Einstein was right: God does not play dice with the Universe

As the title suggests, anything goes in this section.

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever

Post Reply
User avatar
John Hendry
Senior Member
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:13 am
Location: America

Einstein was right: God does not play dice with the Universe

Post by John Hendry »

This is a reply to Michelkeijzers in mathematics/physics and creativity that really should be under Latest News since it deals with the comma but I'll post it here and pretend it's Offtopic so it's seen. I'll come back to it later with a few things to add to it.
michelkeijzers wrote:Music is seen as a sort of bridge between mathematics/physics and creativity.
Yes....and it's all about tuning...and tuning is all about dealing with the problem of the Harmonic Comma which is a result of time being relative to tonal space, which mathematically is the same as any other space in the Universe. And it all adds up to create the creativity that pours out of this Forum with few exceptions.

Fortunately tuning is also connected to the length of a string and octaves to make space a comprehensible subject we can talk about using numbers. Musicians use their ears to describe a language of laws based on a feeling connected to it that relies on the allocation of tonal space and proper timing we call rhythm and logic. And equally simple, time only has two directions relative to the Observer that create phase throughout all its dimensions. This is why the Unified Field Theory equation was posted on Korg Forum first and understood well enough by some to understand the concept of "T" which stands for time. It also represents the strong force to those that are in to physics but is not required to understand the equation that is nothing more than a simple algebraic clock that runs off quantum gravity that causes Mass to oscillate for it's pendulum every clock has in it, as well as a CPU found in every computer. You could say it's powered by time itself but that's not technically correct. It makes sense people who play music using oscillators and filters controlled by computers would be ahead of others in understanding the UFT and the laws of Real Relativity associated with it created by adding the weight of the Observer's Mass to add to Special Relativity.

Every reason, every event, everything has a frame of information containing and connecting it in phase with the two dimensions of up and down connected to time. Adding forward and back will make your head spin. Fortunately it only spins in one direction or you wouldn't be able to read this. Your reading this is because a long frame of information shows my first keyboard was a Korg M1. The progress of tuning can be seen in the M50 sitting next to me that has the two phase directions of time relative to space marked above each key in proper ascending order that looking back in time shows the descending order. Understanding why a 5th above is a 4th below is the key to everything we can ever imagine. To avoid getting locked out of its logic you can imagine space as length and suddenly the strangest subject you can imagine makes more sense....and it doesn't stop there and only stops here for a split second till you make it to hear how I got here in the first place so we can all blame it on Sharp who owns this web site to enhance creativity, not Korg. Whoops...that's not true. First you have to blame it on Korg for making the M1, then back to Sharp, and then back to Korg for hosting it which is very unusual for a frame of information this long. Large corporations usually control this much weight, not a single individual.

And this chain of cause and effect we too often call blame that has no room for chance to change it's course the Observer effects that has caused more Wars than you want to remember because of our own free will goes all the way back in time but it always stays in phase with up and down no matter how you compare information frames that overlap each other till you get to the very end of the string that is called an inertial frame of reference in physics to measure time as well as space from that despite being a very simple concept has confused modern physicists to no end.

The original Circle of Fifths was corrected by placing tonal space relative to time to create the New Circle of Fifths that some who have not seen it said was impossible. Nothing is impossible if you add enough space to it in the right order. Why Einstein didn't do this since he played the violin is beyond me as it's exceptionally simple to do. I should point out the solution to doing it is also the primary solution to the ITS helicopter control system using electronics solving the adverse yaw problem in a single rotor helicopter system as well as building a proper flying saucer.

Einstein was right: "God does not play dice with the Universe".
E=h+{a-comma}c/λ
E=h+{
}c/λ
©JFH^^

Wikipedia article Planck–Einstein equation
"The Planck constant is related to the quantization of light and matter. Therefore, the Planck constant can be seen as an atomic-scale constant. In a unit system adapted to atomic scales, the electronvolt is the appropriate unit of energy and the Petahertz the appropriate unit of frequency. In such an atomic units system, Planck's constant is indeed described by a number of order 1."

Planck–Einstein equation corrected by separating it for entropy and Instance location of Mass by adding graviton’s phase arrow of space/time with asymmetry of the weak force added and harmonic comma CERN/SLAC data combined created placed in 4th phase proving Einstein’s famous statement is correct and quantum mechanics was wrong. Like I said in 1972. There are 4 parts in an atom: what goes up must come down. The only thing that oscillates with 3 phases/parts is a caveman’s cart with two axles and 3 wheels. Note: The ‘hole” opposite the electron in every modern book on electricity is the Graviton misnamed. Space is the force carrier of gravity. Talk about being blind…..now try measuring the electron’s speed and position….last chance.

Low to high entropy, E=h+{a-lesser diesis}c/wavelength.
High to low entropy, E=h+{a}c/wavelength. The lesser diesis is named Einstein’s comma, but here it’s Maxwell’s Demon….turned into Einstein's Angel proving he was right.

A=☼ (with Einstein’s Comma, top equation is forward arrow of time and actually at that point in time only subtracts 1/2 the value (slightly less if you really want to get technical) as shown in last CERN/SLAC calculation set subtracting 2.48e-5 from 2.58e-5 to create .20e-5 comma added to reverse phase arrow direction @ 2.68e-5.)

Credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_demon
"In the philosophy of thermal and statistical physics, Maxwell's demon is a thought experiment created by the physicist James Clerk Maxwell to "show that the Second Law of Thermodynamics has only a statistical certainty". It demonstrates Maxwell's point by hypothetically describing how to violate the Second Law: a container is divided into two parts by an insulated wall, with a door that can be opened and closed by what came to be called "Maxwell's demon". The demon opens the door to allow only the "hot" molecules of gas to flow through to a favoured side of the chamber, causing that side to gradually heat up while the other side cools down, thus decreasing entropy.

In his letters and book, Maxwell described the agent opening the door between the chambers as a "finite being". William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) was the first to use the word "demon" for Maxwell's concept, in the journal Nature in 1874, and implied that he intended the mediating, rather than malevolent, connotation of the word.

Several physicists have presented calculations that show that the second law of thermodynamics will not actually be violated, if a more complete analysis is made of the whole system including the demon." In this case the Observer.

CERN’s neutrinos exceeding the speed of light @ v-c/c=2.48 sec in 453.6 miles is an exact match creating the needed comma associated with Stanford’s SLAC E158 weak force asymmetry value showing the cause of 2.48e-5 is not the politics of a “loose fiber optic cable” checked countless times with the same “gain in space” shown by FERMI Lab’s neutrinos supporting an observation that goes back to 1947 and is summed up in 2007 by G. Nimtz and A. A. Stahlhofen who also thought it occurs outside the bounds of Special Relativity [arXiv:0708.0681v1] not aware of the simple explanation SLAC’s E158 data provides with direct proof provided by the E158 data exposing a gain in 453.6 miles also @ 2.48e-5 with a .20 harmonic comma as predicted for the needed asymmetry in the reverse arrow/phase of time the calculations reveal changing physics. Note: Comma size is based on CERN’s original v-c/c=2.48e-5 now v-c/c=2.37e-5 and the E158 ratio unchanged but I said the exact comma size was yet unknown and since Google picked up 2.48e-5 I’m leaving it there. It would appear my fist post on Nature's Forum making a correction to the E158 data was possibly correct based on another party's computations of CERN's neutrino data that left the last step out adding the second phase of the graviton proving I'm not a mathematician or I'd do it with my eyes shut. Both are well within CERN’s margins’ and that's the important thing. SLAC’s E158 data comes from the distance light travels in 1000 years at the speed of light in a ratio to a 1 hour SOL gain making this comparative measurement the most spectacular ever made in physics and does so in regard to the most important observation in the History of Man thanks to CERN and the E158 team.

What this means is E=m+{a}c2 outside the weak force as has been observed with light since we had the ability to do so where E=mc2 inside it because the original equation does not include the photon’s force carrier space the neutrino provides to exit the weak force to the strong force. So you need asymmetry to have a comma, or a comma to have asymmetry. Same thing. This changes physics far more that E=mc2 did due to the infrastructure in place to take advantage of the energy tap {a} provides. It brings back time in sync with Newton’s understanding of time but armed with E=mc2 corrected as well as Newton’s law by adding the second reverse phase in time held by “imaginary” numbers in physics that never adds up correct without {a} added to expose the second “real” phase in time. F=m+{a}a Here {a} corrects the error detected in Newton’s law and let’s gravity balance out in EM.
Think Peace...
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic”