Electric Piano EXi..
Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever
- curvebender
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:51 pm
- Location: Sweden
- danatkorg
- Product Manager, Korg R&D
- Posts: 4205
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:28 am
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
Nope. I was deeply involved with the MOD-7 design, however.curvebender wrote:Dan,
Thanks for the info and the programming hints, I will try it out tonight.
BTW, did you program 019: VJS Reed E.Piano?..
- Dan
Dan Phillips
Manager of Product Development, Korg R&D
Personal website: www.danphillips.com
For technical support, please contact your Korg Distributor: http://www.korg.co.jp/English/Distributors/
Regretfully, I cannot offer technical support directly.
If you need to contact me for purposes other than technical support, please do not send PMs; instead, send email to dan@korgrd.com
Manager of Product Development, Korg R&D
Personal website: www.danphillips.com
For technical support, please contact your Korg Distributor: http://www.korg.co.jp/English/Distributors/
Regretfully, I cannot offer technical support directly.
If you need to contact me for purposes other than technical support, please do not send PMs; instead, send email to dan@korgrd.com
- curvebender
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:51 pm
- Location: Sweden
- MartinHines
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 12:56 pm
- Location: Topeka, KS (USA)
Re: Electric Piano EXi..
Are you sure the ARX boards do not include any samples?curvebender wrote: The new Roland workstation Fantom G has some new expansion slot that can house the new ARX type cards. It seems Roland has at last begun to develop expansion cards based on physical modeling rather than sample sets.
Anyway, one of the cards is an EP modeling card, and by the looks of it I can imagine getting a G just for that!!
Re: Electric Piano EXi..
Dan was right re: SuperNatural and physical modelling :danatkorg wrote:Not necessarily; the sound is the important thing, imo.curvebender wrote:
Really? Well, dissapointing if that's the case!
As part of being at Korg R&D, I've been working with physical models since the early 1990s. It just doesn't sound like it.curvebender wrote:But in any case (!), why do you doubt it "very very much"?..
Also, Roland to my knowledge has never released a product which used physical modeling (they've been much more into additive/resynthesis, as in the Variphrase products). It would be strange for their first such product to be an add-on card.
Best regards,
Dan
http://emusician.com/futuretech/goes_around/
Interesting stuff.
Daz.
- thekeymaster
- Senior Member
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:38 pm
- Location: Stoke-On-Trent,England
- Contact:
- RobertPlatinum
- Full Member
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:43 am
- curvebender
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:51 pm
- Location: Sweden
I do not like this superficial discussion. I think Roland is going into the right direction to offer some - whatsoever physical model or not - emulations of good e-piano sounds. There is no dedicated attempt of KORG in this direction so far, which I think is a big failure. Mod-7 is great !!!!! But it does not suffice.
My impression is that the development of Oasys does not have the drive it deserves.... but this is another topic.
Rainer
My impression is that the development of Oasys does not have the drive it deserves.... but this is another topic.
Rainer
- sebbytriton
- Senior Member
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 5:20 am
- Location: France
I suppose the "few" selling of the OASYS can't allow largest development.Rainer wrote:I do not like this superficial discussion. I think Roland is going into the right direction to offer some - whatsoever physical model or not - emulations of good e-piano sounds. There is no dedicated attempt of KORG in this direction so far, which I think is a big failure. Mod-7 is great !!!!! But it does not suffice.
My impression is that the development of Oasys does not have the drive it deserves.... but this is another topic.
Rainer
Perhaps the development's cost of each EXI is greater than the Gain ?
Wait and see, the OASYS is OPEN and not Roland's Keyboards.
French OASYS76 owner 

- curvebender
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:51 pm
- Location: Sweden
If that were the case, we wouldn't have had:sebbytriton wrote:I suppose the "few" selling of the OASYS can't allow largest development.
Perhaps the development's cost of each EXI is greater than the Gain?
1. AL-1
2. CX-3
3. STR-1
4. LAC
5. MOD-7
Right?..

Paul: Don't be nervous.
John: I'M NOT NERVOUS!!!
John: I'M NOT NERVOUS!!!
Hm - comming from the accustic piano I certainly do like real e-piano-sounds. But to be honest: I cannot see any deficits here on my Oasys. Of course, there's a big difference to a real Fender Rhodes. But once I use the e-piano-programs within a mix, it does not really matter to me. I'm happy with the e-piano-sounds offered right now and esp. STR1 and MOD7 added some really great sounds and possibilities. I can cover all types of e-piano-sounds needed for my productions with the current engines.
(Yeah - I know: different people - different taste
)

(Yeah - I know: different people - different taste

Call me crazy but I've actually found the CX7 makes for the best Rhodes-alike EP sounds. Not to diss any of the other EP sounds, in fact MOD-7 opens with my favourite (the one with the tines in the background and a bit of warmth) but the Rhodes has more of an organ timbre. Open up the stock CX7 programs and play around.
That being said, its still not quite right if you're after Rhodes. And we being perfectionists think near enough isn't good enough
I haven't had the chance to tweak any programs yet though so maybe its possible to get the right sound...
That being said, its still not quite right if you're after Rhodes. And we being perfectionists think near enough isn't good enough
