karmathanever wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12JZKRO_FYA
Obviously he wants to promote the sales of the PA5x but you can clearly hear differences in this video.
Of course it is all very subjective and depends so much on EQ and FX. It's a bit like comparing 2 cheddar cheeses.
I'd like to know what the on-board EQ settings were in both keyboards.
I am assuming he was fair and played both through the same sound system and setup.
So many are complementing on the "improved" sounds but is it the samples or the improved FX or both?
Would be nice to see a similar styles comparison video - after all, it is an arranger keyboard....

Dear Pete, I fully agree.
I "heard" this video two 2 days ago very intensely and I have asked myself the same question. Of course the sound is on a very high level - I do not have any Kronos where I can compare with these high level sounds. But the first thing, that came into my mind: these new sounds have definitely more effects. There is more FX (EQ/Ambience/Reverb etc) used with a very long reverb flag. In a solo situation really nice but in a full arranged setup (drums, bass, pads etc) too much. This is my impression.
To get back to the original question, it is very hard nearly impossible to perceive and evaluate the real improvement.
One last comment from my side. I have the subjective impression, making my future Pa5x ready for live gigs (comming from the 4x) will take weeks and massive effort.
Regards from Cologne
Ralf
https://leschloma.de