http://www.krksys.com/krk-studio-monito ... kit-5.html

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever
I respect your opinion Sharp, but I'd like to warn the OP, or at least to give him another point of view:Sharp wrote:I also don't care one bit about the negative things people say about Behringer. Everyone I know uses Behringer including me, and I've yet to hear anyone who use them complain.
Most Behringer equipment is basically a copy of some other brand's design - they have a track record of infringing designs and coming perilously close to trademark infringement. For example, Xenyx vs Onyx. Mackie even sued Behringer for infringing their intellectual property.Sina172 wrote:IIt's basically a rebadged Genelec 1092A sub. They use the exact same parts at a fraction of the cost. Truly a steal for what it was....
Sina
I've used a Behringer mixer problem free for 7 years now. Also a behringer PA K300FX for 2 + years. No issues. And a Behringer subwoofer for 2 years. No issues.SeedyLee wrote:I can be the first, if you likeSharp wrote: Everyone I know uses Behringer including me, and I've yet to hear anyone who use them complain.
Every piece of Behringer gear I've had has failed within 2 years. Keyboard amps, compressors, mixers have all been very unreliable, and the specs are "optimistic" at best.
Having said that, I have heard their studio monitors are well regarded and I know many peopel who have them and are happy with their performance.
Well, I had a pair of truth monitors from Behringer... mere copy of hybrid from mackie HR824's and with Genelec's looks... Uli Behringer survives this way...SeedyLee wrote:I can be the first, if you likeSharp wrote: Everyone I know uses Behringer including me, and I've yet to hear anyone who use them complain.
Every piece of Behringer gear I've had has failed within 2 years. Keyboard amps, compressors, mixers have all been very unreliable, and the specs are "optimistic" at best.
Having said that, I have heard their studio monitors are well regarded and I know many peopel who have them and are happy with their performance.
Sorry Jim, I hear ya. I wasn't thinking through my definition of "reasonable". They do remain expensive! But if quality, accuracy, and ease of mixing (especially electronic) music is what you crave.....at any price, I swear by my JBL's.jimknopf wrote:Well, then my "more reasonable budget" isn't quite yours, Ron![]()
Else I certainly wouldn't reject those ...
Naw, I'll take the Focal Twins, trying to keep it "reasonable". Of course we are in a subjective area. But if the matter at hand is mixing reference "tools"....the Twins do indeed have that undeniable Focal sheen, for half the money. I have mixed on both a few times in a good room, and the results were equally superb. Even with the Twins, the music just literally fell into place and transferred perfectly onto everything else I tried it on. Not even using a sub (in this case) and the sub-bass STILL fell right into the pocket. Sounded huge, solid, deep, and without any mush or bleed over, on several sub-enhanced car audio systems and home theaters. It was so easy to grid the frequency spectrum of the mixed material. Focal are the monitors that have impressed me the most. The Sm9's are amazing for sure....but the difference compared to the Twins, for the money, as a tool in the real world, is getting into the smallest of critical areas. I *perhaps* even felt that the SM9's didn't transfer as well to the outside world, perhaps because they are too "perfect". Sometimes, in my experience, the most expensive is not always the "best". IMHO of course.Sina172 wrote:
Not the Twins if you want the Ultimate.
SM9's are THE pair of monitors to get! I just placed my order for 8 Pairs of SM9's to put in the Studio after I heard them today.....
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD! WHAT A SPEAKER!
Sina