
i had funn whit my stuff, BUT after some series mistakes from ROLAND i went to KORG more,
VST,s is the future all say, NO not for me, In studio YES, In live i wanna play Real things
Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever
Just looking at the OP there's positive NET assets - which is total assets less debt. So there's no balance to pay - parent company would have been covering its losses on an ongoing basis.Sharp wrote:Sadly, a sign of the times.Hugo wrote:What will this mean in practice?
I'm not sure how the law works on an international level though, but I would imagine shutting down their EU division and liquidating assets is only helpful if the assets are greater than the debts.
Normally this is never the case, so.... who pays the balance.
On paper yes and living in the EU it certainly feels like it at times when I do dollar conversions for my products.John Hendry wrote: And in Europe everyone gets robbed twice as much as people in the US.
Yes its great we get that cover, but nothing is for free.You are responsible for the goods you sell and if a customer
returns an item they purchased from you that is faulty (it does
not conform to contract) because it
• does not match the description
• is not of satisfactory quality
• is not fit for purpose,
you (not the manufacturer or supplier) are legally obliged
to resolve the matter with the customer at any time for up to
six years from the date of purchase, or in Scotland for up to
five years from the discovery of the problem.
Any refund, repair or replacement you arrange with your
customer relating to faulty goods must not cause them too
much inconvenience and you will have to pay for other costs,
for example, collection or delivery.
If you disagree with a customer’s claim, you can ask if they
are willing for you to send the item to a third party or the
manufacturer for inspection. If the customer agrees you can
do this, it is important to remember that the goods must not
be damaged during this process.
Or maybe they make up in Europe for all those nice low RRPs and discounts they're giving in the US?Ojustaboo wrote: Maybe there's a much higher RRP in the EU to take all this into account?
I'm not sure what kind of volume your stores are moving but I know here in the U.S.....If I'm buying a high dollar item, I always go to a major city retailer versus a small local store....The small local store will tell you straight out they can't match the low prices of the big outlets because they by small quantities and don't get the discounts the big outlets get by buying large volumes.....Like the Kronos, if a local store stocks 2 or 3 max versus a major retailer that stocks 50.......moonbrambos wrote:Or maybe they make up in Europe for all those nice low RRPs and discounts they're giving in the US?Ojustaboo wrote: Maybe there's a much higher RRP in the EU to take all this into account?
I agree in principle, but the 303 specifically would be useless, as there are not only many very good clones on the market but also many great DIY versions (based originally on Adafruit's work). I just finished building one, it even uses original Roland old stock transistors and ICs to make it sound identical, and it has updates features like midi and USB. Cost me about 300 bucks.Timo wrote:The likes of Korg, Dave Smith, Waldorf etc. have gone back to analog and have re-issued some of their vintage synths.
The company with the greatest ability to add to this, perhaps more than many other, is Roland. They have an enormous back-catalogue of analogue, and the pedigree to go with them.
Imagine if they updated and re-issued even just the 303.
I feel Roland fail to keep up with fashion and demand sometimes. They make innovative products, and then they try and decide how to sell them, like they don't know what to do with them, or how to evolve them further, and then they drop them. Instead they should start with the customer and then work backwards to the product(s).
I wouldn't mind a big, kick-arse set of V-Drums though.
BIG +1. I haven't paid much Attention to Roland since the mid 90s. They've had a couple gems (V-Synth, JP-8080) here and there, but generally ever since they've just fell flat. They over dilute their product line with the same crap and HORDE the cool stuff into "Niche" products.Grey wrote:It is clearly evident that the main reason for Roland's situation at this time is a very tall pile of rigidity and stubbornness of it's people on top, amassed over a very long period of time. It's about their resistance to being flexible with giving their loyal customers what they truly want and only having it their (old and outlived) way.
It includes them being clearly stingy on features and functionality of their main products, definitely underpowering them by 2013 standards all as clear evidence of scarcity "business doing bad" kind of a state of affairs, which could only lead to more of the same, which it did.
The good news is that it's not the main Japan office that is being closed and I have no doubts that everything that's going on with them right now is a sign of a major restructuring, which will only bring more innovations and the kind of products we all expect, love and have been waiting for from Roland. And pretty soon! (They better!)
I often find myself using the phrase: "They don't make them as they used to" when it comes to Roland products. This would have to change if they want to once again become one of the leaders on the scene and reclaim their name.
Roland has all the technology they need to do just that.
Only willingness is required!.. And giving up the old ways!
So there's much to look forward to.. for their own sake!