing an editor can be. Especially when you are dealing with a changing OS and possibly bugs, thats all.


With all due respect for your experience, the bottom line is that if the user experience is crap, it really doesn't matter why.

I fully understand that software can be a time consuming and complicated process. Nevertheless, talent and resources can usually make the difference. In this case, I'm not sure what was lacking, but I know the end result is not particularly impressive.
_________________
Shigeru Kawai SK5
Roland Jupiter 80
Vintage Vibe 64
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cello
Platinum Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 2152
Location: Glasgow, UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bruce Lychee wrote:
aron wrote:


I guess since I used to write editors and librarians for a living, I tend to side with the developers. I am definitely biased, I admit.

I do think that people tend to over-simplify how time consuming writing an editor can be. Especially when you are dealing with a changing OS and possibly bugs, thats all.


With all due respect for your experience, the bottom line is that if the user experience is crap, it really doesn't matter why.

I fully understand that software can be a time consuming and complicated process. Nevertheless, talent and resources can usually make the difference. In this case, I'm not sure what was lacking, but I know the end result is not particularly impressive.


Bruce makes the point perfectly! I downloaded the K editor just to see what the OASYS might have had Wink (Joking apart there is an OASYS directory in the install so I wonder if this is an editor that started life intended for the OASYS?)

Anyway, being a process consultant I have found it takes as long to build/develop/deliver something badly as it does to do it very well.

The difference between the two is not time or budget - it is entirely down to the vision and how well it is communicated.

Judging by the comments here and elsewhere, it appears to me that something's gone wrong with the vision.
_________________
Plugged in: Fantom 8, Jupiter-X, Jupiter 80, System-8, JD-XA, V-Synth GTv2, FA-06, SE-02, JU-06A, TR-09, VT-4, Go:Livecast, Rubix44, Shure SM7b, Push2, Ableton 11 Suite, Sibelius, KRK Rokit 5,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RonF
Platinum Member


Joined: 04 Jul 2002
Posts: 1179
Location: San Diego, CA USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cello wrote:
it appears to me that something's gone wrong with the vision.


This is the exact point! The editor/plug-in is actually very cool, for what it does....it does it well, and offers a nice enhancement to the Kronos 'system'. But it misses out on a huge opportunity to truly bring the Kronos into the 2012 market as THE modern flagship workstation.

Frankly, SoundQuest "style" sysex midi editor/librarian's are a thing of the '80's, and frequently relegated to legacy gear. To see this type of editor provided for the latest Korg flagship....simply misses out on the VISION of what it could have been. What it IS is great....but its limitations, even in the most basic of possibilities (such as providing an alternative graphical representation of the Kronos synth architecture for more efficient over-view editing) are simply disappointing.....and lacking in "vision". Of course Korg has their reasons, some perhaps technical, some perhaps business related.....but in the end.....it certainly could have been more. I for one would have rather sprung for a paid upgrade if it meant adding more advanced modern features and concepts. That's not unprecedented either....look at the "free" vs "advanced" (read:paid for) editors for DSI products such as Tetra and Mopho. You can get the basics for free, or set up to the good stuff. I suspect most pay for the good stuff!
_________________
http://soundcloud.com/ronf-3/sets/ronf-music
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr1zAKpV_F226LQZrUYGPQA
Favorite Gear: Kronos 61, M3, Z1, Radias, KPro, KP3, Moog Voyager, Foogers, Virus TI, Jupiter 80, Integra7, GAIA, SPD-30, Kiwi 106, RE-201, MC808, RC505, MV8800, DSI P6 and OB6 and P12, Ensoniq SQ80, EMU MP-7, Eventide H7600, Eclipse, SPACE, Pitchfactor, Timefactor, Looperlative LP-1, Axe FX Ultra, Nord Modular, DSI Tetra, Tempest, PEK, JDXA, Eurorack Modular, Octatrack, MDUW, Monomachine, A4, RYTM, Waldorf Q Phoenix, MWXTk, Blofeld, TR8.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
aron
Platinum Member


Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Posts: 1550
Location: Hawaii

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

> With all due respect for your experience, the bottom line is that if the user experience is crap, it really doesn't matter why.

What the heck? I am only commenting on the TIME that it could take.
Whatever - keep being in your bad mood and attitude. I'm amazed you can keep it up for so long.
_________________
Korg Kronos, RD-88, Yamaha VL1, Deep Mind 6, Korg Kross, author of unrealBook for iPad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bruce Lychee
Platinum Member


Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 856

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aron wrote:
> With all due respect for your experience, the bottom line is that if the user experience is crap, it really doesn't matter why.

What the heck? I am only commenting on the TIME that it could take.
Whatever - keep being in your bad mood and attitude. I'm amazed you can keep it up for so long.


Actually, you said more than that and so did I. Not sure why you are taking it personally, as I'm just stating the obvious. If the product results in a poor user experience, users aren't going to care why. Especially after waiting a year for its release.

My attitude regarding the Kronos is shaped entirely by my experience with it and Korg. Unless you would like to buy it from me, I suggest you keep your own bad attitude to yourself. My experience with the Kronos has been crap... And I can say that with a smile.
_________________
Shigeru Kawai SK5
Roland Jupiter 80
Vintage Vibe 64
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bastimuc



Joined: 12 Apr 2012
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is very interesting to follow your posts and the discussion on the editor. It's sad that it is not the real, innovative killer application we all hoped it to be.

Actually, I would have ordered the K right away, if it was. For me (as a player in a hobby cover band) it is so important to work with intuitive and easy to use tools. The editor would have been a perfect opportunity to offer such an interface for the K...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John the Cloud



Joined: 12 Apr 2012
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:12 pm    Post subject: The Kronos Editor is not as advertised Reply with quote

On the Korg Website is says "The KRONOS Plug-in Editor (free download) lets you use KRONOS from within many popular DAW systems, as if it were a plug-in instrument. "

That is not really true because a plugin instrument has an audio element and a midi element. The plugin only seems to deal with midi. There's no way I can have the Kronos as a discrete audio source in my DAW mixer as I can with other VSTis.

Dan at Korg suggested some time ago that plugin would work in exactly the same way as a stereo plugin VSTi, and that is definitely not what we have got. So either I have completely misinterpreted what the plugin was going to be (and so has Dan), or the plugin has ended up being different from what was originally intended.

I don't regret purchasing the Kronos as it is a fantastic piece of kit, but I can't help feeling disappointed about the plugin. It should be just like a VSTi. The Kronos is capable of running as a soundcard, so I don't see any reason why it could not work as a VSTi as well as dealing with soundcard duties, or running as a VSTi in parallel with my other soundcard. It doesn't work that way, and I can't help feeling a bit cheated.
_________________
John the cloud
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RonF
Platinum Member


Joined: 04 Jul 2002
Posts: 1179
Location: San Diego, CA USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I totally get your point....and very "literally" you are correct.

But with the Kronos audio driver and the plugin as a midi effect, you certainly can use the Kronos hardware as if it were a plugin instrument. Its just not as slick as having it actually be a VST*i*. Rather you need to use two tracks, one midi, and one audio.

Not what we all expected....and I don't think its even what Korg expected when they first wrote that copy on the website to describe the plugin they thought they were going to produce. But alas...a year later... we have what we have. Its still very functional.....and in my view does not inhibit me from using the Kronos in my DAW....just with a few extra hoops to jump through. I'm more disappointed that the editor doesn't add a more efficient overview and way of editing the synth architecture.....but as far as recording the Kronos into my DAW....its all good, and the editor plugin actually adds quite a bit in this regard in its existing form.
_________________
http://soundcloud.com/ronf-3/sets/ronf-music
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr1zAKpV_F226LQZrUYGPQA
Favorite Gear: Kronos 61, M3, Z1, Radias, KPro, KP3, Moog Voyager, Foogers, Virus TI, Jupiter 80, Integra7, GAIA, SPD-30, Kiwi 106, RE-201, MC808, RC505, MV8800, DSI P6 and OB6 and P12, Ensoniq SQ80, EMU MP-7, Eventide H7600, Eclipse, SPACE, Pitchfactor, Timefactor, Looperlative LP-1, Axe FX Ultra, Nord Modular, DSI Tetra, Tempest, PEK, JDXA, Eurorack Modular, Octatrack, MDUW, Monomachine, A4, RYTM, Waldorf Q Phoenix, MWXTk, Blofeld, TR8.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
discocubsit



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm left thinking "why" and wondering how the virus ti (which is what, 8,9 years old now?) can be so slick and then krg serve up this doo doo.

Emagic Sound diver was the best of this bad breed of limited functionality compromise-ware in the late 90s, and it seemed clunky and way outdated then.

This isn't even up to that level.

It's laughable.

Why are people apologising for the cost of developing a utility for a £3000 imstrument which was sold as being provided with an integrated plug in editor?!

If korg were struggling with cost then make something decent (dare i say fitting theadvertised quality of the instrument) with more limited functionality, don't just lamely hand over some third rate Sys ex librarian and tell us how happy we should be with it.

I'm not normally a complainer but this has got my goat.

It's a top flight instrument and they sold us certain things.

It is certainly not what was described, or euphemistically alluded to in the sales literature!

Bad vibes korg!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chriskk
Senior Member


Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 349

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Why are people apologising for the cost of developing a utility for a £3000 imstrument which was sold as being provided with an integrated plug in editor?!


I don't know what their agenda is, but some will defend Korg no matter what.

The editor is Korg's face-saving attempt. They advertised it, so they had to deliver something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
afr
Senior Member


Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 315

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, after 7 pages of comments and several threads, I did not see any intervention from Korg people saying:

"OK guys, we will try to do something better"

Good,we'll wait the launch of next EXs for sale before to read a new announcement

Now I understand the tease: Prepare to be amazed Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kingtj
Junior Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2002
Posts: 87

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:23 pm    Post subject: Wow.... what to say after 7 pages of comments ? Reply with quote

All I can say is that I shared the feelings most of you expressed.
I was *way* excited to hear the editor was FINALLY released, and then all of it was sapped away as soon as I realized what the editor and VST actually were.

I'm glad we at least have SOMETHING (and it actually runs in OS X too, which is a huge plus for me). But really -- outsourced to the Sound Quest people and produced so it looks just like the rest of their outdated looking code?

With all the praise that this was free from Korg, I'd have to say at this point, how about making the SOURCE CODE free as well? Then you could get other talented programmers to make improvements on the basic skeleton, and possibly wind up with something really nice (with no more expense to anyone at Korg).

I mean, honestly, the hard part is now complete, if this editor works reliably and mimics all the functions on the touch-screen of the Kronos. A developer can look at the code to answer any questions they might have about how a given parameter is manipulated. The MISSING part is all about re-thinking the UI for a computer screen, and maybe incorporating OTHER code into it for more functionality in one place. (Imagine if all of PCGTools features were part of the editor, integrated within it?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
michelkeijzers
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant


Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 9113
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm afraid a commercial company will never give their source code away; especially not if it contains building blocks/libraries that can be reused for new material to be developed (read: new supported synths in the future).

About PCG Tools: it would be nice if they can use my source code to be incorporated ... if they will contact me I will give the source code for them to add, but also chances are that it might not be compatible (different environment, programming language, supported OSs etc).

I see one solution but that is an immense job: add all the functionality of the editor inside PCG Tools. To be honest, I will not do it, at least not for every parameter because it would take years for me alone, but if others are interested I can help/support.

Meanwhile I continue adding features to PCG Tools, because that is feasible in the near future.
_________________

Developer of the free PCG file managing application for most Korg workstations: PCG Tools, see https://www.kronoshaven.com/pcgtools/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg Kronos All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 7 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group