Charlie wrote: I agree: it's disappointing to have paid lots of money for an open architecture flagship and 2 years later one has to watch cheaper non-open architecture synths being upgraded with things having been asked for many times AND read "Korg listen to their customers". Well - perhaps I haven't spent enough time in the M3 forum-section and overheard their cries for a piano-roll. But I've heard this wish here a little bit earlier ... that's for sure.
If you look at the car-industry the new stuff is usually implemented in the top-class models first. Later the stuff that made sense is implemented in middle and again later in the smallest models. With Brass or KO it was the same.
But with drum-track and sequencer-updates it was not even the other way round.
Besides, theres another consequence about all this:
How all this M3 updates will affect the OASYS in the workstation market?
It will be eating dust all around the road behind the M3.
And thats not good for the OASYS future.
The costumers in the market now for a *
Music Workstation* who turn its attention to Korg, will go for the M3 instead of the OASYS hands down.
Why?
M3 has the most recent Sequencer updates, its MIDI editiors with Drag and Drop Touchscreen funcionality , MIDI sisex editing, etc, that the OASYS does not have. (Not to mention 480 ppq, Cue lists, Drum Track,etc.)
Plus, they are geting goodies like some OASYS-driven libraries for free.
...a no brainer for anyone looking for a Korg Workstation nowdays, and all for 1/3 of the OASYS price.
All this will affect the OASYS sales for sure, it will sell a lot less that it is doing now.
With this kind of decissions by Korg, the OASYS is going to a discontinued future.
So it leads me to think if is this the Korg main Idea, ´cos if it is not, all this is not very well planned, IMHO.
If not, what´s the point behind all this?

Regards.
D.