apex wrote:? nice job editing the post too ozy...why would you do that?

I streamlined it and went to the essentials.
But if you find that the original version was less "Catch 22"-ish in its logics,
here we go:
apex wrote:I didn't say I believed it. The rep even said, that this kind of info has been wrong before....But he felt inclined enough to call and let me know the info, and I returned the favor to the community.
Thta's unedited, pure Director's cut.
May I translate it in plain English?
"Everybody knows it's probably bullshit, I don't believe it and the guy who generated the idea thought it probably is a mistake: but
let's spread it anyway, never mind what happens if somebody believes it. More information is always good, tright? Even if it's dubious"
I just noticed that this is how airplane disasters happen.
A says to B that C is probably happening, but the instruments are probably wrong. they agree that the instruments are wrong, and that the information should be discarde, so - being human and fallible - they go and tell D that C is happening. D believes it, American Airlines 228 lands into McDonald's kitchen sink 5 miles south of the Podunk airport
