"Vintage" synth project: Kurzweil 2600

Discussion relating to the Korg Kronos Workstation.

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever

enigmahack
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant
Posts: 727
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:39 pm
Location: Moncton, NB, CANADA (Eh?)
Contact:

Post by enigmahack »

JohnDonovan wrote: Well you're fine making your own music, but it's when you start redistributing Kurzweils samples (for free or otherwise) to other people who haven't purchased the Kurzweil synth & the sounds contained within it.

The same thing you're describing happens beyond just synth sounds too of course. Think of any number of records: e.g. Queens bassline from Under Pressure has been sampled and used many times, but just because someone's added other stuff to it and made their own record doesn't mean they don't have to pay Queen for using the original sample
Okay, I think I get where you're going with it.

It's similar to me making a backup of a CD. I can back up my own CD's for personal use, but I can't distribute them because whoever else could get a hold of them would be able to get the benefit of using them without having paid the source for their work.

That makes sense. So if I were to re-create Kurzweil stuff, I would need to do so using entirely stock Kronos parts, otherwise I'm free to do with the Kurzweil what I wish provided it stays within my private inventory.

Thanks for the clarification, that makes more sense to me.
Korg Kronos 88 2, Korg Kronos 73, Kurzweil K2600S
Sound developer, custom sound designer and trainer/Kronos support - www.audora.ca for details!
SanderXpander
Platinum Member
Posts: 7860
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:23 am

Post by SanderXpander »

I think it's a pretty grey area honestly, legally speaking. Sharp has some experience with it too.

You can however clearly understand the intent of the law in this case and since you like the Kurzweil and presumably by extension its creators, it wouldn't be very chique to "steal" from them even if they couldn't legally make it stick.
User avatar
QuiRobinez
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:08 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by QuiRobinez »

enigmahack wrote:So where is the line drawn then?

If I sample a sound used in the Kurzweil and integrate that sample into a sound I've created, is that unlawful? I'm injecting my own IP but by using something provided by Kurzweil. I'm allowed to use the 2600 in my recordings and make money from that.

What about if I recreated the sounds of the Kurzweil, but using no samples whatsoever. I'm recreating the sounds very similarly using the ideas and IP from Kurzweil however using no actual materials made by them?

What about a combination of both?
I've also looked into this area, i use this definition, if the source was created by another developer / company then sampling is a no go area for me. In case of sampling (which is a form of copying the original source) kurzweil has invested money to create the rom samples, so sampling (copying) those samples to use them for my own commercial sound set would be something i would never do. (although i don't own a kurzweil, but i had the same discussions about sounds from the Yamaha Motif).

The same applies by sampling the complete presets of synths, it's extremely easy nowadays to clone other synth presets by sampling them with an automated process and a couple of hours extra work for some of the filter and effect settings in the kronos. Since sampling presets is also copying someone else their work it's also an area that i would never do for a commercial sound set.

Of course i have sampled a couple of my other own synths for the kronos, if i need my favorite Virus TI presets, then i don't have to start my virus TI but just have to load that Sample library i created in the kronos, or the nord lead 4, jp8080, etc. and use those sounds directly in the kronos combis. But that's for my own use, which in my opinion is fine.

Also, when i created new sounds for the Motif XF based on their rom sounds i would never create a sampled commercial sound set of them because they were based on the Rom samples of the Motif XF which were created by Yamaha.

Now what can i do with other synths without these limits to create new sample sets for the kronos? If you have a Analog or VA synth and you create your own presets and sample those for your own sample library, then in my opinion this is perfectly fine. The sounds are generated by the synth and I am sampling my own work from other synths.

Also using engines of other synths with your own samples to create new fresh sounds is perfectly fine in my opinion. For instance, i have a lot of Virus TI sounds that i created for that synth. What i did was using those samples as the sample source in the Granulair engine of Omnisphere 2. The end result is simply stunning and the new samples libraries i am creating with that technique brings a completely new sound spectrum to the Kronos.

And this is were things get really interesting, sampling Rom sounds from others or exisiting presets is just a simple copying trick with some added techniques to make them work on the kronos. But when i'm thinking outside that box and creating new kind of samples with all kind of techniques then i am creating something really unique for the kronos without any problems with existing companies.

But this is just my own moral compass, it's a fact that there are other commercial suppliers that are sampling presets of other existing synths, so i guess it's a grey area or they just take the risk.
User avatar
ExcelMusicStudio
Junior Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:14 am
Location: Brisbane QLD Australia
Contact:

Post by ExcelMusicStudio »

I bought a PC3 88 ... & found the programming a totally alien protocol... I could not get my head around it... I bought it on the premise that I could port over old K2600 sounds.. I used "3rd world" from a K2600 years & along with a couple of others & wanted to revive the project..

they were not compatible ... so I bought a K2600 module & got the sound I wanted.. but the long winded timer wasting shamozzle I went through was just not worth it.. so I sold the PC3 .. with a sigh of relief...

the PC3 had the best Acoustic concert harp that I have heard.. thankfully I recorded it on a soundtrack project & so got some use out of it..
imagination has NO LIMITS - http://www.youtube.com/user/excelmusicstudio

Songwriter , Lyricist , Music Producer
Korg Kronos 73 , Korg Wavestation SR , Korg M1Rex , Korg A2 Effects , Alesis D4 , Alesis DM5 , Alesis DMpro , Alesis QS4r , Passac Sentient 6 , Roland GP16 , Kurzweil K2000r , Creamware Pulsar , 37 guitars & basses , whacky sense of humour , glass of orange juice.
User avatar
EXer
Platinum Member
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:35 pm
Location: France

Re: "Vintage" synth project: Kurzweil 2600

Post by EXer »

enigmahack wrote:My project is basically to 'import' the Kurzweil 2600 into the Kronos. I used to have an extensive sound library on my old Kurzweil but when I got my PC3K8, it turns out (much to my complete and utter horror since I sold my beloved, and fully loaded, K2500XS to get the PC3K8) that the sounds are not compatible. My samples will load but my complicated programming sounds don't come over, don't sound right, some key mappings are off, some samples simply don't exist, etc.
Have you analysed why K2600 patches don't sound like they should in the PC3K?

Afaik the main differences between those instruments are: 1. Triple Mode has been superseded by Dynamic VAST; 2. the effects structure is different from KDFX.

Triple Mode patches are not converted automatically when imported into the PC3K (which can give the infamous 'Object Not Found' msg), but you could try to recreate them with Dynamic VAST. Of course this requires a good knowledge of VAST programming, but it would certainly require less work and give better results than sampling the Kurz ROM and creating programs from those samples on another synth.

Just my 2 cents.
enigmahack
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant
Posts: 727
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:39 pm
Location: Moncton, NB, CANADA (Eh?)
Contact:

Re: "Vintage" synth project: Kurzweil 2600

Post by enigmahack »

EXer wrote:
enigmahack wrote:My project is basically to 'import' the Kurzweil 2600 into the Kronos. I used to have an extensive sound library on my old Kurzweil but when I got my PC3K8, it turns out (much to my complete and utter horror since I sold my beloved, and fully loaded, K2500XS to get the PC3K8) that the sounds are not compatible. My samples will load but my complicated programming sounds don't come over, don't sound right, some key mappings are off, some samples simply don't exist, etc.
Have you analysed why K2600 patches don't sound like they should in the PC3K?

Afaik the main differences between those instruments are: 1. Triple Mode has been superseded by Dynamic VAST; 2. the effects structure is different from KDFX.

Triple Mode patches are not converted automatically when imported into the PC3K (which can give the infamous 'Object Not Found' msg), but you could try to recreate them with Dynamic VAST. Of course this requires a good knowledge of VAST programming, but it would certainly require less work and give better results than sampling the Kurz ROM and creating programs from those samples on another synth.

Just my 2 cents.
Of course I've analyzed why - In some cases, it's because of ROM samples that don't exist. In some cases, it's TMP and KDFX is different as you mentioned. In other cases, it's keymapping issues that contain values that make sense in the 2600 but not in the PC3K.

It's annoying that I should have to go through all of this extra work when Kurzweil themselves released a 'compatibility' file that contains *some* of the missing ROMs, but when I loaded my sounds after installing the compatibility file, it actually broke my sounds worse.

Some sounds were plain wrong. Some were using custom keymaps that weren't supported by the PC3K, which means intonation on some sounds were off. Some were 1 semitone off exactly, but only on certain layers.

The diagnosing and editing of over 2000 sounds? No thanks. It's not a lack of VAST programming skill or ability; I've been programming Kurzweil's since 1999. It's purely because I don't want to have to.

Besides, some of these sounds are programmed with certain algorithms that either are different, sound different or don't exist in the PC3K... There's no way for me to know if the sound result is actually the same even after editing or not. At least the 2600 I know without a doubt that the programs and setups work properly and sound exactly the way they're supposed to. I don't want to spend hours guessing on the PC3K.

I'm in the process of moving those sounds over to the Kronos anyway, so I'd rather just get a 2600 where I know the sounds work perfectly and move the library over by building off of the 2600 engine instead of rebuilding them in the PC3K, not being 100% certain if the sound is actually back the way it's supposed to be or not because I don't have the original reference.
Korg Kronos 88 2, Korg Kronos 73, Kurzweil K2600S
Sound developer, custom sound designer and trainer/Kronos support - www.audora.ca for details!
jeremykeys
Platinum Member
Posts: 3093
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:06 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Post by jeremykeys »

I can't say I blame you. That sounds like it would be a crazy amount of work.
If music is the food of love, play on and play loud!
Gear: Kronos 73, Wavestation EX, Polysix, King Korg, Monotron and Monotron Duo, Minikorg, Moog Grandmother, my very old MiniKorg, 4 acoustic and 9 electric guitars, 1 Ibanez 5 string bass, a Steel guitar, a bunch of microphones, 2 pairs of studio monitors and other very cool toys, 1 wife and 4 cats and a lava lamp!
enigmahack
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant
Posts: 727
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:39 pm
Location: Moncton, NB, CANADA (Eh?)
Contact:

Post by enigmahack »

jeremykeys wrote:I can't say I blame you. That sounds like it would be a crazy amount of work.
It is man. It is.

I shouldn't have sold my K2500 back in the day, but I got rid of it to get the PC3K which I understood would support my sounds :-/

Oh well, I've still got my Kronos :)
Korg Kronos 88 2, Korg Kronos 73, Kurzweil K2600S
Sound developer, custom sound designer and trainer/Kronos support - www.audora.ca for details!
jeremykeys
Platinum Member
Posts: 3093
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:06 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Post by jeremykeys »

I know exactly how you feel brother! I truly can't think of any keyboard that I sold that I didn't regret losing later. I was very lucky when I managed to get my Minikorg back. Now I'll be hard pressed to sell anything unless it goes up in smoke!
If music is the food of love, play on and play loud!
Gear: Kronos 73, Wavestation EX, Polysix, King Korg, Monotron and Monotron Duo, Minikorg, Moog Grandmother, my very old MiniKorg, 4 acoustic and 9 electric guitars, 1 Ibanez 5 string bass, a Steel guitar, a bunch of microphones, 2 pairs of studio monitors and other very cool toys, 1 wife and 4 cats and a lava lamp!
eriknie
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:48 am

Post by eriknie »

I know what you talk about.
Recently swapped my Kurzweil pC3K6 for a Kronos 61.

In many areas the Kurzweil is more advanced, more flexible and I know the sounds. I have a big Kurzweil history starting with a K2000, K2600r, PC88, PC3, PC3K6.

The Kronos has a few benifits for me: nice option for backingtracks, Show chords in the setup mode.

I miss some sounds, but overal (especially in band context) I can get the job done. Some sounds have improved, some are a little bit less.
But after 3 weeks I can do thing that took me years to tweak on the Kurzweil.

The PC3 does sound better than the K2600. Something with better DA and output stage. More fatter, stable. You probably don't need all the 2000 sounds, so just try to import the most important once, and if they deviate a little bit, you can tweak them.
Post Reply

Return to “Korg Kronos”