Kronos- Sequencer

Discussion relating to the Korg Kronos Workstation.

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever

lcceo22
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 2:45 pm

Post by lcceo22 »

danmusician wrote:lcceo22, I'm not defensive about it. I just don't understand the incessant whining about the missing piano roll. It's not there, we know it's not there. Focus on what is, or buy a keyboard that has it.

So if Korg could put it, why do you suppose they haven't after five years of begging?
That's not how this works. I'll focus on what I want to focus on, not what *you* want me to focus on and buy whatever keyboard I want. That love it or leave it logic holds no truth at all. By that logic YOU should abandon anything that you aren't 100% pleased with. If there's a single thing you dislike about something, your rationale seems to be to jump ship.

Do you think the country you live in is flawless?
If not, why don't you leave?
How about your job? Relationships? TV shows? Do you cut bait on everything in your world that has some sort of flaw?

When you practice what you preach and live out that "love it or leave it" logic in every facet of your life, I'll consider following suit.


You’re absolutely defensive. “love it or leave it” is a defensive tact. You guys act like if someone is bringing up the piano roll that it somehow means they can’t/don’t appreciate the positives of the board. The two aren’t mutually exclusive, it’s as though complaining about the piano roll means people think the whole thing is a brick. You’re basically telling people to shut up about the negatives and only discuss the positives, which is absurd.
Lastly, as I said before, there’s no merit to this notion that “if they could, they would”. None whatsoever.

Hell the Maschine folks have spent years begging for audio tracks and real time time stretching, not to mention better communication with their user base…. On their own site no less.. and that has largely fallen on deaf ears.
Your line of thinking would say that it’s not there because it’s not possible because as you said, if they could do it they would have, but that’s not true. It IS possible and it is in fact finally in the works, but it wasn’t announced until Akai dropped a bomb on the entire niche with the new MPC’s and they needed to keep people from jumping ship.

So you asking “why do you suppose that is” and “don’t you think they would if they could?” doesn’t follow any logic or factual basis. It’s not there because it’s not there. If you don’t like people talking about the lack of a piano roll, follow your own advice and don’t read forums where people might dislike one aspect of a product you apparently think is flawless.
amit
Approved Merchant
Approved Merchant
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:41 am
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Re: With due respect

Post by amit »

lcceo22 wrote:
GregC wrote:
lcceo22 wrote:
I don't think your name calling ( corporate shill) is what this forum is about.

No one is forcing you to read a post, if you don't like it. Lots of folks are interested in the strengths over the past 5 years. No one is going to change your mind to buy a Kronos if it does not work for you.

We have tossed around the pros and cons thoroughly, as you would expect for a + 5 yr old workstation.
Name calling? You can't possibly be that sensitive.

"has the ring of corporate shill" doesn't really rise to the standard of "name calling". it addressed the fact that the response avoided discussing what the Kronos lacked and deflected toward things it doesn't, which is a very corporate way of handling complaints.

It was a perfectly reasonable and accurate description of your post. Note how you took issue with my terminology and, yet again, sidestepped the actual content of my critique. Again, a very corporate response to criticism.

As for "no one is forcing me to read the post", you could say the same for mine. It's an empty statement, same as the baseless assertion of me "name calling". It's rhetoric that doesn't actually mean something.

What's interesting about this is that I showed far more respect for you than you showed me.

While you read my post and responded with vague, broad dismissals that avoided both the content and context of my post, I took the time to articulate a perfectly civil and reasonable reply that dealt specifically with the logic, context, and subject of you post.

Yes, lots of folks are interested in it's strengths. Lots of folks are unhappy to some degree with it's flaws.

Is this a site solely for zealots? If I missed some rule where Kronos is above criticism and no discussion of any flaws it may have are allowed, I'll happily conform. Otherwise, you're free to employ your own logic: nobody is forcing you to read posts that don't blindly worship every aspect of the board without question.

Oh, and I own a Kronos. I have no idea what information you used to arrive at the conclusion that I don't.
danmusician wrote:It seems that for many users of the forum, the piano roll is more important than the many other features of the Kronos. If that's the case, you can save some money and buy a Krome.

The Kronos doesn't have that feature even though people have begged for it for 5 years. Don't you think that if Korg could implement it, they would have by now? One must assume that there is some reason that it's not there. Perhaps it puts a hit on processing power, who knows?

I sometimes wonder if some folks think Korg is keeping out the piano roll just to spite them.
-People don't want a Krome. They want a Kronos. They'd just like to see them add a piano roll. further, there's zero merit to the conclusion that "if they could have, they would have'.


-1000
amit wrote: Kronos has enough connectivity options to facilitate a daw or iPad integration to use best of the best piano rolls if one needs. I don't see much use of piano roll in live situations , and in studio environment, I don't see why one shouldnt make the best use of the options available.
Rarely there's one thing that does all , and be real good at it.
Why do you assume people don't make use of the options available? I use it perfectly fine in Cubase. What's wrong with wanting and wishing it had better sequencer functionality for me to use in box?

I don't understand why so many people here get so defensive at any criticism levied at the Kronos. God forbid one speak ill of the mighty Kronos. I own it, love it, use it just fine in Cubase, and, OMG, GASP..... still wish they'd add a piano roll.
I assume the same way you assume about the things you trying to address here.
It's not about being defensive here, it just that some people think, feel and speak in a different way than you.
Any and every realtime feature has a cost associated with it. In Performance machines like this these costs can be severe and counter-productive, thus even if possible, many times not feasible. I am not talking about monetary costs here but more of resources cost.
While for you, the polyphony or an extra effect might be of no consequence but for others like me and/or Korg that could have been the priority along with smooth audio at lowest latency possible.
There is a lot that goes behind the scenes, so while to some it may seem otherwise, Korg just might as well be ignoring all this knowing what it's worth.

So, though I too would not mind having a piano roll, I still stand by the decisions behind it's non-inculsion.
As far as workstations go, there could be another million things more,that one could want..
DX7-MOD-7 Patches | Korg Related Content
iPad Pro 12.9,MBP
Korg (Kronos 2, PA600,WavestateVolcaFM), Moog Subsequent 37, Waldorf Pulse 2, ,Novation (Peak, Circuit), Roland GR55, Roli Rise 49, Boog Model D Novation Sl 49, Launchpad Pro, Ableton Push 2 + Suite,Yamaha DTX Multi 12, Akai EWI USB, Nano key Studio, Arturia(BeatStep Pro,DrumBrute,Keystep),StryMon(Big Sky,Timeline), Mooer Ocean Machine, Zoom MS-70CDR,MXR Carbon Copy Deluxe, MicroKontrol,KLC, Korg DS-1H, Korg EXP-2,Roland DP-10, Nanopad 2, TEcontrol BBC2, Soundcraft Signatrure 22 MTK, Yamaha MG10XU,UltraG DI,Eris E5 .. List
User avatar
mikeyd
Senior Member
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:39 am
Location: California

Post by mikeyd »

Wow look who's getting defensive now. The people that have responded to your posts iceceo have hundreds if not thousands of posts contributing to these forums. You have 17. None of which really points to any significant contribution other than stating what's wrong with this keyboard. Your coming here pointing out the flaws of the KRONOS, correcting other users when they disagree with you with your huge responses, and calling members "corporate shills", is disrespectful and counterproductive.
As people have pointed out, your posts about the "flaws" in the KRONOS have been posted numerous times and the lack of a piano roll has been posted ad nauseam. There literally was a poll just a few weeks ago.

Nobody is getting paid to be here, and nobody is a KORG employee (except for Dan who pops in once in awhile). There have been improvements in KRONOS because of these forums.

You sound unhappy with your decision to own a KRONOS.
Well after being a longtime member of these forums most of us are not. I have learned a ton of things about this keyboard from the members of this forum and am greatful it exists.

Try sharing some of your knowledge about the KRONOS. I'm sure we would all benefit. The people here are talented and knowledgeable with good intentions. Hope you'll take advantage of that.
fcoulter
Senior Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:02 pm
Location: Central Florida

Post by fcoulter »

I don't want a piano roll editor for the sequencer. I want notation based editing. Real music notation. The stuff that's been developed over the last few centuries, not the last couple of decades.

And in order to view the notation, I'd like an HDMI monitor output, supporting 1920 x 1090. Not one that mirrors the touch screen but one that can actually be used for sequencing, editing voices, etc. The kind of stuff you don't do at gigs but do during prep and studio time. That way I can leave the monitor at home when I'm out playing.

But you know what? My desires would probably mean at least an additional thousand dollars in price, and a drop in sales.

(And I'm waiting for someone to want their Kronos to play videos on the external monitor so that they can create soundtracks without any external hardware. Let's add another grand to the mix.)
Fred

Korg: Kronos2 88
Other: Tyros 5 76, DGX-650, YPT-320, Fretted Clavichord, Upright Piano, DX-7, SY-99, eMu MPS (last three in attic)

RCM Certificates: Advanced Rudiments
danmusician
Platinum Member
Posts: 875
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:24 am
Location: Southern PA
Contact:

Post by danmusician »

fcoulter wrote:I don't want a piano roll editor for the sequencer. I want notation based editing. Real music notation. The stuff that's been developed over the last few centuries, not the last couple of decades.

And in order to view the notation, I'd like an HDMI monitor output, supporting 1920 x 1090. Not one that mirrors the touch screen but one that can actually be used for sequencing, editing voices, etc. The kind of stuff you don't do at gigs but do during prep and studio time. That way I can leave the monitor at home when I'm out playing.

But you know what? My desires would probably mean at least an additional thousand dollars in price, and a drop in sales.

(And I'm waiting for someone to want their Kronos to play videos on the external monitor so that they can create soundtracks without any external hardware. Let's add another grand to the mix.)
+1 Fred! Great post!
Kronos 2 88, Kronos Classic 73, PX-5S, Kronos 2 61, Roli Seaboard Rise 49
danmusician
Platinum Member
Posts: 875
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:24 am
Location: Southern PA
Contact:

Post by danmusician »

lcceo22, this is my last post to you on the subject.

I don't think the Kronos is perfect. I've posted my wishes and concerns since I bought my first Kronos in August, 2011. BTW, I own three and use one at work owned by my employer.

Among other things, I'd like the foot switch to be assignable in Set List slots. Sometimes, I'd like to use it for Karma Latch and other times for sequence start/stop. It's not there, no use continuing to whine about it.

The fact remains, either the Kronos does what you need or it doesn't. No instrument does everything. Find the one that most meets your needs and that you can live with its shortcomings.

For what it's worth, if the piano roll was there, I'd use it. I'd even like Korg to add it. They haven't. Life is short, move on.
Kronos 2 88, Kronos Classic 73, PX-5S, Kronos 2 61, Roli Seaboard Rise 49
lcceo22
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 2:45 pm

Post by lcceo22 »

amit wrote:
I assume the same way you assume about the things you trying to address here.

It's not about being defensive here, it just that some people think, feel and speak in a different way than you.

Any and every realtime feature has a cost associated with it. In Performance machines like this these costs can be severe and counter-productive, thus even if possible, many times not feasible. I am not talking about monetary costs here but more of resources cost.

While for you, the polyphony or an extra effect might be of no consequence but for others like me and/or Korg that could have been the priority along with smooth audio at lowest latency possible.

There is a lot that goes behind the scenes, so while to some it may seem otherwise, Korg just might as well be ignoring all this knowing what it's worth.

So, though I too would not mind having a piano roll, I still stand by the decisions behind it's non-inculsion.

As far as workstations go, there could be another million things more, that one could want..
Assume?

No. I addressed specific things that were said. The whole “other people speak different than you” thing is nonsense, as though simply being different is the issue.

The “million things more” that one could want bit, while true, is just a deflection. We’re talking about a modern feature Korg includes in other products that plenty of other people ask about.
mikeyd wrote:Wow look who's getting defensive now. The people that have responded to your posts iceceo have hundreds if not thousands of posts contributing to these forums. You have 17. None of which really points to any significant contribution other than stating what's wrong with this keyboard. Your coming here pointing out the flaws of the KRONOS, correcting other users when they disagree with you with your huge responses, and calling members "corporate shills", is disrespectful and counterproductive.
As people have pointed out, your posts about the "flaws" in the KRONOS have been posted numerous times and the lack of a piano roll has been posted ad nauseam. There literally was a poll just a few weeks ago.

Nobody is getting paid to be here, and nobody is a KORG employee (except for Dan who pops in once in awhile). There have been improvements in KRONOS because of these forums.

You sound unhappy with your decision to own a KRONOS.
Well after being a longtime member of these forums most of us are not. I have learned a ton of things about this keyboard from the members of this forum and am greatful it exists.

Try sharing some of your knowledge about the KRONOS. I'm sure we would all benefit. The people here are talented and knowledgeable with good intentions. Hope you'll take advantage of that.
What exactly do thousands of posts or seventeen posts have to do with the content of the discussion?

As far as “correcting members who disagree with me”, well yes, it’s entirely reasonable to correct inaccurate/incorrect/baseless assumptions and deflections. Note your issue is with me correcting those things and not the actual content of the correction. I’ve consistently discussed the content of what’s being said.

The corporate shill thing was a reference to sidestepping the flaw to redirect toward the strength as though that deals with the flaw. What does it matter if a post is about a flaw or a strength? Is this forum only for the undying worship of zealots, or are differing views actually allowed without a dogpile? If you have a problem with this being yet another piano roll post, take it up with the guy who made this post. I simply replied to the topic, I didn’t create it. If you have a problem with the poll, I certainly didn’t create it.

You cite the fact that there have been improvements made to Kronos because of the forums…. And yet seem bothered by vocal, passionate pleas for another improvement, one that actually won the aforementioned poll by a landslide? Talk about a contradiction.

And I’m far from unhappy with Kronos. In fact, my passionate selling of the strengths of the Kronos has resulted in a friend deciding to purchase one. It might upset you guys to know that I also made sure he understood that Kronos does have certain limitations with the sequencer and makes for a tedious drum sampler.

I did that while putting over the synth engines, quality and scope of preset sounds, which sounds absolutely blow away his Motif and VST’s as well as which sounds are absolutely awful on Kronos, the swift efficiency of the touch screen combined with the tactile hardware controls, the massive wide array of expansion options, the superior FX/mixer routing options, downplaying his fear of the steep learning curve, a simple way of working with Kronos in a DAW, on being able to essentially use the Kronos as an audio recorder and post production station and much more.

I talked him out of buying a Roland FA06- something I derided as a toy compared to the Kronos on this very forum, funny I don’t recall three dismissive responses to that one- and Montage, which I found to be a vastly inferior product soundwise, and getting a Kronos instead. I sold him on the Kronos being an embarrassment of riches.

This post in here about the piano roll was in response to the topic, not something I posted out of the blue.

I also posted about how I’d like to see Kronos develop into a platform, not because I’m dissatisfied with what I have, but because I see the potential to build further on the concept.
Post Reply

Return to “Korg Kronos”